Entropy Generation for Bypass Transitional Boundary Layers

2017 ◽  
Vol 139 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard S. Skifton ◽  
Ralph S. Budwig ◽  
John C. Crepeau ◽  
Tao Xing
Keyword(s):  
Boundary Layer ◽  
Pressure Gradient ◽  
Flat Plate ◽  
Entropy Generation ◽  
Boundary Layer Flow ◽  
Generation Rate ◽  
Entropy Generation Rate ◽  
Transitional Region ◽  
Bypass Transition ◽  
Layer Flow

The principal purpose of this study is to understand the entropy generation rate in bypass, transitional, boundary-layer flow better. The experimental work utilized particle image velocimetry (PIV) and particle tracking velocimetry (PTV) to measure flow along a flat plate. The flow past the flat plate was under the influence of a negligible “zero” pressure gradient, followed by the installation of an adverse pressure gradient. Further, the boundary layer flow was artificially tripped to turbulence (called “bypass” transition) by means of elevated freestream turbulence. The entropy generation rate was seen to behave similar to that of published computational fluid dynamics (CFD) and direct numerical simulation (DNS) results. The observations from this work show the relative decrease of viscous contributions to entropy generation rate through the transition process, while the turbulent contributions of entropy generation rate greatly increase through the same transitional flow. A basic understanding of entropy generation rate over a flat plate is that a large majority of the contributions come within a wall coordinate less than 30. However, within the transitional region of the boundary layer, a tradeoff between viscous and turbulent dissipation begins to take place where a significant amount of the entropy generation rate is seen out toward the boundary layer edge.

Predicting Entropy Generation Rates in Transitional Boundary Layers Based on Intermittency

2006 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kevin P. Nolan ◽  
Edmond J. Walsh ◽  
Donald M. McEligot ◽  
Ralph J. Volino
Keyword(s):  
Boundary Layer ◽  
Pressure Gradient ◽  
Transition Region ◽  
Boundary Layers ◽  
Entropy Generation ◽  
Generation Rate ◽  
Entropy Generation Rate ◽  
Time Averaging ◽  
Laminar And Turbulent Flow ◽  
Intermittency Factor

Prediction of thermodynamic loss in transitional boundary layers is typically based on time averaged data only. This approach effectively ignores the intermittent nature of the transition region. In this work laminar and turbulent conditionally-sampled boundary layer data for zero pressure gradient and accelerating transitional boundary layers have been analyzed to calculate the entropy generation rate in the transition region. By weighting the non-dimensional dissipation coefficient for the laminar conditioned data and turbulent conditioned data with the intermittency factor, the entropy generation rate in the transition region can be determined and compared to the time averaged data and correlations for laminar and turbulent flow. It is demonstrated that this method provides an accurate and detailed picture of the entropy generation rate during transition in contrast with simple time averaging. The data used in this paper have been taken from conditionally-sampled boundary layer measurements available in the literature for favorable pressure gradient flows. Based on these measurements a semi-empirical technique is developed to predict the entropy generation rate in a transitional boundary layer with promising results.

Predicting Entropy Generation Rates in Transitional Boundary Layers Based on Intermittency

2006 ◽  
Vol 129 (3) ◽  
pp. 512-517 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kevin P. Nolan ◽  
Edmond J. Walsh ◽  
Donald M. McEligot ◽  
Ralph J. Volino
Keyword(s):  
Boundary Layer ◽  
Pressure Gradient ◽  
Transition Region ◽  
Boundary Layers ◽  
Entropy Generation ◽  
Generation Rate ◽  
Entropy Generation Rate ◽  
Time Averaging ◽  
Laminar And Turbulent Flow ◽  
Intermittency Factor

Prediction of thermodynamic loss in transitional boundary layers is typically based on time-averaged data only. This approach effectively ignores the intermittent nature of the transition region. In this work laminar and turbulent conditionally sampled boundary layer data for zero pressure gradient and accelerating transitional boundary layers have been analyzed to calculate the entropy generation rate in the transition region. By weighting the nondimensional dissipation coefficient for the laminar conditioned data and turbulent conditioned data with the intermittency factor, the entropy generation rate in the transition region can be determined and compared to the time-averaged data and correlations for laminar and turbulent flow. It is demonstrated that this method provides an accurate and detailed picture of the entropy generation rate during transition in contrast with simple time averaging. The data used in this paper have been taken from conditionally sampled boundary layer measurements available in the literature for favorable pressure gradient flows. Based on these measurements, a semi-empirical technique is developed to predict the entropy generation rate in a transitional boundary layer with promising results.

