Estimating the probability density function of transmission loss in an uncertain ocean using machine learning

2018 ◽  
Vol 144 (3) ◽  
pp. 1744-1744
Author(s):  
Brandon M. Lee ◽  
David R. Dowling
Keyword(s):  
Machine Learning ◽  
Probability Density Function ◽  
Probability Density ◽  
Density Function ◽  
Transmission Loss

scholarly journals Automated reliability assessment for spectroscopic redshift measurements

2018 ◽  
Vol 611 ◽  
pp. A53 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Jamal ◽  
V. Le Brun ◽  
O. Le Fèvre ◽  
D. Vibert ◽  
A. Schmitt ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Machine Learning ◽  
Probability Density Function ◽  
Probability Density ◽  
Density Function ◽  
Classification Accuracy ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Reliability Assessment ◽  
Machine Learning Algorithms ◽  
Large Set ◽  
Public Data

Context. Future large-scale surveys, such as the ESA Euclid mission, will produce a large set of galaxy redshifts (≥106) that will require fully automated data-processing pipelines to analyze the data, extract crucial information and ensure that all requirements are met. A fundamental element in these pipelines is to associate to each galaxy redshift measurement a quality, or reliability, estimate.Aim. In this work, we introduce a new approach to automate the spectroscopic redshift reliability assessment based on machine learning (ML) and characteristics of the redshift probability density function.Methods. We propose to rephrase the spectroscopic redshift estimation into a Bayesian framework, in order to incorporate all sources of information and uncertainties related to the redshift estimation process and produce a redshift posterior probability density function (PDF). To automate the assessment of a reliability flag, we exploit key features in the redshift posterior PDF and machine learning algorithms.Results. As a working example, public data from the VIMOS VLT Deep Survey is exploited to present and test this new methodology. We first tried to reproduce the existing reliability flags using supervised classification in order to describe different types of redshift PDFs, but due to the subjective definition of these flags (classification accuracy ~58%), we soon opted for a new homogeneous partitioning of the data into distinct clusters via unsupervised classification. After assessing the accuracy of the new clusters via resubstitution and test predictions (classification accuracy ~98%), we projected unlabeled data from preliminary mock simulations for the Euclid space mission into this mapping to predict their redshift reliability labels.Conclusions. Through the development of a methodology in which a system can build its own experience to assess the quality of a parameter, we are able to set a preliminary basis of an automated reliability assessment for spectroscopic redshift measurements. This newly-defined method is very promising for next-generation large spectroscopic surveys from the ground and in space, such as Euclid and WFIRST.

Seismic attribute selection for machine-learning-based facies analysis

Geophysics ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 85 (2) ◽  
pp. O17-O35
Author(s):  
Jie Qi ◽  
Bo Zhang ◽  
Bin Lyu ◽  
Kurt Marfurt
Keyword(s):  
Machine Learning ◽  
Probability Density Function ◽  
Probability Density ◽  
Density Function ◽  
Facies Analysis ◽  
Attribute Selection ◽  
Seismic Facies ◽  
High Dimensional ◽  
Karst Collapse ◽  
Optimum Number

Interpreters face two main challenges in seismic facies analysis. The first challenge is to define, or “label,” the facies of interest. The second challenge is to select a suite of attributes that can differentiate a target facies from the background reflectivity. Our key objective is to determine which seismic attributes can best differentiate one class of chaotic seismic facies from another using modern machine-learning technology. Although simple 1D histograms provide a list of candidate attributes, they do not provide insight into the optimum number or combination of attributes. To address this limitation, we have conducted an exhaustive search whereby we represent the target and background training facies by high-dimensional Gaussian mixture models (GMMs) for each potential attribute combination. The first step is to choose candidate attributes that may be able to differentiate chaotic mass-transport deposits and salt diapirs from the more conformal, coherent background reflectors. The second step is to draw polygons around the target and background facies to provide the labeled data to be represented by GMMs. Maximizing the distance between all GMM facies pairs provides the optimum number and combination of attributes. We use generative topographic mapping to represent the high-dimensional attribute data by a lower dimensional 2D manifold. Each labeled facies provides a probability density function on the manifold that can be compared to the probability density function of each voxel, providing the likelihood that a given voxel is a member of each of the facies. Our first example maps chaotic seismic facies associated with the development of salt diapirs and minibasins. Our second example successfully delineates karst collapse underlying a shale resource play from north Texas.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document