SAT0319 Diagnostic Value of Ultrasound in Calcium Pyrophosphate Deposition Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2015 ◽  
Vol 74 (Suppl 2) ◽  
pp. 774.2-774
Author(s):  
E. Gamon ◽  
G. Mouterde ◽  
T. Barnetche ◽  
B. Combe
2021 ◽  
Vol 80 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 123.2-124
Author(s):  
E. Cipolletta ◽  
J. DI Battista ◽  
W. Grassi ◽  
E. Filippucci

Background:In recent years, ultrasonography (US) has emerged as an accurate and reliable tool for the diagnosis of calcium pyrophosphate (CPP) deposition disease (CPPD) in daily practice. Previous studies analyzed the diagnostic value of US findings in different tissues and joints. However, no studies have investigated the optimal US scanning protocol in the diagnosis of CPPD at patient level.Objectives:To assess the diagnostic value of the combinations of OMERACT-defined US findings of CPPD in the upper and lower limbs and to select the best minimal combination of anatomic structures to be scanned for diagnosing CPPD in inter-critical periods.Methods:Patients with a crystal-proven diagnosis of CPPD and age- and sex-matched disease-controls were prospectively enrolled in this cross-sectional, monocentric, case-control study. All subjects underwent a bilateral US examination of 9 hyaline cartilages (HC), 6 fibrocartilages (FC), 5 tendons, 1 joint recess and 1 ligament as follows: shoulder (glenoid FC, humeral HC and acromioclavicular FC), elbow (humeral HC and triceps tendon), wrist (triangular FC, scapho-lunate ligament, volar recess of the radio-lunate joint), hand (HC of the metacarpophalangeal joints from 2nd to 5th finger), hip (acetabular FC and femoral HC), knee (femoral condyles’ HC, meniscal FC, patellar and quadriceps tendons), ankle (talar HC, Achilles tendon and plantar fascia). US assessment was carried-out by a rheumatologist blinded to clinical data. CPP deposits were identified as presence/absence, according to the OMERACT definitions [1].Results:Ninety-five patients were enrolled: 45 CPPD patients (age: 72±10.6 years, disease duration: 5.6±7.8 years, female/male ratio: 1.3) and 50 age- and sex-matched disease-controls (18 with rheumatoid arthritis, 13 with osteoarthritis, 10 with psoriatic arthritis and 9 with gout).The FC of the medial and lateral meniscus were the most frequently involved targets of CPP deposits in cases (81.8% and 77.3% of patients, respectively), followed by the triangular FC of the wrist (68.2%), the HC of the femoral condyles (54.5%), the scapho-lunate ligament (52.3%) and the acetabular FC (50.0%). In all these anatomical targets, US findings indicative of CPP deposits were detected in a significantly higher percentage of cases than controls (p<0.01).The US scanning protocols that showed the best balance between sensitivity and specificity, the most sensitive and the most specific were shown in Table 1.Table 1.Diagnostic performances of different US scanning protocolsAnatomical targetsSESPLH+LH-Knee meniscal FC and wrist triangular FC0.86(0.76-0.96)0.86(0.73-0.94)6.35(3.17-12.72)0.13(0.06-0.30)Knee meniscal FC, wrist triangular FC and hip acetabular FC0.93(0.82-0.99)0.82(0.69-0.91)5.19(2.85-9.42)0.08(0.03-0.24)Hip acetabular FC, knee femoral condyles’ HC andwrist scapho-lunate ligament0.67(0.51-0.80)0.96(0.86-0.99)16.67(4.22-65.82)0.35(0.23-0.53)LH: likelihood ratio, SE: sensitivity, SP: specificity, US: ultrasonography.In all US scanning protocols, each anatomical target was assessed bilaterally.Figure 1 includes representative pictures showing CPP crystal deposits in different anatomical targets.A: Wrist, longitudinal scan of the triangular FC complex.B: Knee, longitudinal scan of the lateral meniscus.C: Hip, longitudinal scan of the acetabular labrum FC,D: Knee, longitudinal scan of the medial femoral condyle’s HC.Arrows: CPP crystal deposits at FC, arrowhead: CPP crystal deposits at HC.Conclusion:Our results suggest that bilateral US assessment of knee, wrist and hip provided acceptable sensitivity and specificity for diagnosing CPPD.References:[1]Filippou G, et al. Identification of calcium pyrophosphate deposition disease (CPPD) by ultrasound: reliability of the OMERACT definitions in an extended set of joints-an international multiobserver study by the OMERACT Calcium Pyrophosphate Deposition Disease Ultrasound Subtask Force. Ann Rheum Dis. 2018;77:1194-9.Disclosure of Interests:Edoardo Cipolletta: None declared, Jacopo Di Battista: None declared, Walter Grassi Speakers bureau: Walter Grassi has received speaking fees from AbbVie, Celgene, Grünenthal, Pfizer and Union Chimique Belge Pharma., Emilio Filippucci Speakers bureau: Emilio Filippucci. has received speaking fees from AbbVie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Janssen-Cilag, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche and Union Chimique Belge Pharma.


