SU-E-I-57: Estimating the Occupational Eye Lens Dose in Interventional Radiology Using Active Personal Dosimeters Worn On the Chest

2015 ◽  
Vol 42 (6Part6) ◽  
pp. 3254-3254
Author(s):  
A Omar ◽  
M Marteinsdottir ◽  
N Kadesjo ◽  
A Fransson
2017 ◽  
Vol 37 (1) ◽  
pp. 145-159 ◽  
Author(s):  
Artur Omar ◽  
Nils Kadesjö ◽  
Charlotta Palmgren ◽  
Maria Marteinsdottir ◽  
Tony Segerdahl ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 32 ◽  
pp. 260
Author(s):  
Anna Zagorska ◽  
Kristina Bliznakova ◽  
Annalisa Trianni ◽  
Jenia Vassileva

2016 ◽  
Vol 125 ◽  
pp. 75-81 ◽  
Author(s):  
M.J. Safari ◽  
J.H.D. Wong ◽  
K.A.A. Kadir ◽  
F.M. Sani ◽  
K.H. Ng

2019 ◽  
Vol 185 (2) ◽  
pp. 151-156 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mamoru Kato ◽  
Koichi Chida ◽  
Takato Ishida ◽  
Hideto Toyoshima ◽  
Yasuyuki Yoshida ◽  
...  

Abstract Neurovascular interventional radiology (neuro-IR) procedures tend to require an extended fluoroscopic exposure time and repeated digital subtraction angiography. To evaluate the actual measurement of eye lens dose using a direct eye dosemeter in neuro-IR physicians is important. Direct dosimetry using the DOSIRIS™ (IRSN, France) [3 mm dose equivalent, Hp(3)] was performed on 86 cases. Additionally, a neck personal dosemeter (glass badge) [0.07 mm dose equivalent, Hp(0.07)] was worn outside the protective apron to the left of the neck. The average doses per case of neuro-IR physicians were 0.04 mSv/case and 0.02 mSv/case, outside and inside the radiation protection glasses, respectively. The protective effect of radiation protection glasses was approximately 60%. The physician eye lens dose tended to be overestimated by the neck glass badge measurements. A correct evaluation of the lens dose [Hp(3)] using an eye dosemeter such as DOSIRIS™ is needed for neuro-IR physicians.


2020 ◽  
pp. 084653712091175
Author(s):  
Nassim-Albert Merrachi ◽  
Roxanne Bouchard-Bellavance ◽  
Pierre Perreault ◽  
Patrick Gilbert ◽  
Gilles Soulez ◽  
...  

Purpose: To quantify eye lens dose in interventional radiology and assess whether neck dosimeter is a good surrogate to evaluate eye lens dosimetry. Methods: Radiation exposure was prospectively measured in 9 interventional radiologists between May and October 2017. Standard Hp(0,07) thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLDs) were worn at the neck outside the lead apron, and 2 dedicated eye lens Hp(3) TLDs were placed just above the eyes, one midline and another at the outer edge of the left eye. Correlations between eye lens and neck TLD doses were assessed with Pearson coefficient, and linear regression was used to predict eye lens dose from neck TLD values. Results: Eye lens dose without eye protection was 0.18 ± 0.11 (mean ± standard deviation; 0.08-0.41) mSv per workday and 35.3 ± 6.6 mSv (16.3-82.9) annually (200 workdays/year). Five (56%) radiologists exceeded the 20 mSv annual eye lens dose limit. Eye lens doses from left and central TLDs were 12.46 ± 3.02 and 9.29 ± 3.38 mSv, respectively ( P = .027). Mean eye lens (left and central) and neck TLD doses were 10.87 ± 2.67 and 16.56 ± 5.67 mSv, respectively ( P = .008). Pearson correlation coefficient between both eye lens TLD and between mean eye lens TLD and neck TLD doses were 0.91 and 0.92, respectively. Average of eye lens dose was 0.0179 + (0.5971 × neck dose). Conclusion: Full-time interventional radiologists are likely to suffer from deterministic radiation effects to the eye lens, especially on the left side. Neck TLD significantly overestimates eye lens dose. However, eye lens doses are highly correlated with neck doses and may be predicted from the neck TLD values.


2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 30-37
Author(s):  
Nazaroh Kartubi ◽  
Assef Firnando Firmansyah ◽  
Pardi Pardi ◽  
Caecilia Tuti Budiantari

Because of the negative impact of radiation on the eye lens and the changes recommended by the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) 103 (2007) from 150 to 20 mSv (2 rem, the Regulation of BAPETEN Head No. 4 (2013) article 56 give the instruction that Monitoring of eye lens dose should be implemented starting from March 13, 2016, more intensive around the eye lens. To prepare eye lens dose assessment, The Center for Safety Technology and Radiation Metrology (CSTRM) - NNEA study the response of TLD-700H against the X-ray: N (80), N (100) and N (120) energies (usually used in the interventional radiology). Goals and objectives of this study were to obtain the response/calibrated TLD-700H which is traceable to the international system (SI) and TLD-700H can be used for an eye lens dose assessment in Indonesia. Twenty-one TLDs were irradiated with seven dosage variations (0.1; 0.5; 1; 5; 10; 15; 20) mSv at the Secondary Standard Dosimetry Laboratory (SSDL) - Jakarta. After being stored for 24 hours, the TLD were read by using TLD-Reader. The Dosimeter Response, R against doses of X-ray were: R(N80) = 34.595x + 0.1262; R² = 0.9986; R(N100) = 24.484x + 1.1357; R² = 0.9993; and R(N120) = 27.908x - 5.1065; R² = 0.9971. R: correlation coefficient, x: doses; These calibration responses can be used for eye lens dose assessment in Indonesia.


2018 ◽  
Vol 52 ◽  
pp. 83-84 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paolo Scalchi ◽  
Jessica Magagna ◽  
Giuseppe Mansi Montenegro ◽  
Mario Beghetto ◽  
Luca Boi ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 183 (4) ◽  
pp. 522-528 ◽  
Author(s):  
W J Garzón ◽  
H Khoury ◽  
S A M Ovalle ◽  
R B Medeiros

Abstract The aim of this article was to verify the performance of the Mirion InstadoseTM dosemeter under clinical conditions and to compare its response in typical X-ray fields used during interventional and cardiology procedures with the TLD-100, usually used for radiation dosimetry. It was also objective of this study to verify the feasibility of using the InstadoseTM dosemeter response at the chest level for estimation of occupational eye lens dose in cardiology and interventional radiology. Initially the response of the dosemeter was tested using continuous X-ray beams and the results showed that the Instadose dosemeter present a satisfactory behavior of the most important dosimetric properties based on the tests as described in the IEC 62387 standard. The measurements performed in clinical conditions showed that the InstadoseTM dosemeter response was comparable to that of TL dosemeters used in interventional radiology and cardiology procedures and there is a correlation between the eye lens doses and the chest doses measured with the InstadoseTM. Based on the results obtained, we recommend the use of the InstadoseTM dosemeter for purposes of occupational whole-body monitoring of medical staff in interventional radiology and cardiology procedures.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document