scholarly journals Photoreactive DNA as a Tool to Study Replication Protein A Functioning in DNA Replication and Repair

2020 ◽  
Vol 96 (2) ◽  
pp. 440-449 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nadejda I. Rechkunova ◽  
Olga I. Lavrik
Keyword(s):  
Dna Replication ◽  
Protein A ◽  
Replication Protein A ◽  
Replication Protein ◽  
Dna Replication And Repair

scholarly journals Human RPA activates BLM’s bidirectional DNA unwinding from a nick

eLife ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhenheng Qin ◽  
Lulu Bi ◽  
Xi-Miao Hou ◽  
Siqi Zhang ◽  
Xia Zhang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Repair ◽  
Dna Replication ◽  
Single Molecule ◽  
Genome Stability ◽  
Protein A ◽  
Replication Protein A ◽  
Replication Protein ◽  
High Abundance ◽  
Dna Unwinding ◽  
Dna Replication And Repair

BLM is a multifunctional helicase that plays critical roles in maintaining genome stability. It processes distinct DNA substrates, but not nicked DNA, during many steps in DNA replication and repair. However, how BLM prepares itself for diverse functions remains elusive. Here, using a combined single-molecule approach, we find that a high abundance of BLMs can indeed unidirectionally unwind dsDNA from a nick when an external destabilizing force is applied. Strikingly, human replication protein A (hRPA) not only ensures that limited quantities of BLMs processively unwind nicked dsDNA under a reduced force but also permits the translocation of BLMs on both intact and nicked ssDNAs, resulting in a bidirectional unwinding mode. This activation necessitates BLM targeting on the nick and the presence of free hRPAs in solution whereas direct interactions between them are dispensable. Our findings present novel DNA unwinding activities of BLM that potentially facilitate its function switching in DNA repair.

scholarly journals Stabilization of a G-Quadruplex from Unfolding by Replication Protein A Using Potassium and the Porphyrin TMPyP4

2011 ◽  
Vol 2011 ◽  
pp. 1-13 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aishwarya Prakash ◽  
Fabien Kieken ◽  
Luis A. Marky ◽  
Gloria E. O. Borgstahl
Keyword(s):  
Dna Replication ◽  
Protein A ◽  
Thermal Stabilization ◽  
Replication Protein A ◽  
Replication Protein ◽  
Unique Problem ◽  
Ssdna Binding ◽  
Binding Domains ◽  
G Quadruplex ◽  
Stabilization Effect

Replication protein A (RPA) plays an essential role in DNA replication by binding and unfolding non-canonical single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) structures. Of the six RPA ssDNA binding domains (labeled A-F), RPA-CDE selectively binds a G-quadruplex forming sequence (5′-TAGGGGAAGGGTTGGAGTGGGTT-3′called Gq23). In K+, Gq23 forms a mixed parallel/antiparallel conformation, and in Na+Gq23 has a less stable (TMlowered by ∼20∘C), antiparallel conformation. Gq23 is intramolecular and 1D NMR confirms a stable G-quadruplex structure in K+. Full-length RPA and RPA-CDE-core can bind and unfold the Na+form of Gq23 very efficiently, but complete unfolding is not observed with the K+form. Studies with G-quadruplex ligands, indicate that TMPyP4 has a thermal stabilization effect on Gq23 in K+, and inhibits complete unfolding by RPA and RPA-CDE-core. Overall these data indicate that G-quadruplexes present a unique problem for RPA to unfold and ligands, such as TMPyP4, could possibly hinder DNA replication by blocking unfolding by RPA.

scholarly journals Formation of a Complex between Nucleolin and Replication Protein a after Cell Stress Prevents Initiation of DNA Replication

2000 ◽  
Vol 149 (4) ◽  
pp. 799-810 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yaron Daniely ◽  
James A. Borowiec
Keyword(s):  
Dna Replication ◽  
Ribosome Biogenesis ◽  
Protein A ◽  
Simian Virus 40 ◽  
Replication Protein A ◽  
Cell Stress ◽  
Replication Protein ◽  
Binding Studies

We used a biochemical screen to identify nucleolin, a key factor in ribosome biogenesis, as a high-affinity binding partner for the heterotrimeric human replication protein A (hRPA). Binding studies in vitro demonstrated that the two proteins physically interact, with nucleolin using an unusual contact with the small hRPA subunit. Nucleolin significantly inhibited both simian virus 40 (SV-40) origin unwinding and SV-40 DNA replication in vitro, likely by nucleolin preventing hRPA from productive interaction with the SV-40 initiation complex. In vivo, use of epifluorescence and confocal microscopy showed that heat shock caused a dramatic redistribution of nucleolin from the nucleolus to the nucleoplasm. Nucleolin relocalization was concomitant with a tenfold increase in nucleolin–hRPA complex formation. The relocalized nucleolin significantly overlapped with the position of hRPA, but only poorly with sites of ongoing DNA synthesis. We suggest that the induced nucleolin–hRPA interaction signifies a novel mechanism that represses chromosomal replication after cell stress.

