Reducing caesarean delivery: An economic evaluation of routine induction of labour at 39 weeks in low‐risk nulliparous women

2019 ◽  
Vol 34 (1) ◽  
pp. 3-11
Author(s):  
Emily J. Callander ◽  
Debra K. Creedy ◽  
Jenny Gamble ◽  
Haylee Fox ◽  
Jocelyn Toohill ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
pp. 27-31
Author(s):  
Selina Tsz-Ching Lee ◽  
Winnie Wai-Yan Yeung ◽  
Kwok-Yin Leung

2016 ◽  
Vol 61 (2) ◽  
pp. 235-241 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeremy L. Neal ◽  
Nancy K. Lowe ◽  
Amy S. Nacht ◽  
Kate Koschoreck ◽  
Jessica Anderson

2013 ◽  
Vol 2013 ◽  
pp. 1-9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gianpaolo Maso ◽  
Monica Piccoli ◽  
Marcella Montico ◽  
Lorenzo Monasta ◽  
Luca Ronfani ◽  
...  

The aim of the study was to identify which groups of women contribute to interinstitutional variation of caesarean delivery (CD) rates and which are the reasons for this variation. In this regard, 15,726 deliveries from 11 regional centers were evaluated using the 10-group classification system. Standardized indications for CD in each group were used. Spearman’s correlation coefficient was used to calculate (1) relationship between institutional CD rates and relative sizes/CD rates in each of the ten groups/centers; (2) correlation between institutional CD rates and indications for CD in each of the ten groups/centers. Overall CD rates correlated with both CD rates in spontaneous and induced labouring nulliparous women with a single cephalic pregnancy at term (P=0.005). Variation of CD rates was also dependent on relative size and CD rates in multiparous women with previous CD, single cephalic pregnancy at term (P<0.001). As for the indications, “cardiotocographic anomalies” and “failure to progress” in the group of nulliparous women in spontaneous labour and “one previous CD” in multiparous women previous CD correlated significantly with institutional CD rates (P=0.021,P=0.005, andP<0.001, resp.). These results supported the conclusion that only selected indications in specific obstetric groups accounted for interinstitutional variation of CD rates.


Birth ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 44 (1) ◽  
pp. 21-28 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patricia A. Janssen ◽  
Jozette J. C. Stienen ◽  
Rollin Brant ◽  
Gillian E. Hanley

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document