Single implant overdenture reinforced with a metallic framework: A 2‐year clinical follow‐up

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mayara Abreu Pinheiro ◽  
Camilla Fraga do Amaral ◽  
Ingrid Andrade Meira ◽  
Talita Malini Carletti ◽  
Mariana Barbosa Câmara‐Souza ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Implant Overdenture ◽  
Single Implant

scholarly journals Repercussion of Conventional Complete Mandibular Denture Versus Single Implant Over-Denture on Retention and Biting Force

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (D) ◽  
pp. 186-189
Author(s):  
Ahmed N. Elsherbini ◽  
Wilhelm Niedermeier
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Complete Denture ◽  
Connected Space ◽  
Mean Values ◽  
Implant Overdenture ◽  
Edentulous Patients ◽  
Single Implant

Aim: Aim of this study was the evaluate the retention and biting force of conventional complete denture and after placement of a single implant in the mandible for an implant retained over-denture Material and methods Eight completely edentulous patients were selected. A single implant was inserted at the symphysis of the mandible and left to osseointergrate. During the osseointegration period a conventional complete denture was fabricated and inserted. Retention and biting force was measured at insertion and after 3 months of service. After osseointegration attachment was connected, space was formed in the fitting surface of the existing mandibular denture and retention silicon was placed. Retention and biting force were measured at insertion and after 3 months follow-up. Data were collected and statistically analyzed. Results: The retention mean values for the complete denture was 2.420±0.360, however the retention mean values for the single implant over-denture was 6.395±0.289.  F=3.80 with statically significance difference between the groups of P <0.01. The biting force mean values for the complete denture was 52.62±2.71, however the biting force mean values for single implant over-denture was 71.45±2.73. F= 1.790 with statically insignificance difference between the groups of P >0.01 Conclusion: Single implant overdenture improved the retention and the biting force when compared with the complete denture, this has improved the quality of life and happiness.

scholarly journals Aesthetic Outcomes and Peri-Implant Health of Angled Screw Retained Implant Restorations Compared with Cement Retained Crowns: Medium Term Follow-Up

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 35
Author(s):  
Livia Nastri ◽  
Ludovica Nucci ◽  
Vincenzo Grassia ◽  
Rino Miraldi
Keyword(s):  
Bone Loss ◽  
Functional Results ◽  
Technical Solution ◽  
Marginal Bone Loss ◽  
Single Tooth ◽  
Natural Teeth ◽  
The Aesthetic ◽  
Single Implant ◽  
Single Tooth Implant

Single tooth implant restorations in the aesthetic area are a demanding challenge. If a complete osseointegration is mandatory, the final result has to result in a higher standard of biomimetic and soft tissue health among natural teeth. This outcome is traditionally pursued by cementing crowns over individualized abutments. However, in recent years, the need for controlling peri-implant health and the preference towards a retrievable solution has led to an increase in screw-retained crowns, which is not always applicable when the implant axis is not ideal. In the aesthetic area, the use of a novel technical solution represented by the angled screw channel (ASC) of the abutment has been proposed in order to match the advantages of the screwed solution with the aesthetic demands. The aim of this study was to compare ASC crowns to cemented crowns (CC) in single implant restorations using the white esthetic score (WES) and pink esthetic score (PES) at the crown delivery and at a follow-up of a minimum of 2 years. Peri-implant health and marginal bone loss (MBL) were also evaluated. The mean follow-up was 44.3 months, with a mean MBL of 0.22 mm in the ASC group and 0.29 mm in the CC group. The total WES/PES score was 16.6 for ASC, compared with 17.3 for CC at baseline, and 16.2 and 17.1, respectively, at follow-up. Both of the groups reached a high WES/PES, and this was maintained over time, without signs of peri-implant diseases or bone loss, regardless of the choice of connection. In conclusion, ASC can be adopted in cases where the implant axis is not ideal, with aesthetic and functional results that are comparable to implants restored by cemented crowns.

scholarly journals OT-Equator® Attachments Comparison for Retaining an Early Loaded Implant Overdenture on Two or Three Implants: 1 Year RCT Preliminary Data

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (18) ◽  
pp. 8601
Author(s):  
Marco Tallarico ◽  
Gabriele Cervino ◽  
Marco Montanari ◽  
Roberto Scrascia ◽  
Emiliano Ferrari ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Marginal Bone Loss ◽  
Patient Centered ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial ◽  
Long Term Follow Up ◽  
Implant Overdenture

