Ultrasound-guided caudal epidural injection in three simple steps

Objective: To assess the short-term efficacy of ultrasound-guided caudal epidural steroid injections (ESIs) in improving pain, and nerve function as measured by electrophysiological testing in chronic radicular low back pain. Methods: Patients diagnosed with chronic radicular low back pain were randomized into one of two groups. The injection group (n = 20) underwent a single ultrasound-guided Caudal ESI of 1 ml of 40 mg ml−1 Triamcinolone Acetonide (Kenacort-A), with local anesthetic. The control group (n = 20) underwent a 12-session physiotherapy program. Both groups were evaluated before and 2 weeks after the intervention using visual analog scale for pain and electrophysiological testing comprising peroneal and tibial terminal motor latencies and F-response latencies and chronodispersion. Results: Both groups showed significant pain reduction on the visual analog scale after the intervention. The injection group showed a significant reduction in F wave chronodispersion post-treatment (<0.01). In the control group, there were no significant differences in F wave parameters pre- and post-treatment (p > 0.05). Conclusion: Caudal ESIs were shown to provide short-term improvement of nerve function as evident by improvement in the electrophysiological parameters sensitive to radiculopathy. It was found to be superior to standard physical therapy in this regard. Advances in knowledge: This work shows a novel electrophysiologic evidence of the short-term efficacy ultrasound-guided caudal ESI.

Download Full-text

Caudal epidural injection of a combination of ketamine and xylazine for perineal analgesia in horses

Veterinary Anaesthesia and Analgesia ◽

10.1046/j.1467-2995.2000.00018-4.x ◽

2000 ◽

Vol 27 (2) ◽

pp. 115 ◽

Cited By ~ 6

Author(s):

A Kariman ◽

I Nowrouzian ◽

J Bakhtiari

Keyword(s):

Epidural Injection ◽

Caudal Epidural

Download Full-text

Proposed Ionizing Radiation Doses of 3711 Fluoroscopy-Guided Epidural Injections

10.22541/au.161545792.21587393/v1 ◽

2021 ◽

Author(s):

Rekib Sacaklidir ◽

Ekim Can Ozturk ◽

Savas Sencan ◽

Osman Hakan Gunduz

Keyword(s):

Ionizing Radiation ◽

Imaging Techniques ◽

Epidural Injection ◽

Critical Issue ◽

University Hospital ◽

Epidural Injections ◽

Epidural Steroid Injections ◽

Dose Levels ◽

Interlaminar Epidural Injection ◽

Caudal Epidural

Background: Since fluoroscopy-guided interventional therapies grew significantly in recent years, exposure to ionizing radiation (IR) either for patient or medical staff became a critical issue. IR exposure varies according to the physicians’ experience, patients’ body mass index (BMI), imaging techniques and type of the procedure performed. The purpose of this study is to calculate the reference IR doses for fluoroscopy-guided epidural injections per procedure and BMI to provide reference doses for potential use in future dose reduction strategies. Methods: A retrospectively, evaluation of patients who received epidural steroid injections between January 2015 and December 2020 in a university hospital interventional pain management center, was performed. This observational study was conducted with patients aged  18 who underwent 3711 epidural injections including cervical interlaminar, lumbar interlaminar, lumbar transforaminal and caudal approaches. Provided IR doses for each patient were also divided by patients’ BMI to obtain dose per BMI. Results: The highest IR dose per procedure was found in caudal epidural injection with 0.218 mGy m2 and lowest dose was in cervical interlaminar epidural injection with 0.057 mGy m2. The IR dose per procedure was 0.123 mGy m2 for lumbar transforaminal and 0.191 mGy m2 for lumbar interlaminar epidural injection. Caudal epidural injection had also the highest IR dose per BMI which was 0.00749 and cervical interlaminar epidural injection had the lowest radiation dose per BMI which was 0.00214. Conclusions: We proposed reference IR dose levels of four approaches of epidural injections obtained from 3711 injections performed in a university hospital pain medicine clinic. BMI of patients were taken into account with the dose levels of injections given per BMI. Multicenter research with standardized techniques will assure more reliable reference levels which will guide pain physicians to self-assess their own levels of radiation exposure.

Download Full-text