Second Law Analysis of Boundary Layer Flow With Variable Fluid Properties

2017 ◽  
Vol 139 (10) ◽  
Author(s):  
M. I. Afridi ◽  
M. Qasim ◽  
O. D. Makinde
Keyword(s):  
Boundary Layer ◽  
Differential Equations ◽  
Entropy Generation ◽  
Boundary Layer Flow ◽  
Numerical Solutions ◽  
Nonlinear Partial Differential Equations ◽  
Entropy Generation Rate ◽  
Bejan Number ◽  
Entropy Generation Number ◽  
Layer Flow

An entropy generation analysis of steady boundary layer flow of viscous fluid with variable properties over an exponentially stretching sheet is presented. The basic nonlinear partial differential equations that govern the flow are reduced to ordinary differential equations by using appropriate transformations. Numerical solutions are obtained by using shooting technique along with Runge–Kutta method. Expressions for the dimensionless volumetric entropy generation rate (NG) and Bejan number are also obtained. The effects of different dimensionless emerging parameters on entropy generation number (NG) and Bejan number (Be) are investigated graphically in detail.

Direct numerical simulation of turbulence in a nominally zero-pressure-gradient flat-plate boundary layer

2009 ◽  
Vol 630 ◽  
pp. 5-41 ◽  
Author(s):  
XIAOHUA WU ◽  
PARVIZ MOIN
Keyword(s):  
Boundary Layer ◽  
Reynolds Number ◽  
Shear Stress ◽  
Pressure Gradient ◽  
Flat Plate ◽  
Plate Boundary ◽  
Transitional Region ◽  
Bypass Transition ◽  
Number Range ◽  
Flat Plate Boundary Layer

A nominally-zero-pressure-gradient incompressible boundary layer over a smooth flat plate was simulated for a continuous momentum thickness Reynolds number range of 80 ≤ Reθ ≤ 940. Transition which is completed at approximately Reθ = 750 was triggered by intermittent localized disturbances arising from patches of isotropic turbulence introduced periodically from the free stream at Reθ = 80. Streamwise pressure gradient is quantified with several measures and is demonstrated to be weak. Blasius boundary layer is maintained in the early transitional region of 80 < Reθ < 180 within which the maximum deviation of skin friction from the theoretical solution is less than 1%. Mean and second-order turbulence statistics are compared with classic experimental data, and they constitute a rare DNS dataset for the spatially developing zero-pressure-gradient turbulent flat-plate boundary layer. Our calculations indicate that in the present spatially developing low-Reynolds-number turbulent flat-plate boundary layer, total shear stress mildly overshoots the wall shear stress in the near-wall region of 2–20 wall units with vanishing normal gradient at the wall. Overshoots as high as 10% across a wider percentage of the boundary layer thickness exist in the late transitional region. The former is a residual effect of the latter. The instantaneous flow fields are vividly populated by hairpin vortices. This is the first time that direct evidence (in the form of a solution of the Navier–Stokes equations, obeying the statistical measurements, as opposed to synthetic superposition of the structures) shows such dominance of these structures. Hairpin packets arising from upstream fragmented Λ structures are found to be instrumental in the breakdown of the present boundary layer bypass transition.

scholarly journals Comparative Study on Maxwell and Navier Stokes Fluid Equations with Pressure Gradient Over a Flat Plate for Convective Boundary Layer Flow and Heat Transfer

MATEMATIKA ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 34 (1) ◽  
pp. 31-47
Author(s):  
Amber Nehan Kashif ◽  
Zainal Abdul Aziz
Keyword(s):  
Boundary Layer ◽  
Relaxation Time ◽  
Pressure Gradient ◽  
Flat Plate ◽  
Convective Boundary Layer ◽  
Boundary Layer Flow ◽  
Approximation Technique ◽  
Convective Boundary ◽  
Gradient Parameter ◽  
Layer Flow

In this article, Maxwell fluid over a flat plate for convective boundary layer flow with pressure gradient parameter is considered. The aim of this study is to compare and analyze the effects of the presence and absence of λ (relaxation time), and also the effects of m (pressure gradient parameter) and Pr (Prandtl number) on the momentum and thermal boundary layer thicknesses. An approximation technique namely Homotopy Perturbation Method (HPM) has been used with an implementation of Adam and Gear Method’s algorithms. The obtained results have been compared for zero relaxation time and also pressure gradient parameter with the published work of Fathizadeh and Rashidi. The current outcomes are found to be in good agreement with the published results. Physical interpretations have been given for the effects of the m, Pr and β (Deborah number) with λ. This study will play an important role in industrial and engineering applications.

NATURAL CONVECTION BOUNDARY LAYER FLOW PAST A FLAT PLATE OF FINITE DIMENSIONS

2012 ◽  
Vol 15 (6) ◽  
pp. 585-593
Author(s):  
M. Jana ◽  
S. Das ◽  
S. L. Maji ◽  
Rabindra N. Jana ◽  
S. K. Ghosh
Keyword(s):  
Boundary Layer ◽  
Natural Convection ◽  
Flat Plate ◽  
Boundary Layer Flow ◽  
Convection Boundary Layer ◽  
Flow Past ◽  
Convection Boundary ◽  
Layer Flow
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document