Normal tissue dose and risk estimates from whole and partial breast radiation techniques

2019 ◽  
Vol 26 (7) ◽  
pp. 1308-1315
Author(s):  
Sunil W. Dutta ◽  
Eric Aliotta ◽  
Clayton E. Alonso ◽  
Roy C. Bliley ◽  
Kara D. Romano ◽  
...  
2018 ◽  
Vol 30 (7) ◽  
pp. 455 ◽  
Author(s):  
Q. Ghafoor ◽  
B. Allos ◽  
R. Stevenson ◽  
S. Watkins ◽  
S. Yahya ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 64 (13) ◽  
pp. 13NT02 ◽  
Author(s):  
Keith T Griffin ◽  
Matthew M Mille ◽  
Christopher Pelletier ◽  
Mahesh Gopalakrishnan ◽  
Jae Won Jung ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 33 (3) ◽  
pp. 226 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nuri Hyun Jung ◽  
Youngseob Shin ◽  
In-Hye Jung ◽  
Jungwon Kwak

2018 ◽  
Vol 127 ◽  
pp. S500-S501
Author(s):  
W. Van Elmpt ◽  
T. Lustberg ◽  
J. Van Soest ◽  
M. Gooding ◽  
A. Dekker

2013 ◽  
Vol 40 (6Part21) ◽  
pp. 362-362
Author(s):  
H Liu ◽  
D Andrews ◽  
M Werner-Wasik ◽  
Y Xiao ◽  
Y Yu ◽  
...  

Brachytherapy ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 10 ◽  
pp. S100-S101
Author(s):  
Daniel J. Scanderbeg ◽  
Cheryl C. Saenz ◽  
Steven C. Plaxe ◽  
Edwin A. Alvarez ◽  
Michael T. McHale ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
At Risk ◽  

2020 ◽  
pp. 1-4
Author(s):  
Beshar Allos ◽  
H. Howard ◽  
Beshar Allos ◽  
D. Stange ◽  
J. Bhogal ◽  
...  

Introduction: The role and use of stereotactic radiotherapy (SABR) is evolving rapidly. A key article by Hanna et al. (2017) provides an excellent overview of current evidence and suggestion of sensible dose constraints. Given the topical nature of this discussion we present a short retrospective analysis of treating multiple lung SABR patients at our centre. Method: We retrospectively analysed toxicity, both early (within 3 months of SABR) and late, and normal tissue dose constraints on all patients who had multiple lung lesions treated with SABR (using volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) technique) at our tertiary centre over a 25-month period from April 2016 until May 2018. Results: We have treated 78 lung lesions in 37 patients with a combination of synchronous lung cancer primaries and lung metastases diagnoses. Median follow-up was 9 months. Almost all patients received treatment on the same day for multiple lesions. We report no grade 3 toxicities in any patient nor any unexpected side effects. 5 patients (14.7%) developed grade 2 pneumonitis. In all 5 patients, lung V12.5 was >20% (range 20.8-32.2%), yet only 1 patient exceeded acceptable lung V20 constraints. Regarding long-term toxicity, 66.6% of patients reported no treatment-related effects. Of 9 patients with long-term toxicity, 8 exceeded V12.5 constraint of <15%, indeed of these 5 were >20%. Lung V20 levels were acceptable for the majority of these. Local control of treated lesions at median follow-up in all comers was 86.2%. Discussion: Our findings show that multiple lung SABR is tolerable, safe with minimal long-term toxicity and acceptable early toxicity. Defining normal lung V12.5 of <15% (optimal) and <20% (acceptable) will significantly reduce the risk of pneumonitis and longer-term toxicity, proving itself more predictive than lung V20 levels for toxicity. Additionally, treating multiple lesions concurrently appears to bare no extra risk to patients.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document