Ability of positive and negative contrast computed tomographic peritoneography to delineate canine liver lobe fissures

2019 ◽  
Vol 48 (8) ◽  
pp. 1444-1449
Author(s):  
Luis R. Rivas ◽  
Gabriela S. Seiler ◽  
Ian D. Robertson ◽  
Hongyu Ryu ◽  
Kyle G. Mathews
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vijay Shah ◽  
Justyn Huang

BACKGROUND Computed tomographic coronary angiogram (CTCA) is a non-invasive test with a negative predictive value of nearly 100% for the detection of coronary artery study. While diagnostic yield of a dedicated CTCA with bubble contrast is not yet evaluated OBJECTIVE To assess the diagnostic performance of injected bubble contrast and ability to measure difference in hounsfield units and use it as a "negative contrast" in computed tomographic METHODS This is a single center, single patient study. Baseline acquisition of a non-contrast CT scan was acquired to get hounsfield unit count in the aorta and pulmonary artery- (Calcium scan protocol) 1.4 mGy (19.5 mGy/cm). Secondly, Echo contrasts (Definity) - 5mls was injected and an echocardiogram confirmed filling in the aortic region. Finally, bubble contrast (1ml air, 8mls water and 1mls blood was drawn up and agitated through a 3 way tap) - was injected, a timing run was initiated to calculate for the bubbles to opacity the pulmonary artery. The same scan protocol was used– 1.4 mGy (19.5 mGy/cm). RESULTS Hounsfield units’ difference in the aorta and pulmonary artery from baseline compared to echo contrast and bubble contrast were not significant. CONCLUSIONS We believe this is the first ever recorded case to use bubbles as CT contrast. While results were not significant, secondary to small volume of bubbles injected. Further research needs to be implemented to assess clinical difference with amount of bubbles and volume required. CLINICALTRIAL Single centre study


2017 ◽  
Vol 60 (3) ◽  
pp. E29-E32
Author(s):  
Marta Soler ◽  
Juana D. Carrillo ◽  
Eliseo Belda ◽  
Antonio Buendía ◽  
Amalia Agut

1988 ◽  
Vol 39 (1) ◽  
pp. 144-149 ◽  
Author(s):  
I STOCKLEY ◽  
C GETTY ◽  
A DIXON ◽  
I GLAVES ◽  
H EUINTON ◽  
...  

2001 ◽  
Vol 120 (5) ◽  
pp. A261-A261
Author(s):  
F CETTA ◽  
M ZUCKERMANN ◽  
G ERCOLANI ◽  
G MONTALTO ◽  
M GORI ◽  
...  

VASA ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 48 (1) ◽  
pp. 65-71 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cheong J. Lee ◽  
Rory Loo ◽  
Max V. Wohlauer ◽  
Parag J. Patel

Abstract. Although management paradigms for certain arterial trauma, such as aortic injuries, have moved towards an endovascular approach, the application of endovascular techniques for the treatment of peripheral arterial injuries continues to be debated. In the realm of peripheral vascular trauma, popliteal arterial injuries remain a devastating condition with significant rates of limb loss. Expedient management is essential and surgical revascularization has been the gold standard. Initial clinical assessment of vascular injury is aided by readily available imaging techniques such as duplex ultrasonography and high resolution computed tomographic angiography. Conventional catheter based angiography, however, remain the gold standard in the determination of vascular injury. There are limited data examining the outcomes of endovascular techniques to address popliteal arterial injuries. In this review, we examine the imaging modalities and current approaches and data regarding endovascular techniques for the management popliteal arterial trauma.


The Lancet ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 365 (9456) ◽  
pp. 305-311 ◽  
Author(s):  
D ROCKEY ◽  
E PAULSON ◽  
D NIEDZWIECKI ◽  
W DAVIS ◽  
H BOSWORTH ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document