The ionizing radiation-induced replication protein A phosphorylation response differs between ataxia telangiectasia and normal human cells

1993 ◽  
Vol 13 (12) ◽  
pp. 7222-7231
Author(s):  
V F Liu ◽  
D T Weaver
Keyword(s):  
Dna Repair ◽  
Ionizing Radiation ◽  
Gamma Irradiation ◽  
Ataxia Telangiectasia ◽  
Protein A ◽  
Replication Protein A ◽  
Replication Protein ◽  
Inherited Disease ◽  
Dna Replication And Repair ◽  
In Cells

Replication protein A (RPA), the trimeric single-stranded DNA-binding protein complex of eukaryotic cells, is important to DNA replication and repair. Phosphorylation of the p34 subunit of RPA is modulated by the cell cycle, occurring during S and G2 but not during G1. The function of phosphorylated p34 remains unknown. We show that RPA p34 phosphorylation is significantly induced by ionizing radiation. The phosphorylated form, p36, is similar if not identical to the phosphorylated S/G2 form. gamma-Irradiation-induced phosphorylation occurs without new protein synthesis and in cells in G1. Mutation of cdc2-type protein kinase phosphorylation sites in p34 eliminates the ionizing radiation response. The gamma-irradiation-induced phosphorylation of RPA p34 is delayed in cells from ataxia telangiectasia, a human inherited disease conferring DNA repair defects and early-onset tumorigenesis. UV-induced phosphorylation of RPA p34 occurs less rapidly than gamma-irradiation-induced phosphorylation but is kinetically similar between ataxia telangiectasia and normal cells. This is the first time that modification of a repair protein, RPA, has been linked with a DNA damage response and suggests that phosphorylation may play a role in regulating DNA repair pathways.

scholarly journals Recruitment of Replication Protein A by the Papillomavirus E1 Protein and Modulation by Single-Stranded DNA

2004 ◽  
Vol 78 (4) ◽  
pp. 1605-1615 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yueh-Ming Loo ◽  
Thomas Melendy
Keyword(s):  
Dna Replication ◽  
Protein A ◽  
Replication Protein A ◽  
T Antigen ◽  
Replication Protein ◽  
Enzyme Linked Immunosorbent Assay ◽  
Physical Interaction ◽  
Single Stranded Dna ◽  
Ssdna Binding ◽  
Papillomavirus Dna

ABSTRACT With the exception of viral proteins E1 and E2, papillomaviruses depend heavily on host replication machinery for replication of their viral genome. E1 and E2 are known to recruit many of the necessary cellular replication factors to the viral origin of replication. Previously, we reported a physical interaction between E1 and the major human single-stranded DNA (ssDNA)-binding protein, replication protein A (RPA). E1 was determined to bind to the 70-kDa subunit of RPA, RPA70. In this study, using E1-affinity coprecipitation and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay-based interaction assays, we show that E1 interacts with the major ssDNA-binding domain of RPA. Consistent with our previous report, no measurable interaction between E1 and the two smaller subunits of RPA was detected. The interaction of E1 with RPA was substantially inhibited by ssDNA. The extent of this inhibition was dependent on the length of the DNA. A 31-nucleotide (nt) oligonucleotide strongly inhibited the E1-RPA interaction, while a 16-nt oligonucleotide showed an intermediate level of inhibition. In contrast, a 10-nt oligonucleotide showed no observable effect on the E1-RPA interaction. This inhibition was not dependent on the sequence of the DNA. Furthermore, ssDNA also inhibited the interaction of RPA with papillomavirus E2, simian virus 40 T antigen, human polymerase alpha-primase, and p53. Taken together, our results suggest a potential role for ssDNA in modulating RPA-protein interactions, in particular, the RPA-E1 interactions during papillomavirus DNA replication. A model for recruitment of RPA by E1 during papillomavirus DNA replication is proposed.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document