Skull Base ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 21 (S 01) ◽  
Author(s):  
Vasisht Srinivasan ◽  
Andrew Wensel ◽  
Paul Dutcher ◽  
Shawn Newlands ◽  
Mahlon Johnson ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 30
Author(s):  
Mai Thi Giang Thanh ◽  
Ngo Van Toan ◽  
Do Thi Thanh Toan ◽  
Nguyen Phu Thang ◽  
Ngoc Quang Dong ◽  
...  

This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to investigate the efficacy of fluorescence-based methods, visual inspections, and photographic visual examinations in initial caries detection. A literature search was undertaken in the PubMed and Cochrane databases. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were followed, and eligible articles published from 1 January 2009 to 30 October 2019 were included if they met the following criteria: they (1) assessed the accuracy of methods of detecting initial tooth caries lesions on occlusal, proximal, or smooth surfaces in both primary and permanent teeth (in clinical); (2) used a reference standard; (3) reported data regarding the sample size, prevalence of initial tooth caries, and accuracy of the methods. Data collection and extraction, quality assessment, and data analysis were conducted according to Cochrane standards Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2. Statistical analyses were performed using Review Manager 5.3 and STATA 14.0. A total of 12 eligible articles were included in the meta-analysis. The results showed that the sensitivity and specificity of fluorescence-based methods were 80% and 80%, respectively; visual inspection was measured at 80% and 75%, respectively; photographic visual examination was measured at 67% and 79%, respectively. We found that the visual method and the fluorescence method were reliable for laboratory use to detect early-stage caries with equivalent accuracy.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chang-Xi Chen ◽  
Mei-Ling Liu ◽  
Kai Cao ◽  
Mayinuer Yusufu ◽  
Jin-Da Wang

Objective: To evaluate the diagnostic value of optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) in detecting the choroidal neovascularization (CNV) in agerelated macular degeneration (AMD). Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed by searching Pubmed, Science Direct, Embase and Web of Science. The pooled sensitivity and specificity with 95% confidence intervals (CIs), area under the summary receiver operator characteristic curve (sROC), and the total accurate classification rate were used to evaluate OCTA’ diagnostic value of CNV in AMD patients. Results: Seven studies involving 517 eyes were included in the analysis. The mean age of subjects in each study ranged from 58.5 years to 81.7 years. Fluorescein angiography was applied as the gold standard in five studies. There were 350 eyes diagnosed with CNV, OCTA detected 301 eyes correctly, while among the 167 eyes without CNV, OCTA identified 150 correctly. The total accurate classification rate was 87.23%. The Spearman's rank correlation coefficient was 0.5, indicating that there was no significant threshold effect in the current study (S=8, p=0.103). The pooled sensitivity and pooled specificity were 0.89 (95%CI: 0.82,0.94) and 0.96 (95%CI: 0.85,1.00) respectively. The area under sROC was up to 0.911. Conclusion: The specificity of OCTA for the detection of CNV in AMD patients is extremely high, however, the sensitivity still needs to be improved. In general, the metaanalysis revealed that OCTA had a high diagnostic value for the detection of CNV in AMD patients.


2020 ◽  
Vol 79 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 1234.2-1235
Author(s):  
E. Cipolletta ◽  
G. Smerilli ◽  
R. Mashadi Mirza ◽  
A. DI Matteo ◽  
F. Salaffi ◽  
...  

