Delta Tocotrienol as a Supplement to FOLFOXIRI in First Line Treatment of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer. A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Phase II Study

Purpose Triplet chemotherapy might be more effective than doublet chemotherapy in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), but it may also be marked by increased toxicity. To investigate whether δ-tocotrienol, a vitamin E analogue, with its possible neuroprotective and anti-inflammatory effects reduces the toxicity of triplet chemotherapy, we conducted a randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled trial in mCRC patients receiving first line 5-fluorouracil, oxaliplatin and irinotecan (FOLFOXIRI).Methods We randomly assigned 70 mCRC patients to FOLFOXIRI plus δ-tocotrienol or FOLFOXIRI plus placebo. FOLFOXIRI was given in eight cycles followed by four cycles of 5-fluorouracil. δ-tocotrienol 300 mg or placebo x 3 daily was added during chemotherapy and for a maximum of two years. The primary endpoint was time to hospitalization or death during treatment with chemotherapy.Results Median time to first hospitalization or death was 3.7 months in the placebo group (95% CI 1.93-not reached (NR)), and NR in the δ-tocotrienol group (95% CI 1.87-NR) with a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.70 (95% CI 0.36-1.36, p=0.29)). In the placebo group 24 patients (71%) had oxaliplatin dose reductions compared to 17 patients (47%) in the δ-tocotrienol group (p=0.047).Conclusion The addition of δ-tocotrienol to FOLFOXIRI did not significantly prolong the time to first hospitalization or death compared to FOLFOXIRI plus placebo. Toxicity was manageable and not statistically different between the two groups. There was a statistically significant difference in dose reductions of oxaliplatin pointing to a possible neuroprotective effect of δ-tocotrienol.Clinicaltrials.gov identifier NCT02705300. Date of registration March 10, 2016.

Predictors of successful discontinuation of antipsychotics and antidepressants

Background To offer support for patients who decide to discontinue antipsychotic and antidepressant medication, identifying which potentially modifiable factors correlate with discontinuation success is crucial. Here, we analyzed the predictive value of the professional support received, circumstances prior to discontinuation, a strategy of discontinuation, and use of functional and non-functional coping strategies during discontinuation on self-reported discontinuation success and on objective discontinuation. Methods Patients who had attempted discontinuing antipsychotics (AP) and/or antidepressants (AD) during the past 5 years (n = 316) completed an online survey including questions on subjective and objective discontinuation success, sociodemographic, clinical and medication-related factors, and scales to assess the putative predictors. Results A regression model with all significant predictors explained 20–30% of the variance in discontinuation success for AD and 30–40% for AP. After controlling for baseline sociodemographic, clinical and medication-related factors, the most consistent predictor of subjective discontinuation success was self-care behavior, in particular mindfulness, relaxation and making use of supportive relationships. Other predictors depended on the type of medication: For AD, good alliance with the prescribing physician predicted higher subjective success whereas gradual tapering per se was associated with lower subjective success and a lower chance of full discontinuation. In those tapering off AP, leaving time to adjust between dose reductions was associated with higher subjective success and fewer negative effects. Conclusions The findings can inform evidence-based clinical guidelines and interventions aiming to support patients during discontinuation. Further studies powered to take interactions between variables into account are needed to improve the prediction of successful discontinuation.

Losartan improves intestinal mucositis induced by 5-fluorouracil in mice

Intestinal mucositis (IM) is a common side effect of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)-based chemotherapy, which negatively impacts therapeutic outcomes and delays subsequent cycles of chemotherapy resulting in dose reductions and treatment discontinuation. In search of new pharmacological alternatives that minimize your symptoms, this work set out to study the effect of losartan (LOS), a receptor type I (AT1) angiotensin II antagonist, on intestinal mucositis induced by 5-FU. Intestinal mucositis was induced by a single intraperitoneal administration of 5-FU (450 mg/kg) in Swiss mice. Losartan (5, 25 or 50 mg/kg) or saline was orally administered 30 min before 5-FU and daily for 4 days. On 4th day, the animals were euthanized and segments of small intestine were collected to evaluate histopathological alterations (morphometric analysis), concentration of inflammatory cytokines, oxidative stress markers and genic expression of NF-κB p65, Fn-14 and TWEAK. Weight evaluation and changes in leukogram were also analyzed. 5-FU induced intense weight loss, leukopenia and reduction in villus height compared to saline group. Losartan (50 mg/kg) prevented 5-FU-induced inflammation by decreasing in the analyzed parameters compared to the 5-FU group. Our findings suggest that 50 mg/kg of losartan prevents the effects of 5-FU on intestinal mucosa in mice.

