Outcome of antibody-mediated rejection compared to acute cellular rejection after pediatric heart transplantation

2017 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
pp. e13092 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gabrielle R. Vaughn ◽  
Neal W. Jorgensen ◽  
Yuk M. Law ◽  
Erin L. Albers ◽  
Borah J. Hong ◽  
...  
2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
I Constanso ◽  
L Nunez ◽  
M Hermida-Prieto ◽  
G M Marron-Linares ◽  
E Alvarez-Lopez ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Acute Cellular Rejection (ACR) remains a major complication in heart transplantation (HT). Since 1970, endomyocardial biopsy (EMB) has been the gold standard for ACR early detection. However, this invasive procedure has several limitations such as risk of complications, interobserver variability, false negative results and high cost. Therefore, a new non-invasive ACR biomarker is needed. Potential candidates could be microRNAs (miRs), small regulatory RNAs whose serum expression profiling could be modified in ACR patients. The aim of this study is the identification of differentially serum miRs expression patterns in ACR after HT. Methods Among HT performed in our Hospital (2013–2018), we selected patients with following criteria: i) “0R → 2R → 0R” EMB pattern for ACR (0R=no ACR, 2R=moderate ACR); ii) no antibody mediated rejection; iii) serum collected the same day as the EMBs. The 3 serum samples per patient matched in time with EMB were called “0Rs1 → 2Rs2 → 0Rs3”. In each of these serum samples, 179 miRs expression profile according manufacturer's instructions were analysed. Global Mean (GM) method was used to normalize our results expressed as miRs relative expression [2(–ΔCq)]. Expression pattern was defined as a 2 steps process: a significative rise (0Rs1 → 2Rs2) followed by a significative fall (2Rs2 → 0Rs3), or vice versa, in miR expression. Analysis of differences between 3 groups were calculated using one-way ANOVA with matched data and post-hoc Tukey test. ROC curve was generated for selected miRNA. A two-sided p<0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results 21 patients and their serum “0Rs1 → 2Rs2 → 0Rs3” samples were included in the study. Among 179 miRs analysed, 5 miRs showed significative difference between 0Rs1 and 2Rs2, 3 miRs were over-expressed (miR-181a-5p, miR-339-3p, let-7f-5p) and 2 under-expressed (miR-505-3p, miR-2110). Only miR-181a-5p met significative difference between 2Rs2 and 0Rs3 showing a statistical significative rise/fall pattern. Serum miR-181a-5p ROC analysis demonstrated significant discrimination between biopsy proven ACR from no-ACR biopsy, AUC=0.692 (p=0.0335). Differentially expressed miRs Mean relative expression 2(–ΔCq) (95% CI) Adjusted p-value (ANOVA) AUC (95% CI) 0Rs1 2Rs2 0Rs3 0Rs1 vs 2Rs2 2Rs2 vs 0Rs3 0Rs1 vs 0Rs3 miR-181–5p 0.80 (0.60–1.02) 1.11 (0.90–1.31) 0.86 (0.71–1.01) 0.0194 0.0225 NS 0.692 (0.529–0,855) Relative Expression 2(–ΔCq) and AUC expressed as mean (95% Confident Interval). NS: not significative. Conclusion Our findings suggest miR-181a-5p as a novel serological biomarker for detecting ACR after HT. After this preliminary discovery phase, miR-181a-5p is currently in a new validation phase to demonstrate its diagnostic performance. Acknowledgement/Funding This work was supported by a grant from isciii (PI15/02224) and it is part of the of the “CIBERCV”. Co-financed with FEDER Funds


2019 ◽  
Vol 24 (5) ◽  
pp. 435-441 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stormi E. Gale ◽  
Bharath Ravichandran ◽  
Van-Khue Ton ◽  
Si Pham ◽  
Brent N. Reed

The use of alemtuzumab for induction therapy in orthotopic heart transplantation remains controversial, despite its observed benefits in other transplant populations. This study aimed to evaluate whether alemtuzumab conferred a lower risk of rejection while reducing toxicities commonly attributed to standard immunosuppression in orthotopic heart transplantation. We included adult patients who underwent orthotopic heart transplantation and received induction therapy with alemtuzumab (n = 26) or standard immunosuppression (n = 26). The primary end point was freedom from grade ≥2 rejection at 12 months. Baseline characteristics were similar between the groups with the exception of poorer renal function in the alemtuzumab group ( P < .05). The primary end point of freedom from grade ≥2 rejection at 12 months was not different between alemtuzumab and standard therapy (76.9% vs 96.2%, P = .077), likely due to similarities in the rates of antibody-mediated rejection in the 2 groups. However, grade ≥2 acute cellular rejection was considerably lower with alemtuzumab (0% vs 19.2%, P = .02), as was acute cellular rejection of any severity (50% vs 7.7%, P = .004). Deterioration in renal function was significantly greater among patients receiving standard therapy as evidenced by decreases in glomerular filtration rate (−25.6 vs −9.2 mL/min, P = .032). No differences in hematologic or infectious complications were observed. In conclusion, alemtuzumab reduced several important rejection-related outcomes while ameliorating the toxicities associated with standard immunosuppression therapy, making it a promising agent for induction in orthotopic heart transplantation.


