scholarly journals Determinantes de costos de auditoría – non audit fee

2014 ◽  
Vol 15 (39) ◽  
Author(s):  
Arquimedes De Jesus Moraes ◽  
Eduardo José Pinheiro ◽  
Alexsandro Ronchi Negrelli
Keyword(s):  
Big 4 ◽  

El objetivo de esta investigación es identificardeterminantes de los costos de auditoría (non audit FEE) delas empresas brasileñas. La muestra contempló informacionesde las empresas en la BM&FBOVESPA, que resulta dela fusión entre la São Paulo Stock Exchange (Bovespa) y laBrazilian Mercantile and Futures Exchange (BM&F), entre2009 y 2012. Los resultados indican que el tamaño de laempresa auditada en el final del año fiscal está positivamenterelacionado con los gastos de consultoría; si la empresade auditoría es una Big 4, los honorarios de consultoríano poseen una relación significativa. En contrapartida, losclientes de menor tamaño tendrán costes menores de honorariosde consultoría.

2017 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 2-15 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thanyawee Pratoomsuwan

Purpose Because there is mixed evidence regarding Big N fee premiums across countries, the purpose of this paper is to re-examine the phenomenon of audit price differentiations in the market for auditing services in Thailand. Although Hay et al. (2006) and Hay (2013) reviewed over 80 audit fee papers from 20 countries over 25 years, 13 of which were based in emerging economies, the understanding of the market for auditing services in Thailand remains limited. Because the Thai auditing market is also classified as a segmented market – i.e., a market that is less competitive for large-client firms and more competitive for small-client firms – this study tests audit price competition in an emerging audit market using Thailand as an example. Design/methodology/approach The traditional audit fee model is used to estimate audit fee premiums for a sample of over 300 non-financial companies listed on the Stock Exchange of Thailand in 2011. Findings Although the market for auditing services in Thailand is consistent with that described in Ferguson et al. (2013) – in which Big N audit firms dominate only the large-client segment – the results show that Big N auditors charge higher audit fees and earn higher fee premiums compared with non-Big N auditors in both the small- and large-client segments of the audit market. Research limitations/implications The evidence from this study reveals the existence of Big N fee premiums across market segmentations. Audit price differentials between Big N and non-Big N firms in both small- and large-client market segments might concern regulators regarding competition in the audit market with respect to whether the Big N firms are charging uncompetitive audit fees. These findings also imply that audit pricing varies across countries and the Big N price deferential is typically larger in emerging markets than in more developed audit markets and that it might be inadequate to study single-country audit pricing. However, the question whether the Big N fee premium results from Big N product differentiation is not directly investigated in this study. Originality/value Because earlier studies focusing on audit fee premiums have been conducted using data from the USA and Australia, the findings add to the limited evidence regarding audit fee premiums in an emerging country such as Thailand.


2019 ◽  
Vol 17 (3) ◽  
pp. 47
Author(s):  
F. Henrique Castro ◽  
William Eid Junior ◽  
Verônica F. Santana ◽  
Claudia E. Yoshinaga

<p>We summarize the fifty-year history (1968-2017) of the Ibovespa, a gross total return index that comprises the most liquid stocks traded on the São Paulo Stock Exchange in Brazil. We provide contextual material on the Brazilian economy during this 50-year period (such as the fight against hyperinflation, the privatization of companies, and economic crises) and its impact on the index composition and performance. We discuss the effect of the change in the index calculation<br />methodology that took place in 2014, when companies with lower market capitalization became less representative in the index. Finally, we discuss the representativeness of each industry on the Ibovespa portfolio.</p>


2017 ◽  
Vol 62 (4) ◽  
pp. 1317-1334 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carol Thiago Costa ◽  
Wesley Vieira da Silva ◽  
Lauro Brito de Almeida ◽  
Claudimar Pereira da Veiga

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document