Feasibility of High-dose Methotrexate Administered on Day 1 of (R)CHOP in aggressive non-Hodgkin Lymphomas

The optimal timing for administering high-dose methotrexate (HDMTX) when combined with (R)CHOP (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, prednisone, with/without rituximab) is unclear. Recent data showed that the administration of prophylactic HDMTX before day 10 of R-CHOP may lead to fewer treatment delays. Herein, we report our experience with HDMTX administered on day 1 of (R)CHOP in patients with aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma. We identified 140 patients treated with ≥1 cycle of HDMTX combined with (R)CHOP for prophylaxis against (n=84) or treatment of (n=56) central nervous system involvement. Overall, (R)CHOP treatment delays ≥7 days (4% of cycles, 13% of patients), doxorubicin and/or cyclophosphamide dose reductions (1% of cycles, 6% of patients) or (R)CHOP discontinuations due to toxicity (4% of patients) were uncommon. Neutropenic fever (NF) occurred in 7% of cycles and 24% of patients and was more common during HDMTX-containing cycles. Acute kidney injury (AKI) occurred in 19% of cycles but was mostly grade ≤2. Grade ≥3 hepatotoxicity and mucositis were uncommon (each 2% of cycles). In the prophylaxis cohort, the rates of NF and grade ≥2 AKI were lower in patients who initiated HDMTX with cycle 2 or later (11% vs 30%, p=0.03 and 16% vs 39%, p=0.03, respectively). Our data show that HDMTX administration on day 1 of (R)CHOP may improve the deliverability of (R)CHOP and the overall safety of the regimen compared with historical data of HDMTX administration on day 10 or later of R-CHOP. Delaying prophylactic HDMTX beyond cycle 1 of (R)CHOP may reduce the risk of NF and AKI.

Real-world ibrutinib dose reductions, holds and discontinuations in chronic lymphocytic leukemia

Aim: A retrospective chart review of ibrutinib-treated patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) was conducted. Patients & methods: Adults with CLL who initiated ibrutinib were followed for ≥6 months (n = 180). Results: Twenty-five percent of first-line ibrutinib patients experienced ≥1 dose reduction, mainly due to adverse events (AEs; 79%). Treatment discontinuations and dose holds occurred in 20 and 34% of patients, respectively, most commonly due to AEs (73 and 74%). Approximately one-quarter of relapsed/refractory ibrutinib patients experienced ≥1 dose reduction, mainly due to AEs (88%). Treatment discontinuation and dose holds occurred in 40% of patients (58 and 76% due to AEs, respectively). Conclusion: Dose reductions, holds and discontinuations were frequent in patients with CLL receiving ibrutinib in routine clinical practice.

Tolerability of palbociclib in younger and older patients with advanced breast cancer

Introduction Palbociclib is a small-molecule cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor used to treat hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 negative advanced breast cancer. Patient-specific factors impacting dose reductions or discontinuations are unknown. Methods The primary objective was to evaluate the association of age (<60 vs. ≥60 years) with palbociclib dose reductions or discontinuations secondary to neutropenia. This single-center, retrospective chart review included hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 negative advanced breast cancer patients ≥18 years treated with palbociclib between April 2015 and May 2020. Patients <60 years at the time of palbociclib initiation were in the younger group and patients ≥60 years were in the older group. Results Among the 107 patients included, younger patients were less likely than older patients to have a palbociclib starting dose <125 mg (0% vs. 11.9%, p = 0.02). Differences in palbociclib dose reductions or treatment discontinuations secondary to neutropenia were not detected (35.4% vs. 42.4%, p = 0.55). Neither the total number of palbociclib dose reductions (none: 54.2% vs. 49.1%, one: 33.3% vs. 42.4%, two: 12.5% vs. 8.5%, p = 0.61), nor the final dose of palbociclib (125 mg: 54.2% vs. 40.7%, 100 mg: 29.2% vs. 27.1%, 75 mg: 16.7% vs. 32.2%, p = 0.17) differed between younger and older patients. Conclusions Age (<60 vs. ≥60 years) was not associated with the rate of palbociclib dose reductions or discontinuations secondary to neutropenia. Older (≥60 years) patients were more likely to start palbociclib at lower doses which may impact neutropenia and non-neutropenic intolerance.

