Extended pre‐release holding with raspberry ketone and methoprene as supplements: Field performance of Bactrocera tryoni males

Author(s):  
Md Jamil Hossain Biswas ◽  
Polychronis Rempoulakis ◽  
Maurizio Benelli ◽  
Saleh Mohammad Adnan ◽  
Andrew P. Allen ◽  
...  
2016 ◽  
Vol 42 (2) ◽  
pp. 156-162 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew S. Siderhurst ◽  
Soo J. Park ◽  
Caitlyn N. Buller ◽  
Ian M. Jamie ◽  
Nicholas C. Manoukis ◽  
...  

PLoS ONE ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 11 (5) ◽  
pp. e0155827 ◽  
Author(s):  
Soo J. Park ◽  
Renata Morelli ◽  
Benjamin L. Hanssen ◽  
Joanne F. Jamie ◽  
Ian M. Jamie ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 75 (7) ◽  
pp. 1942-1950 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohammed Abul Monjur Khan ◽  
Lucas A Shuttleworth ◽  
Terry Osborne ◽  
Damian Collins ◽  
Geoff M Gurr ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 73 (8) ◽  
pp. 1764-1770 ◽  
Author(s):  
Humayra Akter ◽  
Vivian Mendez ◽  
Renata Morelli ◽  
Jeanneth Pérez ◽  
Phillip W Taylor

2020 ◽  
Vol 49 (4) ◽  
pp. 815-822 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jane E Royer ◽  
Keng Hong Tan ◽  
David G Mayer

Abstract The male fruit fly attractants, cue-lure (CL) and raspberry ketone (RK), are important in pest management. These volatile phenylbutanoids occur in daciniphilous Bulbophyllum Thouar (Orchidaceae: Asparagales) orchids, along with zingerone (ZN) and anisyl acetone (AA). While these four compounds attract a similar range of species, their relative attractiveness to multiple species is unknown. We field tested these compounds in two fruit fly speciose locations in north Queensland, Australia (Lockhart and Cairns) for 8 wk. Of 16 species trapped in significant numbers, 14 were trapped with CL and RK, all in significantly greater numbers with CL traps than RK traps (at least in higher population locations). This included the pest species Bactrocera tryoni (Froggatt) (Diptera: Tephritidae) (CL catches ca. 5× > RK), Bactrocera neohumeralis (Hardy) (Diptera: Tephritidae) and Bactrocera bryoniae (Tryon) (Diptera: Tephritidae) (CL catches ca. 3× > RK), and Bactrocera frauenfeldi (Schiner) (Diptera: Tephritidae) (in Cairns—CL catches ca. 1.6× > RK). Seven species were trapped with AA, and all were also caught in CL and RK traps in significantly greater numbers, with the exception of B. frauenfeldi. For this species, catches were not statistically different with CL, RK, and AA in Lockhart, and RK and AA in Cairns. Seven species were trapped with ZN, two at this lure only, and the remainder also with CL or RK but in significantly greater numbers. This is the first quantitative comparison of the relative attractiveness of CL, RK, AA, and ZN against multiple species, and supports the long-held but untested assumption that CL is broadly more attractive lure than RK.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document