Proposal for Determination of Strain Rate in Environmental Fatigue Correction Evaluation

Author(s):  
Seiji Asada

To calculate an accurate environmental fatigue life correction factor (Fen) for evaluation of environmental fatigue, a detailed strain time history is needed. The strain history is determined by dividing the stress difference history with the Young’s modulus. ASME B&PV Code, Section III, NB-3216 has two methods of derivation of stress differences. One is NB-3216.1, “Constant Principal Stress Direction.” The other is NB-3216.2 “Varying Principal Stress Direction.” Determination methods for strain rates for two kinds of calculation methods of stress differences are proposed by applying the JSME Code for Environmental Fatigue Evaluation Method for Nuclear Power Plants. Also a sample calculation is performed for a typical nozzle to verify the proposed methods.

Author(s):  
Seiji Asada

A Code Case for procedure to determine strain rate and Fen for environmental fatigue evaluation is under preparation in the ASME BPV Committee on Construction of Nuclear Facility Components (III). The draft Code Case is to incorporate two methods for strain rate calculation. One is based on NB-3216.1 “Constant Principal Stress Direction” that comes from the JSME Environmental Fatigue Evaluation Method. The other is based on NB-3216.2 “Varying Principal Stress Direction” that was proposed by M. Gray et al. In this paper, both methods are explained and compared by using a sample problem.


Author(s):  
Makoto Higuchi ◽  
Takao Nakamura ◽  
Yasuaki Sugie

Many examinations concerning the fatigue life reduction for structural materials of nuclear power plants in water simulated LWR coolants had been carried out after the first paper had been recognized in Japan [1, 2]. Based on these results, the method to evaluate the fatigue damage for the materials exposed to the LWR coolant had been developed. After 1990s in Japan, the Environmental Fatigue Data Committee (EFD) of the Thermal and Nuclear Power Engineering Society (TENPES), the Project on Environmental Fatigue Testing (EFT) supported by the Japan Power Engineering and Inspection Corporation (JAPEIC) and the Japan Nuclear Energy Safety Organization (JNES) and some utility joint studies have investigated the environmental fatigue. In September 2000, the Nuclear Power Generation Safety Management Division of the Agency for Natural Resources and Energy, Ministry of International Trade and Industry issued “Guidelines for Evaluating Fatigue Initiation Life Reduction in the LWR Environment” (hereafter, called “the MITI Guidelines”) [3]. These guidelines include an equation to evaluate environmental fatigue and require electric utilities to consider the environmental effects in their Plant Life Management (PLM) activities. However, the MITI Guidelines do not provide specific and practical techniques for evaluating environmental fatigue under actual plant conditions. Accordingly, TENPES took on the task to produce one. In 2002 TENPES issued the “Guidelines on Environmental Fatigue Evaluation for LWR Component” [4, 5] (hereafter, called “the TENPES Guidelines”) based on the techniques developed by the EFD Committee. A set of Rules, called the Environmental Fatigue Evaluation Method (EFEM), was established in the Codes for Nuclear Power Generation Facilities - Environmental Fatigue Evaluation Method for Nuclear Power Plants (JSME S NF1-2006, EFEM-2006)[6], which was issued in March 2006 by reviewing the equations for the environmental fatigue life correction factor, Fen, specified in the MITI Guidelines, and the techniques for evaluating environmental fatigue specified in the TENPES Guidelines, and considering the new environmental fatigue data including JNES-SS report (August 2005) [7]. The EFEM revised version has been drafted by incorporating the updated knowledge described in JNES-SS report (April 2007) [8] and is scheduled to be issued by the end of 2009. This paper introduces the revision in it and their technical basis. Additionally, future issues are addressed to be considered in the improvement of the EFEM.


Author(s):  
Takao Nakamura ◽  
Makoto Higuchi ◽  
Takehiro Kusunoki ◽  
Yasuaki Sugie

The “Guidelines for Evaluating Fatigue Initiation Life Reduction in the LWR Environment” (the MITI Guidelines) including equations to evaluate environmental fatigue were issued and notified the electric utilities in September 2000 by the former Agency for Natural Resources and Energy in Japan. The MITI Guidelines require the Japanese utilities to take into account environmental effects when conducting fatigue evaluation associated with Plant Life Management (PLM) activities for operating nuclear power plants. However, the MITI guidelines do not specify how to conduct the environmental fatigue evaluation under actual plant conditions. To provide a concrete and practical method to deal with environmental effects on fatigue evaluation of plant equipment, Thermal and Nuclear Power Engineering Society established the “Guidelines on Environmental Fatigue Evaluation for LWR Component” (the TENPES Guidelines) in 2002. Since then, the Japan Society of Mechanical Engineers (JSME) has reviewed the equations to calculate the environmental fatigue life correction factor, Fen in the MITI guidelines and the methods to evaluate the environmental fatigue in the TENPES guidelines considering the latest environmental fatigue data. Based on the result of the review, JSME intends to establish new environmental fatigue evaluation method. This paper explains the scheme and the technical basis of the evaluation methods in JSME codes, and the positioning of the codes to apply them to actual plant conditions. Another paper is released separately that shows the background of the equation to evaluate the fatigue life under the reactor cooling water environment.[19]


2005 ◽  
Vol 93 (9-10) ◽  
Author(s):  
Dorothea Schumann ◽  
R. Grasser ◽  
R. Dressler ◽  
H. Bruchertseifer

SummaryA new device was developed for the identification of several iodine species in aqueous solution using ion chromatography. Iodide, iodate and molecular iodine can be determined. (The equipment allows both conductivity and radioactivity detections.) The method is applicable for the determination of radioactive iodine contaminations in the cooling water of nuclear power plants.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document