Dose Reductions Related to Adverse Effects in Patients with Waldenström Macroglobulinemia Treated with the BTK-Inhibitor Ibrutinib

The BTK-inhibitor ibrutinib is the first FDA approved therapy for Waldenström macroglobulinemia (WM) and produces overall response rates &gt;90% and long-term disease control in both treatment naïve and previously treated patients. Despite the remarkable efficacy of ibrutinib, dose reduction is often required for intolerance. In this study, we analyzed those patients requiring a dose reduction and evaluated the time to dose reduction, the symptoms leading to dose reduction, the rate of improvement in symptoms after dose reduction, and the hematologic response at 12 months after dose reduction. 385 patients received treatment with ibrutinib in our clinic from May 2012 through October 2020. Their baseline characteristics are shown in Table 1. Starting dose for these patients was 560 mg (n=11); 420 mg (n=358); 280 (n=15); 140 mg (n=1). Approximately 1/3 of all patients were treatment naïve at the time ibrutinib was initiated. Anemia, constitutional symptoms, and symptomatic hyperviscosity (or risk of hyperviscosity) were the most common reasons for treatment initiation. Reasons for dose reduction are shown in Table 2. Ninety-five patients (25%) required at least one dose reduction of ibrutinib. Twenty-three patients (6%) required a second dose reduction. Of the patients requiring dose reductions, 1 patient started at 280 mg and reduced to 140 mg, 91 patients started ibrutinib at 420 mg (1 patient ultimately had dose reduction to 70 mg, 22 patients to 140 mg, and 68 patients to 280 mg), and three patients started ibrutinib at 560 mg in the setting of Bing-Neel syndrome (2 patients had dose reduction to 420 mg and 1 patient to 280 mg). Patients requiring a dose reduction had a median age of 71 years (range, 46-96) at the time of ibrutinib initiation versus 66 years (range, 40-93) for those not requiring a dose reduction (p&lt;0.001). Forty-five patients (47%) of patients requiring dose reduction were female versus 98 (34%) not requiring dose reduction (p=0.017). Median time to first dose reduction was 7.3 months (range, 0.5-75) and median time to second dose reduction from initiation of ibrutinib was 23 months (range, 3-75). Of the 95 patients requiring a dose reduction, 40 patients (42% of all patients with dose reductions) had improvement in at least 1 of the medication side effects after the initial dose reduction. Twenty-two patients (23%) had complete resolution of adverse effects. Twenty-six patients (27%) had no change in symptoms and 10 of these patients required an additional dose reduction. After the second dose reduction, 5 patients had improvement or resolution in symptoms. Two patients had no adverse effects prior to dose reduction and medication was reduced simply due to drug interaction. Of the 48 patients with 1-year hematologic follow-up data available, 10 patients (21%) had improvement in hematologic response and 35 patients (73%) maintained their hematologic response despite dose reduction. Three patients (6%) had worsening of hematologic response after dose reduction. In conclusion, one quarter of WM patients in this series on ibrutinib required a dose reduction due to development of intolerable medication side effects. In the majority of these patients, adverse effects improved or resolved with dose reduction. Importantly, hematologic response remained stable or improved in most patients despite dose reduction. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Treon: BeiGene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Eli Lily: Research Funding; Abbvie/Pharmacyclics: Consultancy, Research Funding. Castillo: Abbvie: Consultancy, Research Funding; BeiGene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy; Roche: Consultancy; TG Therapeutics: Research Funding.

