Combining photogrammetric and bathymetric data for modelling the Niderviller canal tunnel, France

2021 ◽  
Vol 36 (175) ◽  
pp. 191-191
Keyword(s):  
2021 ◽  
Vol 146 ◽  
pp. 104301
Author(s):  
Christopher M. Yeomans ◽  
Matthew Head ◽  
Jordan J. Lindsay

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vicki Ferrini ◽  
John Morton ◽  
Lindsay Gee ◽  
Erin Heffron ◽  
Hayley Drennon ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 35 (9) ◽  
pp. 3286-3299 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiekai He ◽  
Ninghua Chen ◽  
Huaguo Zhang ◽  
Bin Fu ◽  
Xiaozhen Wang

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthieu Ribot ◽  
Yann Klinger ◽  
Sigurjón Jónsson ◽  
Ulas Avsar ◽  
Edwige Pons-Branchu ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 33-40 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Abrehdary ◽  
L. E. Sjöberg ◽  
D. Sampietro

Abstract The determination of the oceanic Moho (or crust-mantle) density contrast derived from seismic acquisitions suffers from severe lack of data in large parts of the oceans, where have not yet been sufficiently covered by such data. In order to overcome this limitation, gravitational field models obtained by means of satellite altimetry missions can be proficiently exploited, as they provide global uniform information with a sufficient accuracy and resolution for such a task. In this article, we estimate a new Moho density contrast model named MDC2018, using the marine gravity field from satellite altimetry in combination with a seismic-based crustal model and Earth’s topographic/bathymetric data. The solution is based on the theory leading to Vening Meinesz-Moritz’s isostatic model. The study results in a high-accuracy Moho density contrast model with a resolution of 1° × 1° in oceanic areas. The numerical investigations show that the estimated density contrast ranges from 14.2 to 599.7 kg/m3 with a global average of 293 kg/m3. In order to evaluate the accuracy of the MDC2018 model, the result was compared with some published global models, revealing that our altimetric model is able to image rather reliable information in most of the oceanic areas. However, the differences between this model and the published results are most notable along the coastal and polar zones, which are most likely due to that the quality and coverage of the satellite altimetry data are worsened in these regions.


Sensors ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 18 (9) ◽  
pp. 2926 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yeon Yeu ◽  
Jurng-Jae Yee ◽  
Hong Yun ◽  
Kwang Kim

Bathymetric mapping is traditionally implemented using shipborne single-beam, multi-beam, and side-scan sonar sensors. Procuring bathymetric data near coastlines using shipborne sensors is difficult, however, this type of data is important for maritime safety, marine territory management, climate change monitoring, and disaster preparedness. In recent years, the bathymetric light detection and ranging (LiDAR) technique has been tried to get seamless geospatial data from land to submarine topography. This paper evaluated the accuracy of bathymetry generated near coastlines from satellite altimetry-derived gravity anomalies and multi-beam bathymetry using a tuning density contrast of 5000 kg/m3 determined by the gravity-geologic method. Comparing with the predicted bathymetry of using only multi-beam depth data, 78% root mean square error from both multi-beam and airborne bathymetric LiDAR was improved in shallow waters of nearshore coastlines of the western Korea. As a result, the satellite-derived bathymetry estimated from the multi-beam and the airborne bathymetric LiDAR was enhanced to the accuracy of about 0.2 m.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document