Wide field, phase measuring confocal microscopy of small particles

2003 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. B. E. Sawyer ◽  
Stephen P. Morgan ◽  
Michael G. Somekh ◽  
Chung Wah See ◽  
B. Y. Shekunov ◽  
...  
2003 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephen P. Morgan ◽  
N. B. E. Sawyer ◽  
Michael G. Somekh ◽  
Chung Wah See ◽  
B. Y. Shekunov ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
David L. Dickensheets ◽  
Seth Kreitinger ◽  
Gary Peterson ◽  
Michael Heger ◽  
Milind Rajadhyaksha

2000 ◽  
Vol 1 (4) ◽  
pp. 291-298 ◽  
Author(s):  
W.G.J.H.M. van Sark ◽  
P.L.T.M. Frederix ◽  
D.J. van den Heuvel ◽  
M.A.H. Asselbergs ◽  
I. Senf ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 18 (3) ◽  
pp. 483-492 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martine Chebrout ◽  
Pierre-Gaël Adenot ◽  
Karine Reynaud ◽  
Sylvie Chastant-Maillard

AbstractDue to the marked cytoplasmic opacity of canine oocytes, the diagnosis of their nuclear status is difficult. The objective of the present study was to evaluate the accuracy of Hoechst staining observed under epifluorescence wide-field microscopy [living oocyte observation (LivOO)] by comparison to a reference technique [DNA staining with ethidium homodimer-2 under confocal microscopy; fixed oocyte observation (FixOO)]. Four Hoechst 33342 concentrations (200 ng, 500 ng, 1 μg, 2 μg/mL) were tested and 1 μg/mL was the lowest one with the lowest proportion of oocytes in which DNA was missed. At this concentration, LivOO procedure did not affect the degeneration rate. On 379 oocytes observed individually with the two techniques successively, diagnosis of meiosis resumption by LivOO was exact in 87.3% of the cases, but the meiosis resumption rate was underestimated (23.5% versus 34.3% with FixOO; p < 0.001). Diagnosis for metaphase II was exact in 80% of the cases, but LivOO detected only 72.7% of the metaphase II oocytes present. Metaphase rates did not differ between LivOO and FixOO. This study contributes to a better interpretation of in vitro maturation results. The developmental potential of metaphase II canine oocytes sorted after Hoechst staining is to be evaluated.


1999 ◽  
Vol 5 (S2) ◽  
pp. 470-471
Author(s):  
Pier A. Benedetti ◽  
Valter Evangelista ◽  
Dante Guidarini ◽  
Stefano Vestri

State of the art in optical microscopyOptical microscopy is still and increasingly one of the most valuable tools in biological investigation. In particular, confocal microscopies are capable of achieving best performances in the study of three-dimensional fluorescent and reflecting specimens. Nevertheless, current techniques adopted in confocal microscopy present some drawbacks and limitations that stimulate to devise and set-up further techniques, suited to a wider range of applications.Advantages of confocal microscopes mainly correspond to an improved spatial resolution, especially in the axial direction. Depending on the narrow-field scanning approach used, there are two main forms of confocal microscopes: single-point (SP) and multi-point (MP) ones. Unfortunately, SP confocal microscopes require the use of lasers as illumination sources with consequent high costs and scarce spectral flexibility. Moreover, specimen photo-damage due to relatively high instantaneous irradiation doses involved, can often limit their investigative capabilities. On the other hand, proposed MP confocal microscopes still rely on the revolving-disk approach and exhibit a relatively low luminous efficiency, substantial constructional complexity, and limited contrast in the study of thick fluorescent objects.


Author(s):  
Catherine R. M. Fitzpatrick ◽  
George S. D. Gordon ◽  
Travis W. Sawyer ◽  
Sarah E. Bohndiek ◽  
Timothy D. Wilkinson

Author(s):  
Peter Shaw ◽  
Alison Beven ◽  
David Rawlins ◽  
Martin Highett

Fluorescent in situ hybridization and 3-D confocal microscopy have been used to study the arrangement of genes and transcripts in interphase plant nuclei. Wide-field fluorescence microscopy coupled with computer deconvolution has also been used on the same specimens and gives comparable results to confocal imaging. When image deconvolution is applied to confocal images, these show a significant improvement. A comparison of confocal and wide-field (CCD) images of the same specimen (a plant nucleolus labelled with probe to the rRNA genes) is shown in Figure 1. The deconvoluted wide-field data (Fig 1b) and the raw confocal data (Fig 1c) are remarkably similar; the former is somewhat clearer. The deconvoluted confocal data (Fig 1d) is clearest of all.Double-stranded DNA and single-stranded RNA probes to the 45S and 5S RNA genes have been used to investigate the functional organization of the nucleolus in pea root tissue. In situ hybridization was carried out on vibratome slices approximately 50μm thick (about 3 cells).


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document