Valve‐in‐valve transcatheter aortic valve replacement in the context of infective endocarditis: A word of caution

2020 ◽  
Vol 35 (5) ◽  
pp. 1162-1162
Author(s):  
Sam Mann ◽  
Amir S. Fathi ◽  
Jason M. Ali
2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (10) ◽  
pp. 790-801 ◽  
Author(s):  
Narut Prasitlumkum ◽  
Wasawat Vutthikraivit ◽  
Sittinun Thangjui ◽  
Thiratest Leesutipornchai ◽  
Jakrin Kewcharoen ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 211-220 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michel Pompeu B.O. Sá ◽  
Jef Van den Eynde ◽  
Matheus Simonato ◽  
Luiz Rafael P. Cavalcanti ◽  
Ilias P. Doulamis ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (5) ◽  
Author(s):  
Klaus-Dieter Hönemann ◽  
Steffen Hofmann ◽  
Frank Ritter ◽  
Gerold Mönnig

Abstract Background A rare, but serious, complication following transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is the occurrence of an iatrogenic ventricular septal defect (VSD). Case summary We describe a case of an 80-year-old female who was referred with severe aortic stenosis for TAVR. Following thorough evaluation, the heart team consensus was to proceed with implantation via a transapical approach of an ACURATE neo M 25 mm valve (Boston Scientific, Natick, MA, USA). The valve was deployed harnessing transoesophageal echocardiographic (TOE) guidance under rapid pacing with post-dilation. Directly afterwards a very high VSD close to the aortic annulus was detected. As the patient was haemodynamically stable, the procedure was ended. The next day another TOE revealed a shunt volume (left-to-right ventricle) between 50% and 60%. Because the defect was partly located between the stent struts of the ACURATE valve decision was made to fix this leakage with implantation of a further valve and we chose an EVOLUT Pro 29 mm (Medtronic Inc., Minneapolis, MN, USA). The valve-in-valve was implanted 2–3 mm below the lower edge of the first valve, more towards the left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) with excellent result: VSD was reduced to a very small residual shunt without any hemodynamic relevance. Discussion We suggest that an iatrogenic VSD located near the annulus may be treated percutaneously in a bail-out situation with implantation of a second valve that should be implanted slightly more into the LVOT to cover the VSD.


Circulation ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 142 (Suppl_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Manpreet Kaur ◽  
Anas M Saad ◽  
Keerat Ahuja ◽  
Simrat Kaur ◽  
Toshiaki Isogai ◽  
...  

Background: Infective endocarditis (IE) after Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) and Mitra Clip (MC) occurs less commonly but is associated with grave complications. We aim to report the incidence and outcomes of IE within 180 days of TAVR and MC. Methods: We used the Nationwide Readmissions Database (NRD) between 2014 and 2017 to select patients who underwent either TAVR or MC between January and June every year (to allow for at least 180 days of follow up in the NRD) using the appropriate International Classification of Diseases-9 th and 10 th revision (ICD) codes. We performed a chi-square test to compare baseline characteristics and rates of IE after TAVR and MC procedures. All statistical analyses were performed the using SPSS version 26. Results: We included 68,270 and 7,080 patients who underwent TAVR and MC respectively, of which 0.68% vs. 0.94% (P=.012), developed IE respectively within 180 days of procedure. During that index hospitalization, in-hospital mortality rates did not differ between the two groups (15.08% in TAVR vs. 17.91%, in MC P=.587). Other outcomes are presented in table 1. Conclusion: Our study suggests that the overall incidence of IE following TAVR and MC is relatively low but appropriate preventive measures should be taken after the procedures to reduce the morbidity and mortality. Further studies and analysis are required in modern MC and TAVR techniques to circumvent this critical complication.


Author(s):  
Tom C. Nguyen ◽  
Alexander P. Nissen ◽  
Pranav Loyalka ◽  
Eyal E. Porat

Reoperative aortic valve replacement is associated with increased morbidity. Valve-in-valve transcatheter aortic valve replacement offers a less invasive alternative to traditional reoperation. However, cases of valve failure after valve-in-valve transcatheter aortic valve replacement represent a complex surgical challenge. We present a case requiring a complex reoperative aortic valve replacement due to structural valve deterioration after multiple previous valve-in-valve transcatheter aortic valve replacements. We performed removal of 3 previous valve-in-valve transcatheter aortic valves, bioprosthetic leaflet excision, and intentional bioprosthetic fracture under direct vision for annular enlargement. This facilitated direct insertion of a new transcatheter aortic valve for expedient and successful management of recurrent aortic stenosis in a very high-risk patient. Creative use of leaflet excision, intentional bioprosthetic fracture, and insertion of a new transcatheter aortic valve under direct vision, proved efficient and successful in a high-risk patient with few surgical options.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document