A novel multiplexed 11 locus HLA full gene amplification assay using next generation sequencing

HLA ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 95 (2) ◽  
pp. 104-116
Author(s):  
Linh Truong ◽  
Benedict Matern ◽  
Lloyd D'Orsogna ◽  
Patricia Martinez ◽  
Marcel G. J. Tilanus ◽  
...  
2017 ◽  
Vol 63 (2) ◽  
pp. 532-541 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karen Page ◽  
David S Guttery ◽  
Daniel Fernandez-Garcia ◽  
Allison Hills ◽  
Robert K Hastings ◽  
...  

Abstract BACKGROUND Breast cancer tissues are heterogeneous and show diverse somatic mutations and somatic copy number alterations (CNAs). We used a novel targeted next generation sequencing (NGS) panel to examine cell-free DNA (cfDNA) to detect somatic mutations and gene amplification in women with metastatic breast cancer (MBC). METHODS cfDNA from pretreated patients (n = 42) and 9 healthy controls were compared with matched lymphocyte DNA by NGS, using a custom 158 amplicon panel covering hot-spot mutations and CNAs in 16 genes, with further validation of results by droplet digital PCR. RESULTS No mutations were identified in cfDNA of healthy controls, whereas exactly half the patients with metastatic breast cancer had at least one mutation or amplification in cfDNA (mean 2, range 1–6) across a total of 13 genes. Longitudinal follow up showed dynamic changes to mutations and gene amplification in cfDNA indicating clonal and subclonal response to treatment that was more dynamic than cancer antigen 15-3 (CA15-3). Interestingly, at the time of blood sampling disease progression was occurring in 7 patients with erb-b2 receptor tyrosine kinase 2 (ERBB2) gene amplification in their cfDNA and 3 of these patients were human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) negative at diagnosis, suggesting clonal evolution to a more aggressive phenotype. Lastly, 6 patients harbored estrogen receptor 1 (ESR1) mutations in cfDNA, suggesting resistance to endocrine therapy. Overall 9 of 42 patients (21%) had alterations in cfDNA that could herald a change in treatment. CONCLUSIONS Targeted NGS of cfDNA has potential for monitoring response to targeted therapies through both mutations and gene amplification, for analysis of dynamic tumor heterogeneity and stratification to targeted therapy.


Oncotarget ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (22) ◽  
pp. 2273-2282
Author(s):  
Christina Schmitt ◽  
Anna-Alice Schulz ◽  
Ria Winkelmann ◽  
Kevin Smith ◽  
Peter J. Wild ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 208-208 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrea S. Teague ◽  
Benjamin R. Tan ◽  
Albert C. Lockhart ◽  
Joel Picus ◽  
Steven M. Strasberg ◽  
...  

208 Background: Pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PA) continues to have one of the worst prognoses of all malignancies, prompting the search for known oncogenic mutations that might be targets for therapy. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients with PA who had next generation sequencing (NGS) performed by the Genomics and Pathology Services laboratory at Washington University School of Medicine. Some of main genes included APC, ATM, BRAF, FLT3, NOTCH1, MET, FGFR4, MAPK1, MAP2K2, IDH1, IDH2, RET, JAK2, KRAS, NRAS, PTEN, EGFR, PIK3CA, PDGFRA, RUNX1, KIT, ALK, and TP53. Fluorescence in-site hybridization (FISH) for EGFR gene amplification, and MLL and ALK gene rearrangement was also performed. Results: Among 46 patients with adequate tissue for sequencing, 36 (78.3%) had KRAS mutations (G12D: 44.4%, G12V: 33.3%, G12R:11.1%, Q61H:5.6%, G12A:2.8% and G12R:2.8%). Out of 10 patients with wild type KRAS, 7 patients had either novel mutations or potential targetable mutations (table). TP53 mutations were seen in 73.9% of patients. Among 33 novel mutations not previously described in the COSMIC database, more than 10% are predicted to have deleterious effect by PROVEAN and SIFT. For example, a G1137R variant identified in ALK is predicted to be deleterious and damaging. Of 29 patients whose tumors underwent FISH, 3 patients had EGFR gene amplification, 1 patient had both EGFR gene amplification and ALK gene rearrangement, and 1 patient was positive for the MLL gene rearrangement. Conclusions: NGS of pancreatic cancer not only confirmed common mutations such as KRAS and TP53, but also revealed genomic alterations that may potentially be responsive to available targeted agents. The discovery of novel mutations in wild type KRAS tumors warrants further investigation. [Table: see text]


2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (05) ◽  
pp. 232-238
Author(s):  
Marcus Kleber

ZUSAMMENFASSUNGDas kolorektale Karzinom (KRK) ist einer der häufigsten malignen Tumoren in Deutschland. Einer frühzeitigen Diagnostik kommt große Bedeutung zu. Goldstandard ist hier die Koloskopie. Die aktuelle S3-Leitlinie Kolorektales Karzinom empfiehlt zum KRK-Screening den fäkalen okkulten Bluttest. Für das Monitoring von Patienten vor und nach Tumorresektion werden die Messung des Carcinoembryonalen Antigens (CEA) und der Mikrosatellitenstabilität empfohlen. Für die Auswahl der korrekten Chemotherapie scheint derzeit eine Überprüfung des Mutationsstatus, mindestens des KRAS-Gens und des BRAF-Gens, sinnvoll zu sein. Eine Reihe an neuartigen Tumormarkern befindet sich momentan in der Entwicklung, hat jedoch noch nicht die Reife für eine mögliche Anwendung in der Routinediagnostik erreicht. Den schnellsten Weg in die breite Anwendung können Next-Generation-Sequencing-basierte genetische Tests finden.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document