Recent developments in geometrically nonlinear and postbuckling analysis of framed structures

2003 ◽  
Vol 56 (4) ◽  
pp. 431-449 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yeong-Bin Yang ◽  
Jong-Dar Yau ◽  
Liang-Jenq Leu

Geometric nonlinear analysis of structures is not a simple extension from its counterpart of linear analysis. In this article, some research works conducted primarily in the past two decades on the geometric nonlinear analysis of framed structures that are readily available to the authors, including, in particular, those conducted by the senior author and coworkers, will be briefly reviewed. To highlight the key features of geometric nonlinear analysis, each of the papers cited will be reviewed according to one or more of the following categories: a) analytical or semi-analytical works, b) formulation of incremental nonlinear theory, c) discrete vs connected element and procedure of assembly, d) joint equilibrium conditions in the deformed configuration, e) rigid body test for nonlinear finite elements, f) key phases in incremental-iterative analysis, g) force recovery procedure, h) strategy for incremental-iterative approaches, i) rigid body-qualified geometric stiffness matrix, j) formulation and simulation for curved beam problems, k) special considerations for truss structures, and l) other related considerations. Throughout this article, emphasis will be placed on the theories and procedures leading to solution of the load-deflection response of structures, which may involve multi-looping curves in the postbuckling range. In fact, a nonlinear analysis using incremental-iterative schemes need not be as complicated as we think. If due account can be taken of the rigid body behaviors at each stage, then the whole process of incremental-iterative analysis can be made simpler and more efficient. Even when the postbuckling behavior of structures is of concern, the use of an accurate elastic stiffness matrix plus a rigid-body-qualified geometric stiffness matrix can always yield satisfactory results. There are 122 references cited in this review article.

2007 ◽  
Vol 07 (04) ◽  
pp. 571-588 ◽  
Author(s):  
Y. B. YANG ◽  
JIUNN-YIN TSAY

This paper presents a two-node catenary cable element for the analysis of three-dimensional cable-supported structures. The stiffness matrix of the catenary cable element was derived as the inverse of the flexibility matrix, with allowances for selfweight and pretension effects. The element was then included, along with the beam and truss elements, in a geometric nonlinear analysis program, for which the procedure for computing the stiffness matrix and for performing iterations was clearly outlined. With the present element, each cable with no internal joints can be modeled by a single element, even for cables with large sags, as encountered in cable nets, suspension bridges and long-span cable-stayed bridges. The solutions obtained for all the examples are in good agreement with the existing ones, which indicates the accuracy and applicability of the element presented.


2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (08) ◽  
pp. 1950094
Author(s):  
Y. Wen ◽  
Q. Tan ◽  
Z. L. Chen

There exist various potential energy formulations dealing with the linear buckling and second-order nonlinear analysis of framed structures with different degrees of refinement in the kinematic model. However, the geometric stiffnesses derived often give rise to different structural behaviors, which indeed represents a confusion regarding their qualified usage in bifurcation and post-buckling analysis. This study aims to carry out a comprehensive evaluation of the validity of the geometric stiffness for use at the predictor and corrector phrases of an incremental analysis based on the rigid-body motion test. To remove the unbalanced element forces caused by the nonqualified geometric stiffness, a supplementary correction matrix is developed according to simple kinematic and static analysis in the context of rigid rotations. An updated Lagrangian approach-based force recovery procedure (FRP) is presented for updating the element forces with improved reliability and efficiency, when using relatively large step size. Some benchmark problems which exhibit compound three-dimensional nonlinear behavior of framed structures are solved to clarify the capabilities of rigid-body qualified and nonqualified geometric stiffnesses along with the existing FRPs for different mesh sizes, step sizes and load patterns. It is shown that the proposed procedure can be adopted to predict correct buckling loads and post-buckling equilibrium paths without adding extra computational costs.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document