Cereals, cereals-based products and animal feeding stuffs - determination of crude fat and total fat content by the Randall extraction method: a collaborative study

2010 ◽  
Vol 2 (4) ◽  
pp. 197-202 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jürgen Möller
1996 ◽  
Vol 79 (4) ◽  
pp. 907-916 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joanna M Lynch ◽  
David M Barbano ◽  
J Richard Fleming

Abstract A modified Mojonnier ether extraction method for determination of the fat content of cream was developed based on the method for milk (AOAC Official Method 989.05). The cream Babcock method (AOAC Official Method 920.111 B-C) was modified to harmonize with the milk Babcock method (AOAC Official Method 989.04) and to clarify procedural details. Using the AOAC collaborative study format, 10 laboratories tested 9 pairs of blind duplicate heat-treated cream samples with a fat range of 30-45% using both methods. The statistical performance (invalid and outlier data removed) was as follows: mean % fat = 37.932, sr = 0.125, sR = 0.151, RSDr = 0.330, RSDR = 0.398, r = 0.354, and R = 0.427 for the ether extraction method. For the Babcock method, mean % fat = 38.209, sr = 0.209, SR = 0.272, RSDr = 0.548, RSDR = 0.712, r = 0.592, and R = 0.769. Average test results for fat from the Babcock method were 0.277% (absolute fat) greater than for the Mojonnier ether extraction method. The difference between methods, as a percentage of the average fat content of the samples, was 0.73%. This agrees with differences observed between the 2 methods for milk when 10 to 17 laboratories tested 7 milk samples in blind duplicate at bimonthly intervals over a 4-year period (average difference 0.029% fat, 0.78% as a percentage of average fat content). The Mojonnier ether extraction and Babcock methods for fat in cream have been adopted by AOAC INTERNATIONAL. The new Babcock method replaced the AOAC Official Method 920.111 B-C.


1983 ◽  
Vol 66 (4) ◽  
pp. 927-932 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chester E Daugherty ◽  
Harry G Lento ◽  
◽  
M L Adams ◽  
E W Beckert ◽  
...  

Abstract Achloroform-methanol extraction method (complete extraction of fat in 3 min) for determining fat in processed and prepared foods has been studied collaboratively. Fourteen collaborators reported single replicate fat results on 7 samples representative of various food types and 2 spiked samples by the proposed method. Each sample was accompanied by a blind duplicate. For statistical purposes, the blind duplicates were treated as paired observations, and there were 2 laboratory outliers. There was a 97.9% agreement among the results from the remaining 12 collaborators and the Associate Referee for the unfortified samples. Recoveries of 93.8 and 98.3% were obtained on fortified samples, based on results obtained from 11 collaborators. The statistical analysis of the results indicate (ranges for standard deviations were Sr = 0.083-0.528, Sb = 0.101-0.379, Sd = 8.130-0.631, for fat values ranging from 1.58 to 26.91%) that this method is adequate for quantitating the fat content in a wide variety of processed foods for nutritional labeling. The method has been adopted official first action.


1993 ◽  
Vol 35 (9-12) ◽  
pp. 509-516 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. Lembke ◽  
H. Engelhardt

1990 ◽  
Vol 73 (6) ◽  
pp. 947-952
Author(s):  
John W Pensabene ◽  
Walter Fiddler ◽  
John G Phillips

Abstract A collaborative study was carried out on a solid-phase extraction method for separating volatile N-nltrosamlnes, particularly N-nltrosodlmethylamlne (NDMA), from combination minced fish or surlml-meat frankfurters with detection by gas chromatography-chemllumlnescence (thermal energy analyzer). The results from the 10 collaborators were evaluated using the most recent AOAC guidelines for determining outliers and for the analysis of variance. For NDMA, repeatability standard deviations, sr, ranged from 0.56 to 2.25; repeatability relative standard deviations, RSDr, ranged from 8.9 to 11.5%. Reproducibility standard deviations, sR, for NDMA ranged from 1.40 to 6.49, and reproducibility relative standard deviations, RSDR, ranged from 24.2 to 28.9%. Our data compared favorably to the reproducibility (RSDR) curve of Horwltz. The method has been adopted official first action by AOAC.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document