The application of machine learning (ML) to problems in homogeneous catalysis has
emerged as a promising avenue for catalyst optimization. An important aspect of such optimization
campaigns is determining which reactions to run at the outset of experimentation and which future
predictions are the most reliable. Herein, we explore methods for these two tasks in the context of
our previously developed chemoinformatics workflow. First, different methods for training set
selection are compared, including algorithmic selection and selection informed by unsupervised
learning methods. Next, an array of different metrics for assessment of prediction confidence are
examined in multiple catalyst manifolds. These approaches will inform future computer-guided
studies to accelerate catalyst selection and reaction optimization. Finally, this work demonstrates
the generality of the Average Steric Occupancy (ASO) and Average Electronic Indicator Field
(AEIF) descriptors in their application to transition metal catalysts for the first time. <br>
Deep-learned faces of pain and emotions: Elucidating the differences of facial expressions with the help of explainable AI methods
