Hip Joint Contact Forces During Running with a Transtibial Amputation

Author(s):  
Lauren Sepp ◽  
Brian S Baum ◽  
Erika Nelson-Wong ◽  
Anne Silverman

Abstract People with unilateral transtibial amputations (TTA) have greater risks of bilateral hip osteoarthritis, related to asymmetric biomechanics compared to people without TTA. Running is beneficial for physical health and is gaining popularity. However, people with TTA may not have access to running-specific prostheses (RSPs), which are designed for running, and may instead run using their daily-use prosthesis (DUP). Differences in joint loading may result from prosthesis choice, thus it is important to characterize changes in peak and impulsive hip joint contact loading during running. Six people with and without TTA ran at 3.5 m/s while ground reaction forces, kinematics, and electromyography were collected. People with TTA ran using their own RSP and repeated the protocol using their own DUP. Musculoskeletal models incorporating prosthesis type of each individual were used to quantify individual muscle forces and hip joint contact forces during running. People using RSPs had smaller bilateral peak hip joint contact forces compared to when wearing DUPs during stance and swing, and a smaller impulse over the entire gait cycle. Greater amputated leg peak hip joint contact forces for people wearing DUPs compared to RSPs occurred with greater forces from the ipsilateral gluteus maximus during stance. People with TTA also had greater bilateral peak hip joint contact forces during swing compared to people without TTA, which occurred with greater peak gluteus medius forces. Running with more compliant RSPs may be beneficial for long-term joint health by reducing peak and impulsive hip loading compared to DUPs.

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Takuma Inai ◽  
Tomoya Takabayashi ◽  
Mutsuaki Edama ◽  
Masayoshi Kubo

Abstract Background: Excessive mechanical loading, in the form of the joint contact force, has been reported to promote osteoarthritis in vitro and vivo in mice. However, it has also been reported that an excessive hip adduction moment impulse during the stance phase likely contributes to the progression of hip osteoarthritis. The relationship between the hip adduction moment impulse and hip joint contact force (impulse, and first and second peaks) during the stance phase is unclear. The objective of the present study was to clarify this relationship. Methods: A public dataset pertaining to the overground walking of 84 healthy adults, in which the participants walked at a self-selected speed, was considered. The data of three trials for each participant were analyzed. The relationship between the hip adduction moment and hip joint contact force, in terms of the impulse and first and second peaks, during the stance phase was evaluated using correlation coefficients.Results: The hip adduction moment impulse during the stance phase was positively correlated with the hip joint contact force impulse and not correlated with the first and second peak hip joint contact forces. Furthermore, the first and second peak hip adduction moments during the stance phase were positively correlated with the first and second peak hip joint contact forces, respectively. Conclusions: These findings indicate that the hip joint contact force impulse during the stance phase can be used as an index to determine the risk factors for the progression of hip osteoarthritis.


2021 ◽  
Vol 3 ◽  
Author(s):  
Callum Buehler ◽  
Willi Koller ◽  
Florentina De Comtes ◽  
Hans Kainz

An increase in hip joint contact forces (HJCFs) is one of the main contributing mechanical causes of hip joint pathologies, such as hip osteoarthritis, and its progression. The strengthening of the surrounding muscles of the joint is a way to increase joint stability, which results in the reduction of HJCF. Most of the exercise recommendations are based on expert opinions instead of evidence-based facts. This study aimed to quantify muscle forces and joint loading during rehabilitative exercises using an elastic resistance band (ERB). Hip exercise movements of 16 healthy volunteers were recorded using a three-dimensional motion capture system and two force plates. All exercises were performed without and with an ERB and two execution velocities. Hip joint kinematics, kinetics, muscle forces, and HJCF were calculated based on the musculoskeletal simulations in OpenSim. Time-normalized waveforms of the different exercise modalities were compared with each other and with reference values found during walking. The results showed that training with an ERB increases both target muscle forces and HJCF. Furthermore, the ERB reduced the hip joint range of motion during the exercises. The type of ERB used (soft vs. stiff ERB) and the execution velocity of the exercise had a minor impact on the peak muscle forces and HJCF. The velocity of exercise execution, however, had an influence on the total required muscle force. Performing hip exercises without an ERB resulted in similar or lower peak HJCF and lower muscle forces than those found during walking. Adding an ERB during hip exercises increased the peak muscle and HJCF but the values remained below those found during walking. Our workflow and findings can be used in conjunction with future studies to support exercise design.


2014 ◽  
Vol 29 (6) ◽  
pp. 857-860
Author(s):  
Toshiaki SEKO ◽  
Tsuneo KUMAMOTO ◽  
Yui TAKAHASHI ◽  
Ryousuke KANEKO ◽  
Masashi TANAKA ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Justin W. Fernandez ◽  
Hyung J. Kim ◽  
Massoud Akbarshahi ◽  
Jonathan P. Walter ◽  
Benjamin J. Fregly ◽  
...  

Many studies have used musculoskeletal models to predict in vivo muscle forces at the knee during gait [1, 2]. Unfortunately, quantitative assessment of the model calculations is often impracticable. Various indirect methods have been used to evaluate the accuracy of model predictions, including comparisons against measurements of muscle activity, joint kinematics, ground reaction forces, and joint moments. In a recent study, an instrumented hip implant was used to validate calculations of hip contact forces directly [3]. The same model was subsequently used to validate model calculations of tibiofemoral loading during gait [4]. Instrumented knee implants have also been used in in vitro and in vivo studies to quantify differences in biomechanical performance between various TKR designs [5, 6]. The main aim of the present study was to evaluate model predictions of knee muscle forces by direct comparison with measurements obtained from an instrumented knee implant. Calculations of muscle and joint-contact loading were performed for level walking at slow, normal, and fast speeds.


2008 ◽  
Vol 41 (6) ◽  
pp. 1243-1252 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. Lenaerts ◽  
F. De Groote ◽  
B. Demeulenaere ◽  
M. Mulier ◽  
G. Van der Perre ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document