scholarly journals Positive Pressure Testing Booths Development and Deployment in Response to the COVID-19 Outbreak

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kevin Aroom ◽  
Jiawei Ge ◽  
Lidia Al-Zogbi ◽  
Marcee White ◽  
Adrienne Trustman ◽  
...  

Abstract The COVID-19 pandemic left an unprecedented impact on the general public health, resulting in hundreds of thousands of deaths in the US alone. Nationwide testing plans were initiated, with drive-through being the currently dominant testing approach, which, however, exhausts personal protective equipment supplies, and is unfriendly to individuals not owning a vehicle. Walk-up positive pressure testing booths are a safe alternative, whereby a health care provider situated on the inside of an enclosed and positively pressurized booth swabs a patient on the outside through chemical resistant gloves. The booths, however, are too prohibitively priced on the market to allow for nationwide deployment. To mitigate this, we present in this paper a safe, accessible, mobile and affordable design of positive-pressure COVID-19 testing booths. The booths have successfully passed the CDC and HICPAC pressure, air exchange, and air quality requirements for positive-pressure rooms, following the guidelines for environmental infection control in health care facilities. The booths are manufactured using primarily off-the-shelf components from US vendors with minimized customization, and the final bill of materials does not surpass USD 3,900. Since August 2019, five booths were deployed and used at the Johns Hopkins University School of Nursing, Baltimore City Health Department, and two community health centers in Baltimore. No health care provider was infected when using our booths, which have shown to facilitate walk-up testing with decreased PPE consumption, reduced risk of infection, and enhanced accessibility to lower-income communities and non-drivers.

Author(s):  
Shahzadi Mahmuda ◽  

Maternal health service had a potentially critical role in the improvement of reproductive health. This descriptive study was carried out in Tangail district, from 1st January to 31st December, 2019 to find out the quality of counselling of services for pregnant women in community clinics during pregnancy period. Data were collected among 289 respondents by face to face interview who had delivered within last 24 months and respondents were selected purposively. The majority (97.6%) of the respondents were housewife and maximum (72%) of the respondent were below SSC in this study monthly family income mean was taka 16124.00± 10065.480. Majority of the respondents (99.2%) had received antenatal check-up from different health care facilities and highest (87.2%) had received from the community clinic other hands (6.0%) pregnant women got antenatal care from non-government hospital among 250 respondents (94.0%) pregnant women received ANC from CHCP also (4%) pregnant women received ANC from HA. Out of 250 pregnant women (70%) of the respondents were problem suffer during pregnancy. Here majority (59.6%) pregnant women were suffer from nausea and vomiting and only (6.3%) were suffering from constipation. Majority (89.2%) of the respondents had preparation about danger sign during pregnancy. Most 245 (98%) of the respondents of pregnant women had information about ANC and most (85.7%) got information from CHCF on other hand ride got information (2.9%) from neighbour. half (4.8%) of the respondents choice of conduct delivery at upazila health complex followed by (48.8%) only choice of conduct clinics. Most (98%) of the respondents had received TT vaccine and maximum (95.1%) of the respondents had completed TT vaccine. Enough skilled manpower for patient care (98.4%). Health care provider perform ANC check-up (96.8%). Health care provider counselling during pregnancy (96.4%) physical examination (98.0%) explanation of health. (99.2%) health care provider give any advice before departure (70.4%). Continue to follow-up health status over phone (99.2%). Service providers in health care shows that 33.3% was BSc/BA, 42.9% of service providers were masters and above their professional training more than one third (38.1%) of the providers has basic training, 47.6% had basic & CSBA and rest 14.3% had ECT and nutritional training. Majority 100% of the provider’s designation had CHCP, number of staff in two health care had more than half (57.1%) providers.


2007 ◽  
Vol 177 (4S) ◽  
pp. 548-548
Author(s):  
Girish S. Kulkarni ◽  
Gina A. Lockwood ◽  
Andrew Evans ◽  
Arthy Saravanan ◽  
Michael A.S. Jewett ◽  
...  

Diabetes ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 67 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 995-P
Author(s):  
MARK PEYROT ◽  
RICHARD M. BERGENSTAL ◽  
DARLENE M. DREON ◽  
VANITA ARODA ◽  
TIMOTHY S. BAILEY ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 50 (2) ◽  
pp. xv-xvi
Author(s):  
M. Nedim Ince ◽  
David E. Elliott

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document