Efficacy and Safety of Ruxolitinib in the Treatment of Elderly Patients with Policythemia Vera Resistant/Intolerant to Hydroxyurea

Introduction: Ruxolitinib (Rux) has been recently approved as second-line therapy in patients (pts) with Polycythemia Vera (PV) resistant/intolerant to hydroxyurea (HU). Median age of PV pts enrolled in the pivotal Response trials was around 60 yrs; at present, no data is reported on the use of Rux in elderly pts. Aims: In a real-world cohort of PV pts treated with Rux, we investigated whether the efficacy and safety of Rux were comparable in pts who initiated therapy when aged ≥75 years compared with younger pts. Methods: After IRB approval, clinical/laboratory data of 934 WHO2016-defined PV pts followed in 29 Hematology Centers were retrospectively collected. Of them, 168 (17.9%) were considered resistant/intolerant to HU at any time during follow-up by responsible physician and shifted to Rux as second-line therapy. Results: Among the 168 pts treated with Rux, 42 (25%, median age 78.2 years) were aged ≥75 yrs at Rux start, 74 (44%, median age 67.7) were aged 60-74 and 52 (31%, median age 53) were &lt;60 at Rux start. No significant differences were observed between the 3 groups, apart from a lower need for phlebotomies in pts aged ≥75 yrs and lower presence of palpable spleen in older pts (age ≥60), that more frequently switched to Rux due to HU intolerance (Table 1). Median duration of HU treatment was 41.0 months (IQR 14.6 - 85.8), with a trend for a longer median treatment duration in pts aged ≥75 [61.0 months (IQR 21.5 - 89.6) vs 35.9 months (IQR 13.4 - 79.6), p=0.04]. Rux starting dose was similar across age groups; however, more elderly pts underwent Rux dose reductions during follow-up (45.2% in pts aged ≥75 vs 28.6% in younger pts, p=0.04). Responses during Rux therapy are reported in Table 2, with no significant differences between the 3 groups at any time. In the overall cohort, response on PV-related symptoms at 6 and 12 months was significantly higher in pts who switched to Rux because of HU intolerance; however, this difference was not observed in pts aged ≥75 yrs. As to the most common hematologic Rux-related toxicities, grade 3-4 anemia and thrombocytopenia were observed in only 2 (1.2%) and 5 (3%) pts, with no difference across age groups (p=0.45 and p=0.18). However, any grade anemia and thrombocytopenia during Rux were more frequently observed in pts aged ≥75 (68.3% vs 51.7% of anemia, p=0.06 and 12.2% vs 3.5% of thrombocytopenia in younger pts, p=0.04). Nineteen and 4 pts experienced infectious and thrombotic complications during Rux with incidence rates of 0.59 and 0.12 per 100 patient-months, respectively, comparably in younger and older (≥75) pts (p=0.75 and p=0.29, respectively). Notably, 6 infections were herpes simplex/zoster virus, comparably distributed between the 3 groups (p=0.60). Permanent Rux discontinuation was needed in 14 pts (8.3%) after a median Rux exposure of 7.8 months (IQR 4.6 - 17.6) (incidence: 0.41 per 100 pts/months). Discontinuation was comparable between age groups, with Rux stop in 4 pts aged ≥75 yrs and 10 younger pts (2.4% vs 5.2% at 8 months, log-rank p=0.75). At last follow-up, 2 pts had died (1 from 2 nd neoplasia after 19.1 months from Rux start and 1 from acute leukemia after 3.3 years), both pts aged 60-74 yrs. Conclusions. In this real-world analysis, use of Rux in HU resistant/intolerant elderly PV pts was effective and safe despite the more frequent need for dose reductions. Older age should not discourage Rux therapy, but stricter hematological monitoring may be suggested. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Latagliata: BMS Cellgene: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria. Breccia: Pfizer: Honoraria; Incyte: Honoraria; Bristol Myers Squibb/Celgene: Honoraria; Abbvie: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria. Bonifacio: Amgen: Honoraria; Bristol Myers Squibb: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria. Cavo: Sanofi: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Adaptive Biotechnologies: Consultancy, Honoraria; GlaxoSmithKline: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel Accommodations, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: TRAVEL, ACCOMMODATIONS, EXPENSES, Speakers Bureau; Bristol-Myers Squib: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Palandri: AOP: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sierra Oncology: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; CTI: Consultancy; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Comparison of Severe Toxicities Following High Dose Methotrexate Administration By Demographics and over Time in Pediatric Patients with Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

