Women judges or feminist judges?: Gender representation and feminist values in International Courts

Author(s):  
Kristen Hessler
Author(s):  
J Jarpa Dawuni

This chapter analyses the descriptive, symbolic, and substantive representation of women judges in international courts and tribunals. The last couple of years have witnessed slow progress in the quest to achieve sex balanced or gender parity benchmarks on the benches of international courts. While some courts have made incremental progress, others are still lagging. Using the African Court on Human and Peoples’ Rights (ACtHPR) as a case study, this chapter explores the factors that have contributed to the court’s gender parity outcomes in recent years. Moving beyond discussions of why women should be appointed, the chapter advances an argument on how to achieve gender parity through the creative interplay of three factors—legal instruments, specific strategies, and vested actors. The chapter makes a contribution to the literature on gender and diversity in international courts by highlighting some best practices for achieving and sustaining gender parity on the benches of international courts.


Author(s):  
Helen Keller ◽  
Corina Heri ◽  
Myriam Christ

The European Court of Human Rights is unique among regional and international courts in that, since 2004, States have been required to include both male and female nominees in their lists of three candidates for judicial office at the Court. Upon the introduction of this rule, the number of female judges at the Court rapidly rose. Despite this, today, there are still fewer women on the Strasbourg bench than men, and the number of female judges is now declining. This chapter explores some of the traits of successful female candidates for judicial office at the Court, namely their regional origin, age, professional background, and feminist engagement, as well as whether they were mothers of young children at the time of their election. It also examines the growing gender gap at the Court, addresses the importance of adequate gender representation on the Strasbourg bench, and formulates recommendations for continuing to ensure that women are appropriately represented among the Court’s judges.


2011 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 401-408 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patricia Wald

AbstractWomen have achieved much since the revival of international criminal justice. But much remains to be achieved, both in the number and quality of women judges and in the way that women's concerns are addressed, as the implementation of complementarity shifts humanitarian law from international to national judicial arenas.


Author(s):  
Teresa Doherty

Few female judges were appointed to the benches of the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia (ICTY), the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR), and Special Court for Sierra Leone. Nevertheless, those appointments resulted in an active contribution of these women judges to the development of international criminal law, as is shown in the jurisprudence. Judges give judgement on the evidence, facts, and law before them, but women judges have been noted for advancing the existing law through broad interpretation. With the appointment of women investigators and prosecutors, more prosecutions for crimes of sexual violence followed. This is important as it progressively developed a field of law that had until then not, or only in a more limited manner, been adjudicated upon before international courts.


AJIL Unbound ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 110 ◽  
pp. 92-97 ◽  
Author(s):  
Neus Torbisco-Casals

People ask me sometimes, when—when do you think it will be enough? When will there be enough women on the court? And my answer is when there are nine.Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, U.S. Supreme CourtNienke Grossman offers a much needed overview of the statistical patterns behind the substantial underrepresentation of women in international courts benches. As her inquiry reveals, despite the growing proportion of female qualified lawyers, sex representativeness has hardly improved in recent years. On the contrary, in the absence of special requirements in courts’ statutes or judicial selection procedures, the percentage of women judges has actually stagnated or even declined in some cases. Such acute sex imbalance cannot be attributed to the (contingent) fact that not enough qualified women are available for such highly prestigious positions. Grossman persuasively contests the plausibility of this widespread assumption. Not only is the limited-pool argument fallacious, but, as her analysis suggests, part of the problem might actually be that judicial selection procedures lack transparency and arenotdriven by merit. Instead, nominations of international judges are often used “to reward political loyalty or to advance political agendas”; this practice seriously impinges on the chances of women to be appointed as international judges, as politics (both domestic and international) remains very much a male-dominated sphere.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document