Observational quantification of a total aerosol indirect effect in the Arctic

Tellus B ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 62 (3) ◽  
pp. 181-189 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dan Lubin ◽  
Andrew Vogelmann
2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yiquan Jiang ◽  
Zheng Lu ◽  
Xiaohong Liu ◽  
Yun Qian ◽  
Kai Zhang ◽  
...  

Abstract. Aerosols from wild-land fires could significantly perturb the global radiation balance and induce the climate change. In this study, the Community Atmospheric Model version 5 (CAM5) with prescribed daily fire aerosol emissions is used to investigate the spatial and seasonal characteristics of radiative effects (REs) of wildfire aerosols including black carbon (BC) and particulate organic matter (POM). The global annual mean direct radiative effect (DRE) of all fire aerosols is 0.155 ± 0.01 W m−2, mainly due to the absorption of fire BC (0.25 ± 0.01 W m−2), while fire POM induces a small overall effect (−0.05 to 0.04 ± 0.01 W m−2). Strong positive DRE is found in the Arctic and in the oceanic regions west of South Africa and South America as a result of amplified absorption of fire BC above low-level clouds, in general agreement with satellite observations. The global annual mean cloud radiative effects (CRE) due to all fire aerosols is −0.70 ± 0.05 W m−2, resulting mainly from the fire POM indirect effect (−0.59 ± 0.03 W m−2). The large cloud liquid water path over land areas of the Arctic favors the strong fire aerosol indirect effect (up to −15 W m−2) during the Arctic summer. Significant surface cooling, precipitation reduction and low-level cloud amount increase are also found in the Arctic summer as a result of the fire aerosol indirect effect. The global annual mean surface albedo effect (SAE) over land areas (0.03 ± 0.10 W m−2) is mainly due to the fire BC-in-snow effect (0.02 W m−2) with the maximum albedo effect occurring in spring (0.12 W m−2) when snow starts to melt.


Author(s):  
Graham Feingold ◽  
Reinhard Furrer ◽  
Peter Pilewskie ◽  
Lorraine A. Remer ◽  
Qilong Min ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 60 ◽  
pp. 153-163 ◽  
Author(s):  
M.G. Manoj ◽  
P.C.S. Devara ◽  
Susmitha Joseph ◽  
A.K. Sahai

2017 ◽  
Vol 30 (17) ◽  
pp. 6959-6976 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yolanda L. Shea ◽  
Bruce A. Wielicki ◽  
Sunny Sun-Mack ◽  
Patrick Minnis

Cloud response to Earth’s changing climate is one of the largest sources of uncertainty among global climate model (GCM) projections. Two of the largest sources of uncertainty are the spread in equilibrium climate sensitivity (ECS) and uncertainty in radiative forcing due to uncertainty in the aerosol indirect effect. Satellite instruments with sufficient accuracy and on-orbit stability to detect climate change–scale trends in cloud properties will improve confidence in the understanding of the relationship between observed climate change and cloud property trends, thus providing information to better constrain ECS and radiative forcing. This study applies a climate change uncertainty framework to quantify the impact of measurement uncertainty on trend detection times for cloud fraction, effective temperature, optical thickness, and water cloud effective radius. Although GCMs generally agree that the total cloud feedback is positive, disagreement remains on its magnitude. With the climate uncertainty framework, it is demonstrated how stringent measurement uncertainty requirements for reflected solar and infrared satellite measurements enable improved constraint of SW and LW cloud feedbacks and the ECS by significantly reducing trend uncertainties for cloud fraction, optical thickness, and effective temperature. The authors also demonstrate improved constraint on uncertainty in the aerosol indirect effect by reducing water cloud effective radius trend uncertainty.


2013 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kai Zhang ◽  
Xiaohong Liu ◽  
Jin-Ho Yoon ◽  
Minghuai Wang ◽  
Jennifer M. Comstock ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document