scholarly journals What it means to be a palliative care volunteer in eight European countries: a qualitative analysis of accounts of volunteering

Author(s):  
Ros Scott ◽  
Anne Goossensen ◽  
Sheila Payne ◽  
Leena Pelttari
2020 ◽  
Vol 16 (8) ◽  
pp. 483-489
Author(s):  
Claire Hoppenot ◽  
Fay J. Hlubocky ◽  
Julie Chor ◽  
S. Diane Yamada ◽  
Nita K. Lee

PURPOSE: Malignant bowel obstruction (MBO) from gynecologic cancer is associated with increased symptoms and short survival. A gynecologic oncologist’s approach to palliative care consultation in the setting of MBO has not been well studied—it could be an opportune time for collaboration with palliative care. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This qualitative analysis of interviews with gynecologic oncologists focuses on their perspectives on palliative care consultation at the time of MBO. Interviews were analyzed using a framework analysis, and key themes and quotations were extracted. RESULTS: We interviewed 15 gynecologic oncologists from 8 institutions in Chicago. They described a variety of expectations from palliative care consultation. Most frequently, they consulted palliative care for specific questions but managed the remainder of the care. Most participants frequently consulted palliative care, but they also worried about fragmentation of care, the timing of when to introduce a new team during MBO, and the selection of appropriate patients for a limited resource. Many participants preferred earlier palliative care consultation, and many described an emotional toll of caring for patients with MBO. Palliative care consultation was most readily discussed for nonsurgical patients. CONCLUSION: Participants’ expectations of palliative care consultations during MBO varied and were not always met. We recommend strengthening communication and protocols for palliative care involvement that meet the needs of specific patient populations and physician teams for surgical and nonsurgical patients. More research is needed to better understand how to integrate palliative care into oncologic and surgical care with gynecologic oncologists.


2014 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jasper van Riet Paap ◽  
Myrra Vernooij-Dassen ◽  
Frederike Brouwer ◽  
Franka Meiland ◽  
Steve Iliffe ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 20 (2) ◽  
pp. 147-154 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rocío Rojí ◽  
Antonio Noguera-Tejedor ◽  
Fernando Pikabea-Díaz ◽  
José Miguel Carrasco ◽  
Carlos Centeno

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e22191-e22191
Author(s):  
Tim J Kruser ◽  
Jacqueline M Kruser ◽  
Jeffrey Gross ◽  
Margaret Moran ◽  
Karen Kaiser ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 18 (4) ◽  
pp. 400-410 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nathan Davies ◽  
Laura Maio ◽  
Jasper van Riet Paap ◽  
Elena Mariani ◽  
Birgit Jaspers ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 47 (5) ◽  
pp. 849-859 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chizuru Imura ◽  
Tatsuya Morita ◽  
Masashi Kato ◽  
Nobuya Akizuki ◽  
Hiroya Kinoshita ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 46 (2) ◽  
pp. 223-244 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sofia Vasilopoulou

AbstractThis article argues that radical right parties can be seen as displaying three patterns of opposition towards European integration: rejecting, conditional and compromising. These three patterns are identified through the careful examination of party attitudes on four different aspects related to European integration and the EU. These include the idea of a common identity of European peoples, the principle of cooperation at a European multilateral level, the EU policy practice and the desire to build a future European polity. In light of this conceptualization of radical right opposition to European integration, the article conducts a qualitative analysis of party literature of 12 radical right parties from 10 European countries during the latter part of the 2000s.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document