Weak edge enhancement based on contextual modulation of non-classical receptive field

2015 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jie Xiao ◽  
Chao Cai
Keyword(s):  
Receptive Field ◽  
Edge Enhancement ◽  
Contextual Modulation ◽  
Classical Receptive Field ◽  
Weak Edge

Surrounding Suppression and Facilitation in the Determination of Border Ownership

2006 ◽  
Vol 18 (4) ◽  
pp. 562-579 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ko Sakai ◽  
Haruka Nishimura
Keyword(s):  
Receptive Field ◽  
Population Study ◽  
Stimulus Size ◽  
Significant Suppression ◽  
Neuronal Responses ◽  
Contextual Modulation ◽  
Classical Receptive Field ◽  
Visual Areas ◽  
High Consistency

Contextual modulation reported in early- to intermediate-level visual areas could be an essential component to signal border ownership (BO) that specifies the direction of figure along a contour. The surrounding regions that evoke significant suppression or facilitation are highly localized and asymmetric with respect to the center of the classical receptive field (CRF). We propose a hypothesis that such surrounding modulation is a basis for BO-selectivity. Although this idea has been discussed for several years, it is uncertain how many of a vast variety of surrounding organizations could signal correctly the direction of ownership, and how many could signal consistently for various stimuli. We carried out computationally a population study of the surrounding effects to investigate how many cells exhibit effective and consistent BO signals. We tested hundreds of various organizations, and found that most of the asymmetric, iso-orientation suppressive regions, regardless of position or size, lead to surprisingly high consistency in the direction of ownership for various stimuli. The combinations of iso-orientation suppression and cross-orientation facilitation indicate both high robustness and consistency in the ownership determination. We constructed a model for BO-selective neurons based on the surrounding effects, and investigated whether the model reproduces major characteristics of the neuronal responses, including a variety in the BO selectivity among neurons, consistency with respect to various stimuli, invariance to stimulus size, and co-selectivity to BO and contrast. The model reproduced successfully the major characteristics of BO-selective neurons.

scholarly journals Contextual modulation of sensitivity to naturalistic image structure in macaque V2

2018 ◽  
Vol 120 (2) ◽  
pp. 409-420 ◽  
Author(s):  
Corey M. Ziemba ◽  
Jeremy Freeman ◽  
Eero P. Simoncelli ◽  
J. Anthony Movshon
Keyword(s):  
Visual Field ◽  
Receptive Field ◽  
Time Course ◽  
Visual Input ◽  
Contextual Modulation ◽  
Image Structure ◽  
V1 Neurons ◽  
Enhanced Sensitivity ◽  
Area V2 ◽  
Classical Receptive Field

The stimulus selectivity of neurons in V1 is well known, as is the finding that their responses can be affected by visual input to areas outside of the classical receptive field. Less well understood are the ways selectivity is modified as signals propagate to visual areas beyond V1, such as V2. We recently proposed a role for V2 neurons in representing the higher order statistical dependencies found in images of naturally occurring visual texture. V2 neurons, but not V1 neurons, respond more vigorously to “naturalistic” images that contain these dependencies than to “noise” images that lack them. In this work, we examine the dependency of these effects on stimulus size. For most V2 neurons, the preference for naturalistic over noise stimuli was modest when presented in small patches and gradually strengthened with increasing size, suggesting that the mechanisms responsible for this enhanced sensitivity operate over regions of the visual field that are larger than the classical receptive field. Indeed, we found that surround suppression was stronger for noise than for naturalistic stimuli and that the preference for large naturalistic stimuli developed over a delayed time course consistent with lateral or feedback connections. These findings are compatible with a spatially broad facilitatory mechanism that is absent in V1 and suggest that a distinct role for the receptive field surround emerges in V2 along with sensitivity for more complex image structure. NEW & NOTEWORTHY The responses of neurons in visual cortex are often affected by visual input delivered to regions of the visual field outside of the conventionally defined receptive field, but the significance of such contextual modulations are not well understood outside of area V1. We studied the importance of regions beyond the receptive field in establishing a novel form of selectivity for the statistical dependencies contained in natural visual textures that first emerges in area V2.

scholarly journals Beyond the classical receptive field: The effect of contextual stimuli

2015 ◽  
Vol 15 (9) ◽  
pp. 7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lothar Spillmann ◽  
Birgitta Dresp-Langley ◽  
Chia-huei Tseng
Keyword(s):  
Receptive Field ◽  
Classical Receptive Field ◽  
Contextual Stimuli

Dynamic Properties of Recurrent Inhibition in Primary Visual Cortex: Contrast and Orientation Dependence of Contextual Effects

2000 ◽  
Vol 83 (2) ◽  
pp. 1019-1030 ◽  
Author(s):  
Valentin Dragoi ◽  
Mriganka Sur
Keyword(s):  
Visual Cortex ◽  
Receptive Field ◽  
Primary Visual Cortex ◽  
Dynamic Properties ◽  
Orientation Dependence ◽  
Recurrent Inhibition ◽  
Inhibitory Neurons ◽  
Classical Receptive Field ◽  
Contextual Interactions ◽  
Receptive Field Center

A fundamental feature of neural circuitry in the primary visual cortex (V1) is the existence of recurrent excitatory connections between spiny neurons, recurrent inhibitory connections between smooth neurons, and local connections between excitatory and inhibitory neurons. We modeled the dynamic behavior of intermixed excitatory and inhibitory populations of cells in V1 that receive input from the classical receptive field (the receptive field center) through feedforward thalamocortical afferents, as well as input from outside the classical receptive field (the receptive field surround) via long-range intracortical connections. A counterintuitive result is that the response of oriented cells can be facilitated beyond optimal levels when the surround stimulus is cross-oriented with respect to the center and suppressed when the surround stimulus is iso-oriented. This effect is primarily due to changes in recurrent inhibition within a local circuit. Cross-oriented surround stimulation leads to a reduction of presynaptic inhibition and a supraoptimal response, whereas iso-oriented surround stimulation has the opposite effect. This mechanism is used to explain the orientation and contrast dependence of contextual interactions in primary visual cortex: responses to a center stimulus can be both strongly suppressed and supraoptimally facilitated as a function of surround orientation, and these effects diminish as stimulus contrast decreases.

scholarly journals Attention operates uniformly throughout the classical receptive field and the surround

eLife ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 5 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bram-Ernst Verhoef ◽  
John HR Maunsell
Keyword(s):  
Receptive Field ◽  
Cortical Neurons ◽  
Receptive Fields ◽  
Spatial Summation ◽  
Field Structure ◽  
Neuronal Responses ◽  
Large Variability ◽  
Area V4 ◽  
Classical Receptive Field ◽  
Spatially Varying

Shifting attention among visual stimuli at different locations modulates neuronal responses in heterogeneous ways, depending on where those stimuli lie within the receptive fields of neurons. Yet how attention interacts with the receptive-field structure of cortical neurons remains unclear. We measured neuronal responses in area V4 while monkeys shifted their attention among stimuli placed in different locations within and around neuronal receptive fields. We found that attention interacts uniformly with the spatially-varying excitation and suppression associated with the receptive field. This interaction explained the large variability in attention modulation across neurons, and a non-additive relationship among stimulus selectivity, stimulus-induced suppression and attention modulation that has not been previously described. A spatially-tuned normalization model precisely accounted for all observed attention modulations and for the spatial summation properties of neurons. These results provide a unified account of spatial summation and attention-related modulation across both the classical receptive field and the surround.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document