REGIONAL 3D SURFICIAL GEOLOGICAL FRAMEWORK FOR SOUTHERN ONTARIO

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hazen Russell ◽  
◽  
Abigail K. Burt ◽  
Don I. Cummings ◽  
Ross D. Knight ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
1977 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 233-255
Author(s):  
J.F. Sykes ◽  
A.J. Crutcher

Abstract A two-dimensional Galerkin finite element model for flow and contaminant transport in variably saturated porous media is used to analyze the transport of chlorides from a sanitary landfill located in Southern Ontario. A representative cross-section is selected for the analysis. Predicted chloride concentrations are presented for the cross section at various horizon years.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Terry Carter ◽  
◽  
Hazen .A.J. Russell ◽  
Lee D. Fortner ◽  
Jordan K. Clark ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nazia Nawrin ◽  
◽  
Emmanuelle Arnaud ◽  
James Longstaffe ◽  
Elizabeth Priebe ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
Lisa Schlegl ◽  
Sali A. Tagliamonte

AbstractIn this study, we target the speech act of direction-giving using variationist sociolinguistic methods within a corpus of vernacular speech from six Ontario communities. Not only do we find social and geographical correlates to linguistic choices in direction-giving, but we also establish the influence of the physical layout of the community/place in question. Direction-giving in the urban center of Toronto (Southern Ontario) contrasts with five Northern Ontario communities. Northerners use more relative directions, while Torontonians use more cardinal directions, landmarks, and proper street names – for example, Go east on Bloor to the Manulife Centre. We also find that specific lexical choices (e.g., Take a right vs. Make a right) distinguish direction-givers in Northern Ontario from those in Toronto. These differences identify direction-giving as an ideal site for sociolinguistic and dialectological investigation and corroborate previous findings documenting regional variation in Canadian English.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document