TH-C-217A-01: Image Wisely: Radiation Safety in Adult Medical Imaging

2012 ◽  
Vol 39 (6Part30) ◽  
pp. 4005-4005
2018 ◽  
Vol 5 ◽  
pp. 238212051879881 ◽  
Author(s):  
Diane Armao ◽  
Terry S Hartman ◽  
Christopher M Shea ◽  
Laurence Katz ◽  
Tracey Thurnes ◽  
...  

“I am not young enough to know everything.” Oscar Wilde Background: There is insufficient knowledge among providers and patients/caregivers of ionizing radiation exposure from medical imaging examinations. This study used a brief, interactive educational intervention targeting the topics of best imaging practices and radiation safety early in health professions students’ training. The authors hypothesized that public health, medical, and physician assistant students who receive early education for imaging appropriateness and radiation safety will undergo a change in attitude and have increased awareness and knowledge of these topics. Materials and methods: The authors conducted a 1.5-hour interactive educational intervention focusing on medical imaging utilization and radiation safety. Students were presented with a pre/postquestionnaire and data were analyzed using t tests and multivariate analysis of variance. Results: A total of 301 students were enrolled in the study. There was 58% ( P < .01) and 85% ( P < .01) improvement in attitude and knowledge regarding appropriateness of imaging, respectively. The authors also found an 8% increase ( P < .01) in students who thought informed consent should be obtained prior to pediatric computed tomographic imaging. Physical assistant students were more likely than medical students to prefer obtaining informed consent at baseline ( P = .03). Conclusions: A brief educational session provided to health professions students early in their education showed an increased awareness and knowledge of the utility, limitations, and risks associated with medical imaging. Incorporation of a best imagining practice educational session early during medical education may promote more thoughtful imaging decisions for future medical providers.


2021 ◽  
pp. 20210406
Author(s):  
Jarrel Seah ◽  
Zoe Brady ◽  
Kyle Ewert ◽  
Meng Law

Artificial Intelligence (AI), including deep learning, is currently revolutionising the field of medical imaging, with far reaching implications for almost every facet of diagnostic imaging, including patient radiation safety. This paper introduces basic concepts in deep learning and provides an overview of its recent history and its application in tomographic reconstruction as well as other applications in medical imaging to reduce patient radiation dose, as well as a brief description of previous tomographic reconstruction techniques. This review also describes the commonly used deep learning techniques as applied to tomographic reconstruction and draws parallels to current reconstruction techniques. Finally, this paper reviews some of the estimated dose reductions in computed tomography (CT) and positron emission tomography (PET) in the recent literature enabled by deep learning, as well as some of the potential problems that may be encountered such as the obscuration of pathology, and highlights the need for additional clinical reader studies from the imaging community.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hasna Albander

Medical imaging is the identification or study procedure for obtaining medical images of body parts. Millions of imaging procedures take place worldwide each week. Radiation protection is intended to prevent the ionizing radiation exposure from having harmful effects. Exposure may result from a source of radiation outside the human body, or from ingestion of radioactive pollution from internal irradiation. This chapter presents Occupational Health and Radiation Safety of Radiography workers in the medical imaging field. This chapter also summarizes how current employment health status and knowledge gaps can be illustrated in some key and critical occupational issues as well as diseases such as radiation, nosocomial and occupational infections.


Radiographics ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 32 (6) ◽  
pp. 1829-1837 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. Rob Goodman ◽  
Maxwell Amurao

2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (3) ◽  
pp. 10-19
Author(s):  
Thorarin A. Bjarnason ◽  
Robert Rees ◽  
Judy Kainz ◽  
Lawrence H. Le ◽  
Errol E. Stewart ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 2011 ◽  
pp. 1-5 ◽  
Author(s):  
David E. Fish ◽  
Andrew Kim ◽  
Christopher Ornelas ◽  
Sungchan Song ◽  
Sanjog Pangarkar

It is widely accepted that the use of medical imaging continues to grow across the globe as does the concern for radiation safety. The danger of lens opacities and cataract formation related to radiation exposure is well documented in the medical literature. However, there continues to be controversy regarding actual dose thresholds of radiation exposure and whether these thresholds are still relevant to cataract formation. Eye safety and the risk involved for the interventional pain physician is not entirely clear. Given the available literature on measured radiation exposure to the interventionist, and the controversy regarding dose thresholds, it is our current recommendation that the interventional pain physician use shielded eyewear. As the breadth of interventional procedures continues to grow, so does the radiation risk to the interventional pain physician. In this paper, we attempt to outline the risk of cataract formation in the scope of practice of an interventional pain physician and describe techniques that may help reduce them.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document