Background: The most recent international guidelines recommended support training of chest compression (CC) using feedback devices. This study aimed to compare the training efficacy of a simplified feedback trainer with the traditional cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) simulator in CPR training.Methods: A total of 60 soldiers were randomly allocated into three groups equally, trained with a simplified external cardiac massage (ECM) trainer named Soul SheathTM (SS) (SS group), a Resusci Anne manikin (RA group), or traditional simulation training with instructor feedback, respectively. After 7 days of training, the CPR skills were tested blindly in a 2-min assessment session. The primary outcome was the proportion of effective CC, and the secondary outcome included CC rate, depth, compression position, and extent of the release.Results: The percentage of effective CC achieved in the SS group was comparable with the RA group (77.0 ± 15.52 vs. 77.5 ± 10.73%, p = 0.922), and significantly higher than that in the control group (77.0 ± 15.52 vs. 66.8 ± 16.87%, p = 0.037). Both the SS and RA groups showed better CC performance than the control group in terms of CC rate (SS group vs. control group, P = 0.032 and RA group vs. control group, P = 0.026), the proportion of shallow CC (SS group vs. control group, P = 0.011 and RA group vs. control group, P = 0.017). No difference between the SS group and RA group was found in all the CC parameters.Conclusions: The simplified ECM trainer (SS) provides a similar efficacy to the traditional manikin simulator with feedback in CC training to improve the quality of CPR skills.
Efficacy of a Simplified Feedback Trainer for High-Quality Chest Compression Training: A Randomized Controlled Simulation Study
