scholarly journals Visualized information value model result of landslide vulnerability in Purworejo

Author(s):  
Sudaryatno Sudaryatno ◽  
Prima Widayani ◽  
Totok Wahyu Wibowo ◽  
Bayu Aji Sidiq Pramono ◽  
Zulfa Nur'aini 'Afifah ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (11) ◽  
pp. 44-56
Author(s):  
Abhijit S. Patil ◽  
Bidyut K. Bhadra ◽  
Sachin S. Panhalkar ◽  
Sudhir K. Powar

Almost every year, the Himalayan region suffers from a landslide disaster that is directly associated with the prosperity and development of the area. The study of landslide disasters helps planners, decision-makers and local communities for the development of anthropogenic structures in order to enhance the safety of society. Therefore, the prime aim of this research is to produce the landslide susceptibility map for the Chenab river valley using the bi-variate statistical information value model to detect and demarcate the areas of potential landslide incidence. The object-based image analysis method identified about 84 potential sites of landslides as landslide inventory. The statistical information value model is derived from the landslide inventory and multiple causative factors. The outcome showed that 23% area of the Chenab river valley falls into the class of a very high landslide susceptibility zone. The ROC curve method is used to validate the model which denoted the acceptable result for the landslide susceptibility zonation with 0.826 AUC value for the Chenab river valley.


2009 ◽  
Vol 40 (1) ◽  
pp. 113-132
Author(s):  
Seung-Hoon Yoo ◽  
Jae-Yong Heo ◽  
Yoon-Gih Ahn

2013 ◽  
Vol 734-737 ◽  
pp. 3163-3170
Author(s):  
Yu Feng Chen ◽  
Xue Lian Cao

Information value model simplify the total information of evaluation unit down to sum of each factor, what may influence the prediction accuracy when factors are strongly correlated . Thus, its better to select the original modelthe multi-factor combined information value model, which directly calculate the information of factors-combination. However, the calculation is hard to realize due to the large number of combinations. In this paper, we propose a method that can quickly calculate the information. Taking Badong area for example, selecting slope, aspect, lithology, distance to drainage system and distance to road as influence factors, constructed the ideal information value model and the multi-factor combined information value model respectively. We found that the former model accuracy is 71.1%, with the latter is 80.3%. The result proved that the correlation between factors may have great influence, and showed the multi-factor combined information value model is better in a way.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Filagot Mengistu Walle ◽  
Karuturi Venkata Suryabhagavan ◽  
Tarun Raghuvanshi ◽  
Elias Lewi

<p>Landslide hazard is becoming serious environmental constraints for the developmental activities in the highlands of Ethiopia. With the current infrastructure development, urbanization, rural development, and with the present landslide management system, it is predictable that the frequency and magnitude of landslide and losses due to such hazards would continue to increase. In the present study landslide hazard zone mapping were carried out in and around Gidole Town in Southern Ethiopia. The main objective of the study was to map landslide hazard zone using Information Value Bi-variant statistical model.  For landslide hazard zonation of the study area six causative factors namely; aspect, slope angle, elevation, Lithology, Normalized Deference Vegetation Index (NDVI) and land-use and land-cover were considered. The landslide inventory mapping for the present study area was carried out through field observations and Google Earth image interpretation. Later, Information value was calculated based on the influence of causative factors on past landslide. The distribution of landslide over each causative factor maps was obtained and analyzed. Weights for the class with in these causative factor maps was obtained using information value model. Distribution of landslide in the study area was largely governed by aspect of southwest facing, slope angel of 30-45<sup>o</sup>, elevation of 1815–2150m, NDVI of 0.27−0.37, Lithology of colluvial deposit and land-use and land-cover of agricultural land. The landslide hazard zonation map shows that 78.38km<sup>2</sup> (36.3%) area fall within very low hazard (VLH) zone, 72.85km<sup>2</sup> (34.2%) of the area fall within low hazard (LH) zone, 12.78 km<sup>2</sup> (6.6%), 32.72 km<sup>2</sup> (15.4%) and 15.89 km<sup>2</sup> (7.5%) of the area falls into very high hazard (VHH), high hazard (HH) and moderate hazard (MH), respectively. Further, validation of LHZ map with past landslide inventory data shows that 92.3% of the existing landslides fall in very high hazard (VHH) and high hazard (VHH) zone. Thus, it can safely be concluded that the hazard zones delineated in the present study validates with the past landslide data and the potential zone depicted can reasonably be applied for the safe planning of the area.</p><p><strong>Key words</strong>: Landslide, Gidole, Landslide hazard zone, Information Value model</p>


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document