Dry Needling Compared With Manual Pressure Trigger Point Manual Therapy for Improving Pain in Patients Experiencing Myofascial Neck Pain: A Critically Appraised Topic

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-8
Author(s):  
Alicea E. Taylor-Meza ◽  
Kelsey N. Bahe ◽  
Michael A. Trevino ◽  
Jennifer L. Volberding ◽  
Aric J. Warren
Keyword(s):  
Neck Pain ◽  
Manual Therapy ◽  
Trigger Point ◽  
Clinical Question ◽  
Dry Needling ◽  
Bottom Line ◽  
Low Level ◽  
Pressure Threshold ◽  
Pain Pressure Threshold ◽  
Manual Pressure

Focused Clinical Question: What is the efficacy of dry needling (DN) compared to ischemic compression point therapy for improving pain and pain pressure threshold (PPT) in patients experiencing myofascial neck pain? Clinical Bottom Line: There is low-level evidence suggesting DN has the potential to elicit greater improvements in pain and PPT relief compared to ischemic compression techniques for individuals with myofascial neck pain.

scholarly journals Effects of Dry Needling of the Upper Trapezius Active Trigger Points on Pain and Pain Pressure Threshold in Women With Chronic Non-Specific Neck Pain

2021 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 29-29
Author(s):  
Fereshteh Navaee ◽  
◽  
Marzieh Yassin ◽  
Javad Sarrafzade ◽  
Reza Salehi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Neck Pain ◽  
Trigger Point ◽  
Local Treatment ◽  
Trigger Points ◽  
Dry Needling ◽  
Upper Trapezius ◽  
Pressure Threshold ◽  
Pain Pressure Threshold ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Passive Stretch

Background and Objectives: The purpose of the present study was to examine the effectiveness of dry needling as local treatment of upper trapezius trigger points related to chronic neck pain on pain and pain pressure threshold in women with chronic nonspecific neck pain. Methods: Thirty females with an active myofascial trigger point of the upper trapezius muscle were randomly divided into two groups: dry needling with passive stretch (n=15) and passive stretch alone (n=15). They received 5 sessions of the intervention for three weeks. The outcomes were pain intensity and pain pressure threshold. Every outcome was recorded at baseline and 2 days after the fifth session. Results: Significant improvement in pain and pain pressure threshold was observed in both groups (P=0.0001) after the treatment. The results of the independent t-test showed a significant difference in measurements between the dry needling and passive stretch groups (P<0.05). Conclusion: Dry needling with passive stretch can be more effective on pain and pain pressure threshold than passive stretching alone in short term in women with nonspecific neck pain.

Dry Needling Versus Sham Needling for Myofascial Pain Syndrome: A Critically Appraised Topic

2020 ◽  
Vol 25 (6) ◽  
pp. 289-293
Author(s):  
Melissa Jack ◽  
Ryan Tierney ◽  
Jamie Mansell ◽  
Anne Russ
Keyword(s):  
Myofascial Pain ◽  
Trigger Point ◽  
Pain Syndrome ◽  
Myofascial Pain Syndrome ◽  
Clinical Question ◽  
Myofascial Trigger Point ◽  
Dry Needling ◽  
Bottom Line

Focused Clinical Question: In patients with myofascial trigger point pain, does dry needling result in greater decreases in pain compared to sham needling? Clinical Bottom Line: The evidence supporting dry needling as more effective than sham needling in reducing patients’ pain is mixed.

scholarly journals Dry needling in the deactivation of myofascial trigger points

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elaine Cruz ◽  
Davi Rodrigues Martins ◽  
Richarlison Amaral ◽  
Rodrigo Manhães ◽  
Mairkon Almeida Soares
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Range Of Motion ◽  
Randomized Clinical Trials ◽  
Trigger Point ◽  
Pressure Pain Threshold ◽  
Trigger Points ◽  
Dry Needling ◽  
Myofascial Trigger Points ◽  
Pressure Threshold ◽  
Pain Pressure Threshold

Dry Needling (DN) is a technique indicated to treat injuries of muscle origin and widely used in the deactivation of myofascial trigger points (PGMs). Its application almost always produces immediate effect, decreasing pain and increasing range of motion. The main objective of the present study was to verify the effectiveness of Dry Needling in the deactivation of myofascial trigger points. A search was carried out through three distinct databases and 10 articles dating from the last ten years were selected, with a score greater than or equal to six, in the classification of the PEDro platform (Physiotherapy Evidence Database). All selected articles were classified as randomized controlled trials, where eight are blind randomized clinical trials and two double blind randomized clinical trials. Outcomes ranged from decreased trigger points, increased range of motion, pain intensity and pain pressure threshold. The studies included in this review suggest that Dry Needling has a fundamental role in the treatment of PGMs, mainly increasing the pressure pain threshold, thus suggesting trigger point deactivation.

