scholarly journals Board Diversity or Tokenism: A Case for Social Inclusion and an Efficiency Model

2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 22
Author(s):  
Bello Lawal ◽  
Mohammed Nuhu

This exploratory paper examines the concept of diversity as a dynamic of board effectiveness. The study argues that diversity hardly works without putting in place systems and programmes that promote social inclusion, and, as such, research on board diversity must account for this element in building empirical frameworks and model specifications. The study finds that a great majority of previous studies have ignored this variable of significant importance and, in some instances, conflated it with diversity itself. This represents a material flaw that needs to be addressed. This paper offers guidance on how to measure and account for social inclusion and integration in board diversity research. Finally, a portfolio efficiency frontier model is proposed as a mechanism for differentiating between corporations with efficient board diversity and those that are tokenism based.

2015 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
pp. 261-276
Author(s):  
Deryl Northcott ◽  
Janine Smith

This paper examines how social (ethnic and gender) diversity influences board effectiveness and impacts the role of the chair. It draws on semi-structured interviews with New Zealand board members from two company types - stated-owned enterprises (SOEs) and public listed companies (PLCs) - where the former has greater social diversity around the board table. Few prior studies of board effectiveness have accessed the views of board members via interviews, or compared directors’ perspectives from companies of similar size but differing board diversity. The findings reveal that members of SOE boards, where there is greater social diversity, saw negative director characteristics (character and attitude) and weak board relationships as strongly negative influences on board effectiveness. This group also identified poor boardroom practice (i.e. failing to achieve a boardroom atmosphere that fosters quality debate and effective decision making) as having a significant, negative impact on board outcomes. While board members in both company types saw the chair as a key influence on both board effectiveness and ineffectiveness, the ways in which the chair was seen to exert that influence differed between the company types, suggesting that diversity impacts the role of the chair as leader of the board


Author(s):  
Thokozani Ian Nzimakwe

The structure and composition of the board are determined by the characteristics of an organisation, its environment, and its information needs. If the role of the board is to advise and supervise, this then talks to the relationships that account for its composition so that it may carry out these duties. Boards of directors are now faced with a change in the priority of the functions that must be undertaken by them, with supervision and monitoring being more important than the usual function of administration. The chapter discusses the literature on board diversity, corporate governance, role of the boards of public entities, effectiveness of boards, role of board committees, strategic leadership theory, and the impact of board diversity on board effectiveness. In terms of practical implications, the chapter makes a unique and significant contribution to the functionality of board members in South Africa. The analysis may encourage board nomination committees to seek board diversity beyond the gender and ethnic characteristics of directors.


2014 ◽  
Vol 2014 (1) ◽  
pp. 16914
Author(s):  
Gokhan Turgut ◽  
Taieb Hafsi ◽  
Eduardo Schiehll

2017 ◽  
Vol 93 (2) ◽  
pp. 339-367 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mathijs Van Peteghem ◽  
Liesbeth Bruynseels ◽  
Ann Gaeremynck

ABSTRACT Various regulatory governance initiatives have strived for board diversity, as diversity stimulates creativity, encourages discussion, and enlarges the board's knowledge base. However, increased diversity results in superior decision-making only when the board is free from conflicts and acts as a cohesive group. In this paper, we extend existing corporate governance research by introducing faultline theory to the board of directors (Lau and Murnighan 1998). The idea is to show how a board's diversity structure can give rise to the formation of subgroups along faultlines. The resulting subgroup formation may, in turn, reduce board effectiveness. Using a sample of U.S.-listed firms between 2008 and 2012, results suggest that boards with strong faultlines are associated with lower firm performance, lower CEO turnover-performance sensitivity, and higher abnormal CEO compensation. Understanding potential unintended consequences of board diversity could be of interest to regulators and companies that plan to appoint new directors to the board. JEL Classifications: G30; G38; D70; M41.


2002 ◽  
Author(s):  
Susan J. Markunas ◽  
Kristine Kelly ◽  
Autumn Wildrick ◽  
Jennifer Salamone
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document