Effects of Prosthetic Mismatch and Subscapularis Tear on Glenohumeral Contact Patterns in Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: A Numerical Musculoskeletal Analysis

2016 ◽  
Vol 138 (12) ◽  
Author(s):  
Lauranne Sins ◽  
Patrice Tétreault ◽  
Natalia Nuño ◽  
Nicola Hagemeister

Prosthetic components' mismatch and subscapularis (SC) tear are determining factors for glenoid failure complication in nonconforming total shoulder arthroplasty (NC-TSA). Risk factors are linked to glenoid prosthetic loading. However, the mechanisms underlying the clinical observations remain unclear. This study assessed the combined impact of mismatch and subscapularis tear on glenoid loading. It was assumed that adequate glenoid loading was associated with minimal, but non-null, humeral head translations and contact pressure, as well as with maximal glenoid contact area, and that the center of pressure (COP) on the glenoid would have a centered displacement pattern. A numerical model was used to achieve two objectives. The first was to verify whether an optimum mismatch existed, for which failure risk would be minimal. The second was to explore the effect of subscapularis tear on the position of applied forces on the glenoid. A shoulder AnyBody musculoskeletal model was adapted to the arthroplasty context by introducing humeral head translations and contact between implants. Ten simulations were computed to compare combinations of varying mismatches (1.4 mm, 3.4 mm, 6.4 mm, 8.6 mm, and 9 mm) with two shoulder conditions (intact-muscle or subscapularis tear). Humeral head translations, center-of-pressure, contact area, contact pressure, and glenohumeral joint contact forces were numerically estimated. Mismatches between 3.4 mm and 6.4 mm were associated with the most minimal humeral translations and contact pressure, as well as with maximal contact area. Center of pressure displacement pattern differed according to shoulder condition, with an outward anterior tendency in presence of tear.

2015 ◽  
Vol 137 (10) ◽  
Author(s):  
Lauranne Sins ◽  
Patrice Tétreault ◽  
Nicola Hagemeister ◽  
Natalia Nuño

Current musculoskeletal inverse dynamics shoulder models have two limitations to use in the context of nonconforming total shoulder arthroplasty (NC-TSA). First, the ball and socket glenohumeral (GH) joint simplification avoids any humeral head translations. Second, there is no contact at the GH joint to compute the contact area and the center of pressure (COP) between the two components of NC-TSA. In this paper, we adapted the AnyBody™ shoulder model by introducing humeral head translations and contact between the two components of an NC-TSA. Abduction in the scapular plane was considered. The main objective of this study was to adapt the AnyBody™ shoulder model to a NC-TSA context and to compare the results of our model (translations, COP, contact area, GH joint reaction forces (GH-JRFs), and muscular forces) with previous numerical, experimental, and clinical studies. Humeral head translations and contact were successfully introduced in our adapted shoulder model with strong support for our findings by previous studies.


2009 ◽  
Vol 18 (4) ◽  
pp. 505-510 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christian Gerber ◽  
John G. Costouros ◽  
Atul Sukthankar ◽  
Sandro F. Fucentese

2013 ◽  
Vol 22 (7) ◽  
pp. 886-893 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adam Sassoon ◽  
Bradley Schoch ◽  
Peter Rhee ◽  
Cathy D. Schleck ◽  
William S. Harmsen ◽  
...  

Orthopedics ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 36 (3) ◽  
pp. e377-e380 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew F. Dilisio ◽  
Jeffrey S. Noble ◽  
Robert H. Bell ◽  
Curtis R. Noel

2019 ◽  
Vol 3 ◽  
pp. ???
Author(s):  
Matthew J Smith ◽  
Christopher M Loftis ◽  
Nathan W Skelley

Background The biconcave (B2) glenoid is characterized by preservation of the anterior portion of the native glenoid with asymmetric wear of the posterior glenoid. Surgical options for glenoid correction have evolved. The goal of shoulder arthroplasty is to place the implants in such a manner to return the humeral head to a centered position and restore the joint line to a neutral position. There is no current consensus on method of treatment and correction. Methods The current and historical literature on total shoulder arthroplasty was used to examine technique viability. Results Asymmetric remaining can be used to address up to 15° of version correction without compromise of cortical bone. It is important to have the proper presurgical planning, to understand the limitations of correction, and to have other options available to treat the biconcave glenoid.


2021 ◽  
Vol 30 (1) ◽  
pp. 51-56
Author(s):  
Ryan M. Cox ◽  
Daniel Sholder ◽  
Laura Stoll ◽  
Joseph A. Abboud ◽  
Gerald R. Williams ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 94 (19) ◽  
pp. 1777-1785 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jasvinder A. Singh ◽  
John Sperling ◽  
Cathy Schleck ◽  
William Harmsen ◽  
Robert Cofield

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
pp. 638-643
Author(s):  
Aaron M. Chamberlain ◽  
Nathan Orvets ◽  
Brendan Patterson ◽  
Peter Chalmers ◽  
Michelle Gosselin ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Jihui Li ◽  
Thomas R. Gardner ◽  
William N. Levine ◽  
Louis U. Bigliani ◽  
Christopher S. Ahmad

Today nonconforming glenohumeral implants are a common choice for total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA). Use of the conforming implant has decreased because of the “rocking-horse” effect [1], which leads to high stress and moments at the glenoid rim when the humeral head subluxes during range of motion. Retrieval studies have provided evidence that the rocking-horse effect is the major cause of implant loosening and fracture, delamination and deformation of the glenoid rim. Nonconforming glenoid implants, owing to a larger radius of the glenoid articular surface, can reduce the rocking-horse effect by improving the rim-head contact during subluxation. However, the nonconforming shape increases the contact stress and instability when the humeral head is in the central region, where motion frequently occurs [2].


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document