Single and dual energy attenuation correction in PET/CT in the presence of iodine based contrast agents

2008 ◽  
Vol 35 (5) ◽  
pp. 1959-1969 ◽  
Author(s):  
Niklas S. Rehfeld ◽  
Björn J. Heismann ◽  
Jürgen Kupferschläger ◽  
Philip Aschoff ◽  
Gunter Christ ◽  
...  
2013 ◽  
Vol 41 (1) ◽  
pp. 012501 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ting Xia ◽  
Adam M. Alessio ◽  
Paul E. Kinahan

2006 ◽  
Vol 33 (4) ◽  
pp. 976-983 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonathan P. J. Carney ◽  
David W. Townsend ◽  
Vitaliy Rappoport ◽  
Bernard Bendriem

2014 ◽  
Vol 35 (5) ◽  
pp. 472-477 ◽  
Author(s):  
Edwin E.G.W. ter Voert ◽  
Hanneke W.M. van Laarhoven ◽  
Peter J.M. Kok ◽  
Wim J.G. Oyen ◽  
Eric P. Visser ◽  
...  

2007 ◽  
Vol 34 (6Part1) ◽  
pp. 2039-2047 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pai-Chun Melinda Chi ◽  
Osama Mawlawi ◽  
Sadek A. Nehmeh ◽  
Yusuf E. Erdi ◽  
Peter A. Balter ◽  
...  

1993 ◽  
Vol 40 (4) ◽  
pp. 1242-1252 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bruce H. Hasegawa ◽  
Thomas F. Lang ◽  
J. Keenan Brown ◽  
Eric L. Gingold ◽  
Susan M. Reilly ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 48 (1) ◽  
pp. 17-20 ◽  
Author(s):  
Agnes Araujo Valadares ◽  
Paulo Schiavom Duarte ◽  
Eduardo Bechtloff Woellner ◽  
George Barberio Coura-Filho ◽  
Marcelo Tatit Sapienza ◽  
...  

Objective: To analyze standardized uptake values (SUVs) using three different tube current intensities for attenuation correction on 18FNaF PET/CT scans. Materials and Methods: A total of 254 18F-NaF PET/CT studies were analyzed using 10, 20 and 30 mAs. The SUVs were calculated in volumes of interest (VOIs) drawn on three skeletal regions, namely, right proximal humeral diaphysis (RH), right proximal femoral diaphysis (RF), and first lumbar vertebra (LV1) in a total of 712 VOIs. The analyses covered 675 regions classified as normal (236 RH, 232 RF, and 207 LV1). Results: Mean SUV for each skeletal region was 3.8, 5.4 and 14.4 for RH, RF, and LV1, respectively. As the studies were grouped according to mAs value, the mean SUV values were 3.8, 3.9 and 3.7 for 10, 20 and 30 mAs, respectively, in the RH region; 5.4, 5.5 and 5.4 for 10, 20 and 30 mAs, respectively, in the RF region; 13.8, 14.9 and 14.5 for 10, 20 and 30 mAs, respectively, in the LV1 region. Conclusion: The three tube current values yielded similar results for SUV calculation.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document