Comparison of Upper Trapezius and Infraspinatus Myofascial Trigger Point Therapy by Dry Needling in Overhead Athletes With Unilateral Shoulder Impingement Syndrome

2019 ◽  
Vol 28 (3) ◽  
pp. 243-249 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fahimeh Kamali ◽  
Ehsan Sinaei ◽  
Maryam Morovati
Keyword(s):  
Shoulder Pain ◽  
Trigger Point ◽  
Direct Application ◽  
Shoulder Impingement Syndrome ◽  
Dry Needling ◽  
Shoulder Impingement ◽  
Overhead Athletes ◽  
Upper Trapezius ◽  
Pressure Threshold ◽  
Pain Pressure Threshold

Context: Chronic musculoskeletal disorders in the shoulder joint are often associated with myofascial trigger points (MTrPs), particularly in the upper trapezius (UT) muscle. Dry needling (DN) is a treatment of choice for myofascial pain syndrome. However, local lesions and severe postneedle soreness sometimes hamper the direct application of DN in the UT. Therefore, finding an alternative point of treatment seems useful in this regard. Objective: To compare the efficacy of UT versus infraspinatus (ISP) DN on pain and disability of subjects with shoulder pain. The authors hypothesized that ISP DN could be as effective as the direct application of DN in UT MTrP. Design: Single-blind randomized clinical trial. Setting: Sports medicine physical therapy clinic. Participants: A total of 40 overhead athletes (age = 36 [16] y; 20 females and 20 males) with unilateral shoulder impingement syndrome were randomly assigned to the UT DN (n = 21) and ISP DN (n = 19) groups. Intervention: An acupuncture needle was directly inserted into the trigger point of UT muscle in the UT DN group and of ISP muscle in the ISP DN group. DN was applied in 3 sessions (2-day interval between each sessions) for each group. Main Outcome Measures: Pain intensity (visual analog scale), pain pressure threshold, and disability in the arm, shoulder, and hand were assessed before and after the interventions. Results: Pain and disability decreased significantly in both groups (P < .001) and pain pressure threshold increased significantly only in the ISP group (P = .02). However, none of the outcome measures showed a significant intergroup difference after treatments (P > .05). Conclusions: Application of DN for active MTrPs in the ISP can be as effective as direct DN of active MTrPs in the UT in improving pain and disability in athletes with shoulder pain, and may be preferred due to greater patient comfort in comparison with direct UT needling.

scholarly journals Comparative study of post-intervention soreness between dry needling and percutaneus needle electrolysis

2019 ◽  
Vol 02 (02) ◽  
pp. 064-064
Author(s):  
Ciórraga López JL ◽  
Vega Moreu P.
Keyword(s):  
Trigger Point ◽  
Trigger Points ◽  
Dry Needling ◽  
Post Intervention ◽  
Time Interaction ◽  
Visual Analog Scales ◽  
Pressure Threshold ◽  
Extensor Muscles ◽  
Pain Pressure Threshold ◽  
Group B

Abstract Aims The aim of this research was to study the appearance of soreness after dry needling (DN) and percutaneous needle electrolysis (PNE) in latent trigger points of the extensor muscle of the posterior forearm region. Material and Methods A pre-test/post-test pilot study was performed, in which 15 volunteers with latent trigger points in the extensor muscles of the posterior forearm region were randomly distributed into a group A who received treatment with DN and a group B who received treatment with PNE. Before and after the intervention, algometry measurements were performed at the site where the trigger point was found, and, after the intervention the patient was asked to complete two visual analog scales (VAS) to evaluate pain during the intervention and a second scale to measure pain once the needle had been removed. In addition, the same scale was performed after 24 hours, 72 hours, and 1 week after the dry needling. The statistical analysis was performed using the SPSS program version 24.0, evaluating the normality of the variables using the Shapiro-Wilk test, as the sample was less than 50 subjects. P values of > 0.05 were considered normal. Results The ANOVA revealed a significant effect for time on the decrease of the VAS scores, both in the groups of dry needling (P < 0.001), as well as in the group of PNE (P < 0.001). In contrast, a group-time interaction was not observed (P = 0.824), ruling out statistically significant differences between the DN group and the PNE group. The Student's t-test showed a significantly decreased pain pressure threshold between the pre and post algometry, both in the group of DN (P < 0.001) and the group of PNE (P < 0.003). However, no statistically significant differences were found between both groups in pre and post algometry (P = 0.457). Conclusion All patients presented post-needling soreness, without significant differences between DN and PNE interventions. The most intense pain was registered minutes after the dry needling, which then decreased without significant differences, reaching 0 after 72 hours, in most cases. Neither of the two techniques caused increased pain in response to pressure in a significantly different manner. No relationship was observed between a greater number of LTRs and post-needling pain. There was a correlation between pain experienced during the intervention and pain 24 hours after the needling. The levels of post-intervention pain secondary to the application of DN and PNE in latent trigger points of the extensor muscles of the posterior forearm region did not present significant differences among study subjects in both intervention groups.

Comparison of the Short-Term Outcomes Between Trigger Point Dry Needling and Trigger Point Manual Therapy for the Management of Chronic Mechanical Neck Pain: A Randomized Clinical Trial

2014 ◽  
Vol 44 (11) ◽  
pp. 852-861 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rocio Llamas-Ramos ◽  
Daniel Pecos-Martín ◽  
Tomás Gallego-Izquierdo ◽  
Inés Llamas-Ramos ◽  
Gustavo Plaza-Manzano ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Neck Pain ◽  
Randomized Clinical Trial ◽  
Manual Therapy ◽  
Trigger Point ◽  
Dry Needling ◽  
Short Term

Effects of Kinesio Taping on Post-Needling Induced Pain After Dry Needling of Active Trigger Point in Individuals With Mechanical Neck Pain

2020 ◽  
Vol 43 (1) ◽  
pp. 32-42
Author(s):  
Jose Luis Arias-Buría ◽  
María M. Franco-Hidalgo-Chacón ◽  
Joshua A. Cleland ◽  
María Palacios-Ceña ◽  
Stella Fuensalida-Novo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Neck Pain ◽  
Trigger Point ◽  
Dry Needling ◽  
Kinesio Taping
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document