Background:Only few articles evaluated the wrist in calcium pyrophosphate deposition disease (CPPD), although it is the second most frequent target of CPPD. Very recently, in a computed tomography (CT) study ligamentous calcifications were reported as a highly specific feature of CPPD at wrist level (1).Objectives:i) to determine the prevalence and distribution of the ultrasound (US) findings indicative of calcium pyrophosphate (CPP) crystal deposits at the wrist, with a particular focus on the dorsal aspect of the scapho-lunate ligament (SLL); ii) to investigate the diagnostic accuracy of US and conventional radiography (CR) in the evaluation of CPP crystal deposits at wrist level, iv) to assess the agreement between the different imaging techniques.Methods:Consecutive patients with a “definite” diagnosis of CPPD according to the Ryan and McCarty criteria and disease controls were prospectively included in this cross-sectional single-centre study. Dorsal part of the SLL, triangular fibrocartilage complex (TFCC), and volar recess of the radio-lunate joint were explored using US (according to EULAR standard scans and OMERACT definitions), CR and CT.Results:Sixty-one CPPD patients and 39 disease controls were enrolled. Two-hundred wrists were evaluated using both CR and US. CT data of 26 (13.0%) wrists were available: 20 wrists in CPPD patients and 6 wrists in controls. CPP crystal deposits were found by US in at least one wrist in 95.1% of CPPD patients and in 15.4% of controls (p<0.001). SLL calcification was reported in 83.6% of CPPD patients and in 5.1% of controls (p<0.001). CPP crystal deposits were observed by US at the SLL and/or radio-lunate joint in 5.7% of wrists and 6.6% of CPPD patients, but not at the TFCC of the same wrist. On CR, calcifications were found in at least one wrist in 72.1% of CPPD patients and in 0% of controls (p<0.001). Using the Ryan-McCarty criteria as a gold standard, the sensitivity, specificity and diagnostic accuracy were 0.72 (0.59-0.83), 1.0 (0.91-1.0) and 0.83 (0.74-0.90) for CR and 0.95 (0.86-0.99), 0.85 (0.69-0.94) and 0.91 (0.84-0.96) for US. Table 1 shows the agreement between the different imaging techniques.Tabel 1.Agreement between US and the other imaging techniques in the evaluation of CPP crystal deposits at the wrist.US-CR (n=200)US-CT (n=26)TFCC0.55 (0.43-0.67)0.70 (0.43-0.97)SLL0.23 (0.07-0.39)0.69 (0.41-0.97)RLJ0.25 (0.09-0.41)0.46 (0.12-0.80)Legend.n: number of the wrists,RLJ: volar recess of the radio-lunate joint. Values in brackets are the 95% confidence intervals of the Cohen’s kappa.Figure 1provides a pictorial evidence of the appearance of CPP crystal deposits in the SLL.A: CPP crystal deposits (curved arrow) at the TFCC. The SLL is not assessable due to superimposition of other bones.B: in the same patient of figure 1A, CT scan shows the presence of a calcification of the dorsal aspect of the SLL (arrow).C: dorsal longitudinal scan of the SLL: isolated hyperechoic spot (arrowheads) inside the ligament.D: dorsal longitudinal scan of the SLL showing the presence of a large aggregate extending towards the extensor tendons and hyperechoic spots (arrowheads) within it.Legend.iii: third extensor compartment,iv: fourth extensor compartment,l: lunate bone,s:scaphoid bone.Conclusion:This study supports the diagnostic accuracy of US in evaluating wrist involvement in CPPD patients. SLL calcifications are a specific US finding of CPPD at wrist level.References:[1]Ziegeler K, Diekhoff T, Hermann S, et al. Low-dose computed tomography as diagnostic tool in calcium pyrophosphate deposition disease arthropathy: focus on ligamentous calcifications of the wrist. Clin Exp Rheumatol 2019;37:826-33.Disclosure of Interests:Edoardo Cipolletta: None declared, Gianluca Smerilli: None declared, Riccardo Mashadi Mirza: None declared, Andrea Di Matteo Grant/research support from: the publication was conducted while Dr. Di Matteo was an ARTICULUM fellow, Fausto Salaffi Speakers bureau: Dr. Salaffi reports personal fees from Bristol Myers Squibb, personal fees from Pfizer, personal fees from Novartis, personal fees from AbbVie, personal fees from Roche, personal fees from Merck Sharp & Dohme Italia, outside the submitted work., Walter Grassi Speakers bureau: Prof. Grassi reports personal fees from AbbVie, personal fees from Celgene, personal fees from Grünenthal, personal fees from Pfizer, personal fees from Union Chimique Belge Pharma, outside the submitted work., Emilio Filippucci Speakers bureau: Dr. Filippucci reports personal fees from AbbVie, personal fees from Bristol-Myers Squibb, personal fees from Celgene, personal fees from Roche, personal fees from Union Chimique Belge Pharma, personal fees from Pfizer, outside the submitted work.


2015 ◽  
Vol 65 (639) ◽  
pp. e677-e691 ◽  
Author(s):  
Margaret P Astin ◽  
Tanimola Martins ◽  
Nicky Welton ◽  
Richard D Neal ◽  
Peter W Rose ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document