Interatrial Conduction Time Can Predict New-Onset Atrial Fibrillation After Radiofrequency Ablation of Isolated, Typical Atrial Flutter

2016 ◽  
Vol 27 (11) ◽  
pp. 1293-1297 ◽  
Author(s):  
RYUTA HENMI ◽  
KOICHIRO EJIMA ◽  
MORIO SHODA ◽  
DAIGO YAGISHITA ◽  
NOBUHISA HAGIWARA
Heart Rhythm ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 11 (11) ◽  
pp. 1884-1889 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jessica Voight ◽  
Mehmet Akkaya ◽  
Porur Somasundaram ◽  
Rehan Karim ◽  
Salimah Valliani ◽  
...  

EP Europace ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 20 (suppl_1) ◽  
pp. i170-i170
Author(s):  
M Marinkovic ◽  
N Markovic ◽  
T Potpara ◽  
N Mujovic

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hailei Liu ◽  
Zhoushan Gu ◽  
Chao Zhu ◽  
Mingfang Li ◽  
Jincheng Jiao ◽  
...  

Background: New-onset atrial fibrillation (AF) after ablation of typical atrial flutter (AFL) is not rare. This study aimed to investigate the predictive value of electrocardiographic parameters on new-onset AF post-typical AFL ablation.Methods: A total of 158 consecutive patients (79.1% males, mean age 57.8 ± 14.3 years) with typical AFL were enrolled between January 2012 and August 2017 in this single-center study. Patients with a history of AF before ablation were excluded. ECGs during sinus rhythm (SR) and AFL were collected. The duration of the negative component of flutter wave in lead II (DFNII), proportion of the DFNII of the total circle length of AFL (DFNII%), amplitude of the negative component of flutter wave in lead II (AFNII), duration (DPNV1), and amplitude (APNV1) of negative component of the P wave in lead V1, and P wave duration in lead II (DPII) during sinus rhythm were measured.Results: During a median follow-up of 26.9 ± 11.8 months, 22 cases (13.9%) developed new-onset AF. DFNII was significantly longer in patients with new-onset AF compared to patients without AF (114.7 ± 29.6 ms vs. 82.7 ± 12.8 ms, p < 0.0001). AFNII was significantly lower (0.118 ± 0.034 mV vs. 0.168 ± 0.051 mV, p < 0.0001), DPII (144.21 ± 23.77 ms vs. 111.46 ± 14.19 ms, p < 0.0001), and DPNV1 was significantly longer (81.07 ± 16.87 ms vs. 59.86 ± 14.42 ms, p < 0.0001) in patients with new-onset AF. In the multivariate analysis, DFNII [odds ratio (OR), 1.428; 95% CI, 1.039–1.962; p = 0.028] and DPII (OR, 1.429; 95% CI, 1.046–1.953; p = 0.025) were found to be independently associated with new-onset AF after typical AFL ablation.Conclusion: Parameters representing left atrial activation time under both the SR and AFL were independently associated with new-onset AF post-typical AFL ablation and may be useful in risk prediction, which needs to be confirmed by further prospective studies.


Circulation ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 132 (suppl_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ryuta Henmi ◽  
Koichiro Ejima ◽  
Daigo Yagishita ◽  
Yuji Iwanami ◽  
Moria Shoda ◽  
...  

Introduction: Previous studies showed inter-atrial conduction delay (IACT) is an important electrophysiological factor predicting atrial fibrillation (AF) after successful atrial flutter (AFL) ablation. To the best of our knowledge, there has no previous study regarding the prognostic value of IACT as a predictor of new-onset AF after AFL ablation without AF history. Hypothesis: The purpose of this study was to determine the incidence and predictors of new-onset AF after Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of isolated AFL in a retrospective cohort study. Methods: This study included consecutive patients who underwent successful RFA of isolated, typical AFL from 2004 to 2012. Patients with any history of AF prior to AFL ablation were excluded. IACT was defined as the interval from the onset of P-wave in 12-lead electrocardiogram to atrial intracardiac electrogram at the distal coronary sinus catheter. Results: Eighty patients were included in this study. During a mean follow-up 3.4±2.6 years after successful AFL ablation, 22 patients (27.5%) developed new-onset AF. A Cox regression multivariate analysis demonstrated that IACT was the independent predictor of new-onset AF after AFL ablation (odds ratio: 13.3; 95% confidence interval: 1.36-152.5; p=0.0255). IACT was accurate in predicting new-onset AF (AUC=0.70). The optimal cut-off point of IACT for predicting new-onset AF was ≧120ms, with a sensitivity of 0.476 and a specificity of 0.898. Kaplan-Meier curves showed that new-onset AF after AFL ablation was significantly higher in the patients with IACT ≧120ms compared to the patients with IACT< 120ms (p=0.0016). Conclusions: IACT is an independent risk factor for new-onset AF after AFL ablation without a history of AF.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document