2010 ◽  
Vol 2010 ◽  
pp. 1-5
Author(s):  
Khurram Shahzad ◽  
Martin Cadeiras ◽  
Kotaro Arai ◽  
Dmitry Abramov ◽  
Elizabeth Burke ◽  
...  

In the current era of immunosuppressive medications there is increased observed incidence of graft dysfunction in the absence of known histological criteria of rejection after heart transplantation. A noninvasive molecular expression diagnostic test was developed and validated to rule out histological acute cellular rejection. In this paper we present for the first time, longitudinal pattern of changes in this novel diagnostic test score along with QTc-interval in a patient who was admitted with unexplained graft dysfunction. Patient presented with graft failure with negative findings on all known criteria of rejection including acute cellular rejection, antibody mediated rejection and cardiac allograft vasculopathy. The molecular expression test score showed gradual increase and QTc-interval showed gradual prolongation with the gradual decline in graft function. This paper exemplifies that in patients presenting with unexplained graft dysfunction, GEP test score and QTc-interval correlate with the changes in the graft function.


2021 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Cecilia Beatriz Bittencourt Viana Cruz ◽  
Ludhmila A. Hajjar ◽  
Fernando Bacal ◽  
Marco S. Lofrano-Alves ◽  
Márcio S. M. Lima ◽  
...  

An amendment to this paper has been published and can be accessed via the original article.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cecília Beatriz Bittencourt Viana Cruz ◽  
Ludhmila A. Hajjar ◽  
Fernando Bacal ◽  
Marco S. Lofrano-Alves ◽  
Márcio S.M. Lima ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Acute cellular rejection (ACR) is a major complication after heart transplantation. Endomyocardial biopsy (EMB) remains the gold standard for its diagnosis, but it has concerning complications. We evaluated the usefulness of speckle tracking echocardiography (STE) and biomarkers for detecting ACR after heart transplantation.Methods: We prospectively studied 60 transplant patients with normal left and right ventricular systolic function who underwent EMB for surveillance six months after transplantation. Sixty age- and sex-matched healthy individuals constituted the control group. Conventional echocardiographic parameters, left ventricular global longitudinal, radial and circumferential strain (LV-GLS, LV-GRS and LV-GCS, respectively), left ventricular systolic twist (LV-twist) and right ventricular free wall longitudinal strain (RV-FWLS) were analyzed just before the procedure. We also measured biomarkers at the same moment. Results: Among the included 60 patients, 17 (28%) had severe ACR (grade ≥ 2R), and 43 (72%) had no significant ACR (grade 0 – 1R). The absolute values of LV-GLS, LV-twist and RV-FWLS were lower in transplant patients with ACR degree ≥ 2 R than in those without ACR (12.5% ± 2.9% vs 14.8% ± 2.3%, p=0.002; 13.9° ± 4.8° vs 17.1° ± 3.2°, p=0.048; 21.4%± 3.2% vs 16.6% ± 2.9%, p<0.001; respectively), while no differences were observed between the LV-GRS or LV-GCS. All of these parameters were lower in the transplant group without ACR than in the nontransplant control group, except for the LV-twist. Cardiac troponin I levels were significantly higher in patients with significant ACR than in patients without significant ACR [0.19 ng/mL (0.09–1.31) vs. 0.05 ng/mL (0.01–0.18), p=0.007]. The combination of troponin with LV-GLS, RV FWLS and LV-Twist had an AUC (area under curve) for the detection of ACR of 0.80 (0.68 – 0.92), 0.89 (0.81 – 0.93) and 0.79 (0.66 – 0.92), respectively. Conclusion: Heart transplant patients have altered left ventricular dynamics compared with control individuals. The combination of troponin with strain parameters had higher accuracy for the detection of ACR than the isolated variables and this association might select patients with a higher risk for ACR who will benefit from an EMB procedure in the first year after heart transplantation.


2017 ◽  
Vol 3 (4) ◽  
pp. e149 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ruud B. van Heeswijk ◽  
Davide Piccini ◽  
Piergiorgio Tozzi ◽  
Samuel Rotman ◽  
Philippe Meyer ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document