A universal DNA extraction and PCR amplification method for fungal rDNA sequence-based identification

Mycoses ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 57 (10) ◽  
pp. 612-622 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. M. Romanelli ◽  
J. Fu ◽  
M. L. Herrera ◽  
B. L. Wickes
1999 ◽  
Vol 216 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 243-249 ◽  
Author(s):  
Oscar F. Cubero ◽  
Ana Crespo ◽  
Jamshid Fatehi ◽  
Paul D. Bridge

2011 ◽  
Vol 32 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 394-397 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hongwei Li ◽  
Haiyue Xu ◽  
Chunjiang Zhao ◽  
Yiming Sulaiman ◽  
Changxin Wu

2021 ◽  
Vol 948 (1) ◽  
pp. 012013
Author(s):  
F Fitriyah ◽  
Y Faramitha ◽  
D A Sari ◽  
I Kresnawaty ◽  
T Panji ◽  
...  

Abstract Molecular approach plays important role in species identification for microalgae which involves sequencing of specific DNA barcode present in the genome. This approach involved preparation of template DNA for polymerase chain reaction (PCR) which is time consuming and requires large amounts of algal cells. Microalgal direct PCR have been used frequently for species identification, which simplified the DNA isolation procedure. However, the recent attempts to amplify the rbcL gene of microalga using the previously reported protocol led to poor repeatability. In this study, Nannochloropsis gaditana NIES-2587 was cultured in f/2 liquid medium. The culture growth was estimated on optical density value and the lysis process was improved using gradual temperature procedure during the PCR process. The same culture was extracted using manual DNA extraction method for comparison. The DNA obtained from both methods were amplified using RbclN primer pair to amplify 1486 bp partial sequence of Nannochloropsis rbcL gene, followed by the sequencing of the PCR product. Molecular identification based on the sequence result and BLAST analysis indicated that direct PCR and manual DNA extraction methods successfully produced high sequences result and confirmed the identity of microalgae species into N. gaditana strain CCMP527 with a genetic similarity of >99%.


Author(s):  
Yongxun Wong ◽  
Boon Kiat Ng ◽  
Kevin Wai Yin Chong ◽  
Wei Siong Holden Lim ◽  
Afiqah Razanah Rosli ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Dwiyitno Dwiyitno ◽  
Stefan Hoffman ◽  
Koen Parmentier ◽  
Chris Van Keer

Fish and seafood products has been commonly targeted for fraudulent activities. For that reason, authentication of fish and seafood products is important to protect consumers from fraudulent and adulteration practices, as well as to implement traceability regulation. From the viewpoint of food safety, authenticity is beneficial to protect public from serious food poisoning incidents, such as due to ingestion of toxic species. Since DNA based identification depends on the nucleic acid polymerase chain reaction (PCR), the quantity and quality/purity of DNA will contribute significantly to the species authentication. In the present study, different DNA extraction and purification methods (3 classical methods and one commercial kit) were compared to produce the better isolated DNA for PCR amplification. Additionally, different methods for the estimation of DNA concentration and purity which is essential for PCR amplification efficiency were also evaluated. The result showed that classical DNA extraction methods (based on TNES-Urea) yielded a higher amount of DNA (11.30-323.60 ng/g tissue) in comparison to commercial kit/Wizard Promega (5.70-83.45 ng/g tissue). Based on the purity of DNA extract (A260/280), classical DNA extraction method produced relatively similar on DNA quality to the commercial kit (1.79-2.12). Interestingly, all classical methods produced DNA with A260/280 ratio of more than 2.00 on the blue mussel, in contrast with commercial kit. The commercial kit also produced better quality of DNA compared to the classical methods, showing the higher efficiency in PCR amplification. NanoDrop is promising as cheap, robust and safe UV-spectrophotometer method for DNA quantification, as well as the purity evaluation.Keywords: seafood authenticity, DNA isolation, polymerase chain reaction, NanoDrop, Picogreen


1998 ◽  
Vol 64 (12) ◽  
pp. 5064-5066 ◽  
Author(s):  
Clifford F. Brunk ◽  
Nicole Eis

ABSTRACT Comparative PCR amplification of small-subunit (SSU) rRNA gene (rDNA) sequences indicates substantial preferential PCR amplification of pJP27 sequences with korarchaeote-specific PCR primers. The coamplification of a modified SSU rDNA sequence can be used as an internal standard to determine the amount of a specific SSU rDNA sequence.


