Assessment of Adequate Safety Margin Using Single Coupling Interval-Upper Limit of Vulnerability Test

2013 ◽  
Vol 37 (1) ◽  
pp. 95-103 ◽  
Author(s):  
MEHUL B. PATEL ◽  
KHYATI PANDYA ◽  
RANJAN K. THAKUR

1986 ◽  
Vol 18 (4-5) ◽  
pp. 233-244 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. E. Portmann ◽  
R. Lloyd

For centuries the sea has absorbed a variety of inputs from rivers, streams, salt marshes and the atmosphere. It is generally accepted that additional limited inputs by man are unlikely to have a significant effect on the marine environment. Various control systems have been constructed to provide a framework within which the regulation of anthropogenic inputs can be achieved. These are briefly reviewed. With care, and in the light of past experience in both freshwater and marine environments, reasonable assumptions or estimations can be applied where uncertainties exist; safe limits can therefore be set for discharges. Case histories are used to illustrate the contention that it is possible to assess the assimilative capacity of a marine area to receive wastes. There is a major distinction to be drawn between contamination and pollution of the marine environment. Moreover, acknowledgement of the assimilative capacity concept in the marine environment does not automatically provide dischargers with the right to utilise that capacity either in part or to the upper limit. What it does is indicate the upper limit which must not be exceeded if pollution is to be avoided, and provide an indication to the control authority of the safety margin involved in the discharge limits they set accordingly.



2007 ◽  
Vol 101 (10) ◽  
pp. 1049-1057 ◽  
Author(s):  
Crystal M. Ripplinger ◽  
Wenwen Li ◽  
Jennifer Hadley ◽  
Junjie Chen ◽  
Florence Rothenberg ◽  
...  


EP Europace ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 10 (8) ◽  
pp. 907-913 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. Lemke ◽  
T. Lawo ◽  
M. Zarse ◽  
A. Lubinski ◽  
U. Kreutzer ◽  
...  






2011 ◽  
Vol 2011 ◽  
pp. 1-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicholas P. Charteris ◽  
Bradley J. Roth

Researchers have suggested that the fate of a shock-induced wave front at the edge of a “virtual anode” (a region hyperpolarized by the shock) is a key factor determining success or failure during defibrillation of the heart. In this paper, we use a simple one-dimensional computer model to examine propagation speed through a hyperpolarized region. Our goal is to test the hypothesis that rapid propagation through a virtual anode can cause failure of propagation at the edge of the virtual anode. The calculations support this hypothesis and suggest that the time constant of the sodium inactivation gate is an important parameter. These results may be significant in understanding the mechanism of the upper limit of vulnerability.



2006 ◽  
Vol 107 (3) ◽  
pp. 299-302 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nipon Chattipakorn ◽  
Krekwit Shinlapawittayatorn ◽  
Rattapong Sungnoon ◽  
Siriporn C. Chattipakorn


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document