scholarly journals The nurse consultant in mental health services: A national, mixed methods study of an advanced practice role

2019 ◽  
Vol 26 (5-6) ◽  
pp. 117-130
Author(s):  
Neil Brimblecombe ◽  
Fiona Nolan ◽  
Mary‐Ellen Khoo ◽  
Leon Culloty ◽  
Kate O'Connor ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Mixed Methods ◽  
Mental Health Services ◽  
Health Services ◽  
Mixed Methods Study ◽  
Advanced Practice ◽  
Nurse Consultant

scholarly journals Transforming mental health services: a participatory mixed methods study to promote and evaluate the implementation of recovery-oriented services

2014 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Melissa M Park ◽  
Hiba Zafran ◽  
Janet Stewart ◽  
Jon Salsberg ◽  
Carolyn Ells ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Mixed Methods ◽  
Mental Health Services ◽  
Health Services ◽  
Mixed Methods Study

scholarly journals Stakeholder perspectives on integration of mental health services into primary care: a mixed methods study in Northern Iraq

2019 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Amanda J. Nguyen ◽  
Natalie Rykiel ◽  
Laura Murray ◽  
Ahmed Amin ◽  
Emily Haroz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Primary Care ◽  
Mixed Methods ◽  
Mental Health Services ◽  
Health Services ◽  
Mixed Methods Study ◽  
Working Environment ◽  
Government Support ◽  
Northern Iraq ◽  
Stakeholder Perspectives

Abstract Background Integrating evidence-based mental health services into primary care has been identified as one strategy for overcoming the treatment gap in low and middle-income countries, yet their uptake into standard practice remains poor. The purpose of this study was to understand stakeholder perspectives regarding barriers and facilitators to integration of mental health services into primary care settings in Northern Iraq. Methods Using a convergent mixed methods study design, quantitative and qualitative questionnaires assessed respondent perceptions of implementation factors under the domains of Autonomy, Acceptability, Appropriateness, Feasibility, Penetration/Accessibility, Sustainability, and Organizational Climate. We interviewed four types of stakeholders: clients, providers of mental health services, non-mental health (MH) staff working at the centers, and center directors. Interviews were conducted with clients at the completion of services, and with all other stakeholder groups in the latter half of the first year of program implementation, by Kurdish-speaking interviewer pairs. Qualitative and quantitative data were analyzed separately and merged using qualitative data transformation to quantify frequency of theme and integrate with quantitative findings through woven narrative. Results 123 clients, 26 providers, 40 non-MH staff, and 12 directors provided data. Positive perceptions of the program’s acceptability, appropriateness, feasibility, and positive impacts were reported across all stakeholder levels. Providers reported that the program length (8–12 sessions) was a challenge. Clients described logistical challenges (e.g.: transportation, childcare, home duties); support from family and friends appeared to be critical. Lack of private space, insufficient staffing, and need for greater government support were also important issues. Conclusions This mixed methods study is unique in its inclusion of non-MH staff and director perspectives on integration of mental health services in primary care clinics. Their inclusion proved vital since they included critical human resource barriers to feasibility. Providers reported generally positive integration experiences but that some colleagues (clinic staff not involved in mental health services) were unsupportive. Most non-MH staff were supportive, but some did report negative impacts on their working environment. Future studies of integration of mental health services into other service platforms should include the perspectives of stakeholders not involved in provision of mental health services.

scholarly journals Promoting recovery-oriented practice in mental health services: a quasi-experimental mixed-methods study

2013 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Helen Gilburt ◽  
Mike Slade ◽  
Victoria Bird ◽  
Sheri Oduola ◽  
Tom KJ Craig
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Mixed Methods ◽  
Mental Health Services ◽  
Health Services ◽  
Mixed Methods Study ◽  
Quasi Experimental

scholarly journals Impact of the COVID‐19 pandemic on Older Adults Mental Health Services: A mixed methods study

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rohan Bhome ◽  
Jonathan Huntley ◽  
Christian Dalton‐ Locke ◽  
Norha Vera San Juan ◽  
Sian Oram ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Older Adults ◽  
Mixed Methods ◽  
Mental Health Services ◽  
Health Services ◽  
Mixed Methods Study

scholarly journals Linking a research register to clinical records in older adults’ mental health services: a mixed-methods study

2015 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 15
Author(s):  
Dan Robotham ◽  
Joanne Evans ◽  
Andrew Watson ◽  
Iain Perdue ◽  
Thomas Craig ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Older Adults ◽  
Mixed Methods ◽  
Mental Health Services ◽  
Health Services ◽  
Mixed Methods Study ◽  
Research Register ◽  
Clinical Records

scholarly journals Suicide risk assessment in UK mental health services: a national mixed-methods study

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (12) ◽  
pp. 1046-1053 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jane Graney ◽  
Isabelle M Hunt ◽  
Leah Quinlivan ◽  
Cathryn Rodway ◽  
Pauline Turnbull ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Risk Assessment ◽  
Mixed Methods ◽  
Mental Health Services ◽  
Health Services ◽  
Suicide Risk ◽  
Mixed Methods Study ◽  
Suicide Risk Assessment
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document