scholarly journals Supplemental Material: Zircon (U-Th)/He thermochronology of Grand Canyon resolves 1250 Ma unroofing at the Great Unconformity and <20 Ma canyon carving

Author(s):  
Olivia G. Thurston ◽  
et al.

All geologic and thermochronologic constraints used in the forward models, major forward model results from the zircon radiation damage accumulation and annealing model (ZRDAAM) of Guenthner et al. (2013), and alternative HeFTy forward model result using different sample inputs.<br>

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Olivia G. Thurston ◽  
et al.

All geologic and thermochronologic constraints used in the forward models, major forward model results from the zircon radiation damage accumulation and annealing model (ZRDAAM) of Guenthner et al. (2013), and alternative HeFTy forward model result using different sample inputs.<br>


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Olivia G. Thurston ◽  
et al.

All geologic and thermochronologic constraints used in the forward models, major forward model results from the zircon radiation damage accumulation and annealing model (ZRDAAM) of Guenthner et al. (2013), and alternative HeFTy forward model result using different sample inputs.<br>


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Olivia G. Thurston ◽  
et al.

All geologic and thermochronologic constraints used in the forward models, major forward model results from the zircon radiation damage accumulation and annealing model (ZRDAAM) of Guenthner et al. (2013), and alternative HeFTy forward model result using different sample inputs.<br>


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Olivia G. Thurston ◽  
et al.

All geologic and thermochronologic constraints used in the forward models, major forward model results from the zircon radiation damage accumulation and annealing model (ZRDAAM) of Guenthner et al. (2013), and alternative HeFTy forward model result using different sample inputs.<br>


2015 ◽  
Vol 462 ◽  
pp. 402-408 ◽  
Author(s):  
Blas Pedro Uberuaga ◽  
Samrat Choudhury ◽  
Alfredo Caro

2006 ◽  
Vol 355 (1-3) ◽  
pp. 89-103 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Souidi ◽  
C.S. Becquart ◽  
C. Domain ◽  
D. Terentyev ◽  
L. Malerba ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Vol 73 (8) ◽  
pp. 2347-2365 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rebecca M. Flowers ◽  
Richard A. Ketcham ◽  
David L. Shuster ◽  
Kenneth A. Farley

PLoS ONE ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (12) ◽  
pp. e0242715
Author(s):  
Rikkert Hindriks

Measurements on physical systems result from the systems’ activity being converted into sensor measurements by a forward model. In a number of cases, inversion of the forward model is extremely sensitive to perturbations such as sensor noise or numerical errors in the forward model. Regularization is then required, which introduces bias in the reconstruction of the systems’ activity. One domain in which this is particularly problematic is the reconstruction of interactions in spatially-extended complex systems such as the human brain. Brain interactions can be reconstructed from non-invasive measurements such as electroencephalography (EEG) or magnetoencephalography (MEG), whose forward models are linear and instantaneous, but have large null-spaces and high condition numbers. This leads to incomplete unmixing of the forward models and hence to spurious interactions. This motivated the development of interaction measures that are exclusively sensitive to lagged, i.e. delayed interactions. The drawback of such measures is that they only detect interactions that have sufficiently large lags and this introduces bias in reconstructed brain networks. We introduce three estimators for linear interactions in spatially-extended systems that are uniformly sensitive to all lags. We derive some basic properties of and relationships between the estimators and evaluate their performance using numerical simulations from a simple benchmark model.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document