Discrimination of Vessel Wall Components of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms by Multi-Contrast MRI

Author(s):  
Evelyne van Dam ◽  
Marcel Rutten ◽  
Frans van de Vosse

Rupture of an abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is a major cause of death in the Western world. When the AAA is diagnosed timely, rupture can be prevented by conventional surgical or by endovascular repair. To date, the decision to operate is based on geometry alone, but it has already been suggested that wall stress would be a better predictor [2]. Patient specific computational models have been developed to calculate wall stress [2; 5; 9; 8; 10]. In these models, the AAA wall is assumed to be homogeneous. Patient-specific inhomogeneities such as atherosclerotic plaques and calcifications have large effects on the maximum wall stress and wall stress distribution [6; 7]. Histological examination is not feasible for determining wall composition of patients.

Author(s):  
Evelyne van Dam ◽  
Marcel Rutten ◽  
Frans van de Vosse

Rupture risk of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) based on wall stress analysis may be superior to the currently used diameter-based rupture risk prediction [4; 5; 6; 7]. In patient specific computational models for wall stress analysis, the geometry of the aneurysm is obtained from CT or MR images. The wall thickness and mechanical properties are mostly assumed to be homogeneous. The pathological AAA vessel wall may contain collageneous areas, but also calcifications, cholesterol crystals and large amounts of fat cells. No research has yet focused yet on the differences in mechanical properties of the components present within the degrading AAA vessel wall.


Author(s):  
Barry J. Doyle ◽  
Anthony Callanan ◽  
John Killion ◽  
Timothy M. McGloughlin

Abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) remain a significant cause of death in the Western world with over 15,000 deaths per year in the US linked to AAA rupture. Recent research [1] has questioned the use of maximum diameter as a definitive risk parameter as it is now believed that alternative factors may be important in rupture-prediction. Wall stress was shown to be a better predictor than diameter of rupture [1], with biomechanics-based rupture indices [2,3] and asymmetry also reported to have potential clinical applicability [4]. However, the majority of numerical methods used to form these alternative rupture parameters are without rigorous experimental validation, and therefore may not be as accurate as believed. Validated experiments are required in order to convince the clinical community of the worth of numerical tools such as finite element analysis (FEA) in AAA risk-prediction. Strain gauges have been used in the past to determine the strain on an AAA [5], however, the photoelastic method has also proved to be a useful tool in AAA biomechanics [6]. This paper examines the approach using three medium-sized patient-specific AAA cases at realistic pressure loadings.


2007 ◽  
Vol 40 (5) ◽  
pp. 1081-1090 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. de Putter ◽  
B.J.B.M. Wolters ◽  
M.C.M. Rutten ◽  
M. Breeuwer ◽  
F.A. Gerritsen ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 135 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
J. S. Wilson ◽  
L. Virag ◽  
P. Di Achille ◽  
I. Karšaj ◽  
J. D. Humphrey

Most computational models of abdominal aortic aneurysms address either the hemodynamics within the lesion or the mechanics of the wall. More recently, however, some models have appropriately begun to account for the evolving mechanics of the wall in response to the changing hemodynamic loads. Collectively, this large body of work has provided tremendous insight into this life-threatening condition and has provided important guidance for current research. Nevertheless, there has yet to be a comprehensive model that addresses the mechanobiology, biochemistry, and biomechanics of thrombus-laden abdominal aortic aneurysms. That is, there is a pressing need to include effects of the hemodynamics on both the development of the nearly ubiquitous intraluminal thrombus and the evolving mechanics of the wall, which depends in part on biochemical effects of the adjacent thrombus. Indeed, there is increasing evidence that intraluminal thrombus in abdominal aortic aneurysms is biologically active and should not be treated as homogeneous inert material. In this review paper, we bring together diverse findings from the literature to encourage next generation models that account for the biochemomechanics of growth and remodeling in patient-specific, thrombus-laden abdominal aortic aneurysms.


Author(s):  
Barry Doyle ◽  
Jennifer Richards ◽  
Scott Semple ◽  
Tom MacGillivray ◽  
Calum Gray ◽  
...  

Abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) remain a significant cause of death in the Western world with over 15,000 deaths per year in the US linked to AAA rupture. There is a general belief among the clinical and engineering community that improved methods of risk prediction are needed. The growth and expansion of AAAs over time is thought to be associated with the mechanobiological interactions within the diseased AAA wall. The stresses and strains induced in the wall by the internal blood pressure trigger increased protease activity and turnover of the extracellular matrix (ECM), thus enabling degradation and expansion of the wall. Inflammatory cells also control collagen synthesis and inflammation can reduce the tensile strength of the wall, thus contributing to the likelihood of rupture. Recently, important work by Richards et al. [1] showed that AAAs with specific sites of focal inflammation have threefold higher growth rates than AAAs with non-specific inflammation.


2016 ◽  
Vol 52 (5) ◽  
pp. 635-642 ◽  
Author(s):  
E.M.J. van Disseldorp ◽  
N.J. Petterson ◽  
M.C.M. Rutten ◽  
F.N. van de Vosse ◽  
M.R.H.M. van Sambeek ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 9 (74) ◽  
pp. 2047-2058 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. S. Wilson ◽  
S. Baek ◽  
J. D. Humphrey

Complementary advances in medical imaging, vascular biology and biomechanics promise to enable computational modelling of abdominal aortic aneurysms to play increasingly important roles in clinical decision processes. Using a finite-element-based growth and remodelling model of evolving aneurysm geometry and material properties, we show that regional variations in material anisotropy, stiffness and wall thickness should be expected to arise naturally and thus should be included in analyses of aneurysmal enlargement or wall stress. In addition, by initiating the model from best-fit material parameters estimated for non-aneurysmal aortas from different subjects, we show that the initial state of the aorta may influence strongly the subsequent rate of enlargement, wall thickness, mechanical behaviour and thus stress in the lesion. We submit, therefore, that clinically reliable modelling of the enlargement and overall rupture-potential of aneurysms may require both a better understanding of the mechanobiological processes that govern the evolution of these lesions and new methods of determining the patient-specific state of the pre-aneurysmal aorta (or correlation to currently unaffected portions thereof) through knowledge of demographics, comorbidities, lifestyle, genetics and future non-invasive or minimally invasive tests.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document