Diagnostic horizons in the Russian soil classification system

2012 ◽  
Vol 45 (9) ◽  
pp. 823-833 ◽  
Author(s):  
I. I. Lebedeva ◽  
M. I. Gerasimova
2013 ◽  
Vol 64 (1) ◽  
pp. 24-28 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tatiana Prokof'eva ◽  
Maria Gerasimova ◽  
Irina Lebedeva ◽  
Irina Martynenko

Abstract An attempt to incorporate the popular systematic of urban soils proposed by Marina Stroganova with colleagues into the new Russian soil classification system is presented. It was facilitated by the coincidence of approaches in both systems: priority of diagnostic horizons and their combinations as criteria to identify soil types being the main units in all Russian classifications. The central image of urban soils . urbanozem . in Stroganova.s system found its due place in the order of stratozems (urbostratozem type) owing to its diagnostic horizon . urbic, which combines artificial and natural properties, and to its simultaneous formation with the parent material.


2018 ◽  
pp. 58-70 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. I. Gerasimova ◽  
T. V. Ananko ◽  
D. E. Konyushkov

The analysis of the Soil Map of the Russian Federation (1 : 2.5 M scale, 1988) with identification of soils shown in each polygon in categories of the classification system of Russian soils (2004, 2008) is the first stage of work on creating the new digital soil map of Russia. It demonstrated the need to introduce a number of amendments to the classification system. They concern the definitions and names of diagnostic horizons and diagnostic features of soils. Thus, it is suggested that the mucky–dark humus horizon AH should be renamed as the mucky–humus horizon (as its properties do not fit the definition of the dark humus horizon in the system). Several new diagnostic features are introduced; for permafrost-affected soils, supra-permafrost accumulation of organic matter is designated by symbol cro. It is also suggested that the lists of soils at the subtype level, which reflects the development of certain diagnostic features, should be more flexible without their "rigid" linking to the given types. The aim of these changes is to reflect the accumulated information on the diversity of soils in Russia as displayed on the Soil Map of the Russian Federation (1988) and in the State Register of Soil Resources more adequately in the new classification system of Russian soils.


2009 ◽  
Vol 42 (9) ◽  
pp. 967-975 ◽  
Author(s):  
V. D. Tonkonogov ◽  
I. I. Lebedeva ◽  
M. I. Gerasimova ◽  
S. F. Khokhlov

CATENA ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 196 ◽  
pp. 104824 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexey Sorokin ◽  
Phillip Owens ◽  
Vince Láng ◽  
Zhuo-Dong Jiang ◽  
Erika Michéli ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 52 (10) ◽  
pp. 1170-1174 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. V. Lupachev ◽  
S. V. Gubin ◽  
M. I. Gerasimova

2021 ◽  
pp. 5-30
Author(s):  
N. V. Savitskaya ◽  
T. V. Ananko ◽  
M. I. Gerasimova

The development of the digital model of the soil map of Russia derived of the map of the Soviet Russian Federation, 1988, compiled in Dokuchaev Soil Science Institute, comprises the transfer of soil names in the initial legend to those in the new classification system of Russian soils (2004). Floodplain soils (only native) are represented by seven legend units (out of 205) that were named in terms of soil classification of USSR, 1977, and part of their names indicated ‘landscapes’ rather than soils, which disagrees with the principles of the new classification system. Basing on numerous publications and following the rules of the new system, soils were renamed. Most of them were referred to alluvial soil types within the synlithogenic trunk (Fluvisols), and their new names indicate both their properties and their zonal attachment. In order to obtain more adequate patterns of soils in river valleys additional soils were introduced including stratified-alluvial soils in the trunk of primary pedogenesis (Regosols). Simultaneously, the composition of polygons in the database was revised in accordance with regional data; human-modified soils were introduced (agro-soils and urbo-soils). 


2014 ◽  
Vol 47 (10) ◽  
pp. 959-967 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. V. Prokof’eva ◽  
M. I. Gerasimova ◽  
O. S. Bezuglova ◽  
K. A. Bakhmatova ◽  
A. A. Gol’eva ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document