2021 ◽  
Vol 4 ◽  
Author(s):  
Valentin Vasselon ◽  
Éva Ács ◽  
Salomé Almeida ◽  
Karl Andree ◽  
Laure Apothéloz-Perret-Gentil ◽  
...  

During the past decade genetic approaches have been developed to monitor biodiversity in aquatic ecosystems. These enable access to taxonomic and genetic information from biological communities using DNA from environmental samples (e.g. water, biofilm, soil) and methods based on high-throughput sequencing technologies, such as DNA metabarcoding. Within the context of the Water Framework Directive (WFD), such approaches could be applied to assess Biological Quality Elements (BQE). These are used as indicators of the ecological status of aquatic ecosystems as part of national monitoring programs of the european network of 110,000 surface water monitoring sites with 79.5% rivers and 11% lake sites (Charles et al. 2020). A high-throughput method has the potential to increase our spatio-temporal monitoring capacity and to accelerate the transfer of information to water managers with the aim to increase protection of aquatic ecosystems. Good progress has been made with developing DNA metabarcoding approaches for benthic diatom assemblages. Technological innovation and protocol optimization have allowed robust taxonomic (species) and genetic (OTU, ESV) information to be obtained from which diatom quality indices can be calculated to infer ecological status to rivers and lakes. Diatom DNA metabarcoding has been successfully applied for biomonitoring at the scale of national river monitoring networks in several countries around the world and can now be considered technically ready for routine application (e.g. Apothéloz-Perret-Gentil et al. 2017, Bailet et al. 2019, Mortágua et al. 2019, Vasselon et al. 2019, Kelly et al. 2020, Pérez-Burillo et al. 2020, Pissaridou et al. 2021). However, protocols and methods used by each laboratory still vary between and within countries, limiting their operational transferability and the ability to compare results. Thus, routine use of DNA metabarcoding for diatom biomonitoring requires standardization of all steps of the metabarcoding procedure, from the sampling to the final ecological status assessment in order to define good practices and standards. Following previous initiatives which resulted in a CEN technical report for biofilm sampling and preservation (CEN 2018), a set of experiments was initiated during the DNAqua-Net WG2 diatom workshop (Cyprus, 2019) to focus on DNA extraction and PCR amplification steps in order to evaluate: i) the transferability and reproducibility of a protocol between different laboratories; ii) the variability introduced by different protocols currently applied by the scientific community. 19 participants from 14 countries performed DNA extraction and PCR amplification in parallel, using i) the same fixed protocol and ii) their own protocol. Experiments were performed by each participant on a set of standardized DNA and biofilm samples (river, lake, mock community). In order to specifically test the variability of DNA extraction and PCR amplification steps, all other steps of the metabarcoding process were fixed and the preparation of the Miseq sequencing was performed by only one laboratory. The variability within and between participants will be evaluated on DNA extracts quantity, taxonomic (genus, species) and genetic richness, community structure comparison and diatom quality index scores (IPS). We will also evaluate the variability introduced by different DNA extraction and PCR amplification protocols on diatom quality index scores and the final ecological status assessment. The results from this collaborative work will not serve to define “one protocol to rule them all”, but will provide valuable information to define guidelines and minimum requirements that should be considered when performing diatom metabarcoding for biomonitoring.


2008 ◽  
Vol 72 (2) ◽  
pp. 124-132 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jordan M. Nechvatal ◽  
Jeffrey L. Ram ◽  
Marc D. Basson ◽  
Phanramphoei Namprachan ◽  
Stephanie R. Niec ◽  
...  

2007 ◽  
Vol 31 (S1) ◽  
pp. 225-227 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. Cremonesi ◽  
C. Vimercati ◽  
G. Pisoni ◽  
G. Perez ◽  
A. Miranda Ribera ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document