Background: Methotrexate (MTX) is a cornerstone of therapy for pediatric patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). Administration of high dose (HD) MTX requires hospitalization and concurrent intravenous fluids and leucovorin while awaiting drug excretion. HDMTX has been associated with acute adverse events (AEs), such as mucositis, neurotoxicity, and myelosuppression, that can impact quality of life and ability to administer subsequent chemotherapy. There are limited data evaluating differences in AEs after HDMTX among demographic groups. Objective: The objective of this study was to describe AEs for patients receiving HDMTX (defined as &gt;500 mg/m2 to account for dose reductions from protocol dosing) and to compare rates by age, race, ethnicity and dose number using a multicenter cohort. Methods: A multi-center retrospective study collected data on pediatric ALL patients ages 0-21 years at diagnosis who received at least one dose of HDMTX at Children's Healthcare of Atlanta or Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center from January 2010 through December 2020. Demographic (age, sex, race, ethnicity) and clinical (vital status, Down Syndrome, HDMTX doses) variables were manually abstracted from the electronic medical record. Algorithms were developed a priori based on Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v5 to identify the presence and grade of targeted AEs after HDMTX administration. The following AEs were abstracted for the time period from each HDMTX dose until the next HDMTX or other chemotherapy administration: mucositis, neurotoxicity, neutropenia, and thrombocytopenia. Only grade 4 neutropenia and grades 3-4 thrombocytopenia were collected. Institutional review board approval was obtained at each site. Descriptive and inferential statistics, including chi-square, Fisher's exact test, and generalized estimating equations (GEE) as appropriate, were calculated to evaluate differences in AEs by dichotomized age (&lt;10, 10+), race, ethnicity, and HDMTX administration number. All analyses were performed using SAS Enterprise Guide v7.1. Results: Across sites, 543 patients with ALL patients received HDMTX (2064 administrations). The median age at first HDMTX was 8.0 years (0.1-21.0); 230 (42.4%) were female, 381 (70.2%) were White, and 441 (81.2%) were Non-Hispanic or Latino (Table 1). The median number of HDMTX administrations was 4.0 (Range 1-10). In total, 469 (86.4%) patients had at least one AE. Mucositis occurred in 386 (71.1%) patients, grade 4 neutropenia occurred in 243 (50.1%) and grade 3-4 thrombocytopenia occurred in 156 (32.2%, Table 2). Mucositis, neurotoxicity, and thrombocytopenia were significantly more likely in patients 10+ years (p=0.02, p&lt;0.01, p&lt;0.01, respectively, Table 2). There were no significant differences in AE rates by race or ethnicity. Table 3 describes percentages of administrations with each AE grade. Half of HDMTX administrations had at least one AE. AE rates decreased significantly from first to fourth administration (67.5% of first and 33.0% of fourth administrations with at least one AE, p&lt;0.01). Rates of mucositis and neurotoxicity individually decreased over administrations (p&lt;0.01, Table 3). Conclusion: AEs after administration of HDMTX are common, with 86% of patients experiencing at least one AE after receipt of HDMTX and half of administrations leading to at least one AE. Greater than half of patients experienced mucositis and neutropenia. Older patients experienced significantly more mucositis, neurotoxicity, and thrombocytopenia. Unsurprisingly, we found that overall the rate of AEs was highest after the first HDMTX administration and decreased significantly across doses, which is likely due to dose reductions in HDMTX or concurrent antimetabolite therapy and to increased supportive care (hydration and leucovorin) after experience of an AE. Chart abstraction is ongoing at a third hospital that will increase the sample size of patients, particularly those of Hispanic/Latino ethnicity, to delineate potential differences by race and ethnicity. In addition, current analyses are evaluating the impact of supportive care and dosing changes between administrations on the burden of HDMTX-related AEs and differences by age. The results of this study will provide valuable data regarding who is at highest risk for AEs and can be used to tailor supportive care during this potentially toxic chemotherapy. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Bernhardt: Bristol Myers Squibb: Research Funding; BTG International: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Research Funding; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Mesoblast: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Servier: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. O'Brien: Jazz: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria, Research Funding. Ramsey: BTG Specialty Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Research Funding.