scholarly journals Neural network fast‐classifies biological images through features selecting to power automated microscopy

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maël Balluet ◽  
Florian Sizaire ◽  
Youssef El Habouz ◽  
Thomas Walter ◽  
Jérémy Pont ◽  
...  
2019 ◽  
Vol 14 (7) ◽  
pp. 628-639 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bizhi Wu ◽  
Hangxiao Zhang ◽  
Limei Lin ◽  
Huiyuan Wang ◽  
Yubang Gao ◽  
...  

Background: The BLAST (Basic Local Alignment Search Tool) algorithm has been widely used for sequence similarity searching. Analogously, the public phenotype images must be efficiently retrieved using biological images as queries and identify the phenotype with high similarity. Due to the accumulation of genotype-phenotype-mapping data, a system of searching for similar phenotypes is not available due to the bottleneck of image processing. Objective: In this study, we focus on the identification of similar query phenotypic images by searching the biological phenotype database, including information about loss-of-function and gain-of-function. Methods: We propose a deep convolutional autoencoder architecture to segment the biological phenotypic images and develop a phenotype retrieval system to enable a better understanding of genotype–phenotype correlation. Results: This study shows how deep convolutional autoencoder architecture can be trained on images from biological phenotypes to achieve state-of-the-art performance in a phenotypic images retrieval system. Conclusion: Taken together, the phenotype analysis system can provide further information on the correlation between genotype and phenotype. Additionally, it is obvious that the neural network model of image segmentation and the phenotype retrieval system is equally suitable for any species, which has enough phenotype images to train the neural network.


2016 ◽  
Vol 216 (1) ◽  
pp. 65-71 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ben T. Grys ◽  
Dara S. Lo ◽  
Nil Sahin ◽  
Oren Z. Kraus ◽  
Quaid Morris ◽  
...  

With recent advances in high-throughput, automated microscopy, there has been an increased demand for effective computational strategies to analyze large-scale, image-based data. To this end, computer vision approaches have been applied to cell segmentation and feature extraction, whereas machine-learning approaches have been developed to aid in phenotypic classification and clustering of data acquired from biological images. Here, we provide an overview of the commonly used computer vision and machine-learning methods for generating and categorizing phenotypic profiles, highlighting the general biological utility of each approach.


2000 ◽  
Vol 25 (4) ◽  
pp. 325-325
Author(s):  
J.L.N. Roodenburg ◽  
H.J. Van Staveren ◽  
N.L.P. Van Veen ◽  
O.C. Speelman ◽  
J.M. Nauta ◽  
...  

2004 ◽  
Vol 171 (4S) ◽  
pp. 502-503
Author(s):  
Mohamed A. Gomha ◽  
Khaled Z. Sheir ◽  
Saeed Showky ◽  
Khaled Madbouly ◽  
Emad Elsobky ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document