Frequency modulation detection, frequency selectivity, and speech recognition in noise by hearing‐impaired listeners.

2009 ◽  
Vol 125 (4) ◽  
pp. 2632-2632
Author(s):  
Van Summers ◽  
Matthew Makashay ◽  
Joshua Bernstein ◽  
Sarah Melamed ◽  
Marjorie Leek
Keyword(s):  
Speech Recognition ◽  
Frequency Modulation ◽  
Frequency Selectivity ◽  
Hearing Impaired ◽  
Detection Frequency ◽  
Modulation Detection ◽  
Frequency Modulation Detection ◽  
Speech Recognition In Noise

Frequency Modulation Detection by Normally Hearing and Profoundly Hearing-Impaired Listeners

1987 ◽  
Vol 30 (4) ◽  
pp. 558-563 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ken W. Grant
Keyword(s):  
Amplitude Modulation ◽  
Frequency Modulation ◽  
Normal Hearing ◽  
Hearing Impaired ◽  
Frequency Difference ◽  
Constant Amplitude ◽  
Modulation Detection ◽  
Frequency Modulation Detection ◽  
Frequency Modulations

The ability of normally hearing and profoundly hearing-impaired subjects to detect frequency modulations was evaluated under conditions where the amplitudes of the test signals were either constant (CA), sinusoidally modulated (SAM), or randomly modulated (RAM). Results for hearing-impaired listeners showed larger frequency difference limens (DLFM) than those for normally hearing listeners for all test frequencies (100 to 1000 Hz) and for all amplitude conditions. For both normal-hearing and hearing-impaired subjects, the DFLM was smallest for the constant amplitude condition and largest for the randomly modulated condition. Differences in performance between the RAM and CA conditions were generally much larger for impaired listeners than for normally hearing listeners. With random amplitude modulation, DLFMs for the hearing-impaired subjects were approximately 36 times larger than those for normally hearing subjects.

An algorithm to improve speech recognition in noise for hearing-impaired listeners: Consonant identification and articulatory feature transmission

2014 ◽  
Vol 135 (4) ◽  
pp. 2412-2412 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eric W. Healy ◽  
Sarah E. Yoho ◽  
Yuxuan Wang ◽  
Frederic Apoux ◽  
Carla L. Youngdahl ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Speech Recognition ◽  
Hearing Impaired ◽  
Speech Recognition In Noise

Test Retest Reliability of Jittered Frequency Modulation Detection Test

2019 ◽  
Vol 10 (11) ◽  
pp. 2493
Author(s):  
A. Vidyarani ◽  
Arivudai Nambi Pitchaimuthu ◽  
P.M. Akhilesh ◽  
Jestin Joseph Chacko
Keyword(s):  
Frequency Modulation ◽  
Retest Reliability ◽  
Modulation Detection ◽  
Frequency Modulation Detection ◽  
Test Retest Reliability

Frequency modulation detection atomic force microscopy in the liquid environment

2001 ◽  
Vol 72 (S1) ◽  
pp. S129-S132 ◽  
Author(s):  
S.P. Jarvis ◽  
T. Ishida ◽  
T. Uchihashi ◽  
Y. Nakayama ◽  
H. Tokumoto
Keyword(s):  
Atomic Force Microscopy ◽  
Frequency Modulation ◽  
Liquid Environment ◽  
Force Microscopy ◽  
Atomic Force ◽  
Modulation Detection ◽  
Frequency Modulation Detection

Tamed frequency modulation detection analysis with NEC receivers

2000 ◽  
Vol 147 (3) ◽  
pp. 149 ◽  
Author(s):  
I.S. Barbounakis ◽  
P. Stavroulakis ◽  
J. Gardiner
Keyword(s):  
Frequency Modulation ◽  
Detection Analysis ◽  
Modulation Detection ◽  
Frequency Modulation Detection

Suprathreshold auditory processing and speech recognition in noise for hearing‐impaired listeners.

2010 ◽  
Vol 127 (3) ◽  
pp. 1903-1903
Author(s):  
Van Summers ◽  
Joshua G. W. Bernstein ◽  
Matthew J. Makashay ◽  
Golbarg Mehraei ◽  
Sarah Melamed ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Speech Recognition ◽  
Auditory Processing ◽  
Hearing Impaired ◽  
Speech Recognition In Noise
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document