TRACKING TRACES OF PREDATION AND PARASITISM ON FOSSIL ECHINOIDS THROUGH GEOLOGIC TIME

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lyndsey Farrar ◽  
◽  
Erin Graves ◽  
Elizabeth Petsios ◽  
Roger W. Portell ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Author(s):  
Joseph Graham ◽  
William Newman ◽  
John Stacy
Keyword(s):  

2010 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 194-199 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shaochun DONG ◽  
Hongwei YIN ◽  
Gang XU

Author(s):  
Amanda Garcia ◽  
◽  
J. William Schopf ◽  
Shin-ichi Yokobori ◽  
Satoshi Akanuma ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Daniel R. Hummer ◽  
◽  
Robert M. Hazen ◽  
Xiaogang Ma ◽  
Joshua J. Golden ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Roxana T. Shafiee ◽  
Poppy J. Diver ◽  
Joseph T. Snow ◽  
Qiong Zhang ◽  
Rosalind E. M. Rickaby

AbstractAmmonia oxidation by archaea and bacteria (AOA and AOB), is the first step of nitrification in the oceans. As AOA have an ammonium affinity 200-fold higher than AOB isolates, the chemical niche allowing AOB to persist in the oligotrophic ocean remains unclear. Here we show that marine isolates, Nitrosopumilus maritimus strain SCM1 (AOA) and Nitrosococcus oceani strain C-107 (AOB) have contrasting physiologies in response to the trace metals iron (Fe) and copper (Cu), holding potential implications for their niche separation in the oceans. A greater affinity for unchelated Fe may allow AOB to inhabit shallower, euphotic waters where ammonium supply is high, but competition for Fe is rife. In contrast to AOB, AOA isolates have a greater affinity and toxicity threshold for unchelated Cu providing additional explanation to the greater success of AOA in the marine environment where Cu availability can be highly variable. Using comparative genomics, we predict that the proteomic and metal transport basis giving rise to contrasting physiologies in isolates is widespread across phylogenetically diverse marine AOA and AOB that are not yet available in pure culture. Our results develop the testable hypothesis that ammonia oxidation may be limited by Cu in large tracts of the open ocean and suggest a relatively earlier emergence of AOB than AOA when considered in the context of evolving trace metal availabilities over geologic time.


1991 ◽  
Vol 99 (5) ◽  
pp. 786-786
Author(s):  
John J. Flynn

2000 ◽  
Vol 6 ◽  
pp. 171-182 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ben A. LePage ◽  
Hermann W. Pfefferkorn

When one hears the term “ground cover,” one immediately thinks of “grasses.” This perception is so deep-seated that paleobotanists even have been overheard to proclaim that “there was no ground cover before grasses.” Today grasses are so predominant in many environments that this perception is perpetuated easily. On the other hand, it is difficult to imagine the absence or lack of ground cover prior to the mid-Tertiary. We tested the hypothesis that different forms of ground cover existed in the past against examples from the Recent and the fossil record (Table 1). The Recent data were obtained from a large number of sources including those in the ecological, horticultural, and microbiological literature. Other data were derived from our knowledge of Precambrian life, sedimentology and paleosols, and the plant fossil record, especially in situ floras and fossil “monocultures.” Some of the data are original observations, but many others are from the literature. A detailed account of these results will be presented elsewhere (Pfefferkorn and LePage, in preparation).


1914 ◽  
Vol s4-38 (223) ◽  
pp. 1-27 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Schuchert ◽  
J. Barrell

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document