The purpose of this multicenter randomized controlled trial was to compare the clinical, radiographic, and patient-centered outcomes of early loaded mandibular overdentures deliberately placed on two or three implants. The outcomes were: implant and prosthesis success and survival rates; biological and technical complications; marginal bone loss; patient satisfaction; and periodontal parameters. The results showed no differences between the groups in any of the outcomes analyzed. With the limitations of the present study, and looking at long-term follow-up, the gold standard of prosthetic rehabilitations with attachments, in agreement with the scientific community, should prefer two non-splinted implants.

scholarly journals Digital versus Analog Procedures for the Prosthetic Restoration of Single Implants: A Randomized Controlled Trial with 1 Year of Follow-Up

2018 ◽  
Vol 2018 ◽  
pp. 1-20 ◽  
Author(s):  
Francesco Mangano ◽  
Giovanni Veronesi
Keyword(s):  
Treatment Time ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Marginal Bone Loss ◽  
Digital Workflow ◽  
Digital Impressions ◽  
Monolithic Zirconia ◽  
Ceramic Crown ◽  
To Receive ◽  
Single Implant

Aim. To compare the outcome of digital versus analog procedures for the restoration of single implants. Methods. Over a two-year period (2014-2016), all patients who had been treated in a dental center with a single implant were randomly assigned to receive either a monolithic zirconia crown, fabricated with digital workflow (test group), or a metal-ceramic crown, fabricated with analog workflow (control group). All patients were followed for 1 year after the delivery of the final crown. The outcomes were success, complications, peri-implant marginal bone loss (PIMBL), patient satisfaction, and time and cost of the treatment. Results. 50 patients (22 males, 28 females; mean age 52.6±13.4 years) were randomly assigned to one of the groups (25 per group). Both workflows showed high success (92%) and low complication rate (8%). No significant differences were found in the mean PIMBL between test (0.39±0.29mm) and control (0.54±0.32mm) groups. Patients preferred digital impressions. Taking the impression took half the time in the test group (20±5min) than in the control (50±7min) group. When calculating active working time, workflow in the test group was more time-efficient than in the control group, for provisional (70±15min versus 340±37min) and final crowns (29±9min versus 260±26min). The digital procedure presented lower costs than the analog (€277.3 versus €392.2). Conclusions. No significant clinical or radiographic differences were found between digital and analog procedures; however, the digital workflow was preferred by patients; it reduced active treatment time and costs. The present study is registered in the ISRCTN (http://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN36259164) with number 36259164.

FIXED BEARING MEDIAL UNICOMPARTMENTAL ARTHROPLASTY - A FINAL OUTCOME STUDY WITH UP TO 30 YEARS FOLLOW-UP OF A SINGLE IMPLANT

The Knee ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 27 ◽  
pp. S27-S28
Author(s):  
A. Porteous ◽  
J. Smith ◽  
R. Bray ◽  
J. Robinson ◽  
P. White ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Final Outcome ◽  
Outcome Study ◽  
Fixed Bearing ◽  
Unicompartmental Arthroplasty ◽  
Single Implant

Milled Bar-Supported Implant Overdenture After Mandibular Resection: A Case Report

2009 ◽  
Vol 35 (5) ◽  
pp. 216-220 ◽  
Author(s):  
Renata Vecchiatini ◽  
Nicola Mobilio ◽  
Demis Barbin ◽  
Santo Catapano ◽  
Giorgio Calura
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Case Report ◽  
Oral Cancer ◽  
Clinical Report ◽  
Prosthesis Retention ◽  
Implant Overdenture ◽  
Oral Cancer Patients ◽  
Oral Conditions

Abstract After surgical treatment for oral cancer, patients often are affected by disfigurements, thwarted function, and psychological and social problems. Prosthodontic rehabilitation has the aim of restoring function and esthetics. Implant-supported prosthodontic rehabilitation is useful for patients with compromised residual ridge anatomy, such as patients with oral cancer following treatment. This clinical report describes the rehabilitation of a patient after mandibular resection with a milled bar-supported implant overdenture. Overdenture achieves best hygienic maintenance, easy soft tissue follow-up, and low realization cost. This rehabilitation increased prosthesis retention and stability and improved oral conditions and the patient's quality of life.

Cost estimation of single-implant treatment in the periodontally healthy patient after 16-22 years of follow-up

2014 ◽  
Vol 26 (11) ◽  
pp. 1288-1296 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Dierens ◽  
S. Vandeweghe ◽  
J. Kisch ◽  
K. Nilner ◽  
J. Cosyn ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cost Estimation ◽  
Healthy Patient ◽  
Implant Treatment ◽  
Single Implant
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document