FRI0652-HPR Spinal Mobility in Long Standing Ankylosing Spondylitis. Application of Newly Developed Reference Intervals on Clinical Data

2016 ◽  
Vol 75 (Suppl 2) ◽  
pp. 1290.1-1290
Author(s):  
B. Sundström ◽  
L. Ljung ◽  
S. Wållberg-Jonsson
2020 ◽  
Vol 16 (4) ◽  
pp. 311-318 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gehan Elolemy ◽  
Ahmed Aboughanima ◽  
Sahar Ganeb ◽  
Haytham Elziat

Background: Ankylosing spondylitis (AS) is a chronic progressive inflammatory disease leading to functional limitations and subsequently impaired quality of life (QoL). Despite the fact that QoL was recognized as a significant perception, it was excluded from the core domains (defined by the Assessment of Spondyloarthritis International Society), because of ambiguity of measurement choice. Aim: To assess QoL in patients with AS using a generic; Short Form-36 (SF-36) and a diseasespecific; Ankylosing Spondylitis quality of life (ASQoL) instruments and to explore its relationship to the clinical characteristics, disease activity, functional status, and radiographic severity. Methods: A total of 47 AS patients who fulfilled modified New York criteria were included. Disease activity, functional status, spinal mobility, and radiographic severity were assessed by Bath AS Disease Activity Index (BASDAI), Bath AS Functional Index (BASFI), Bath AS Metrology Index (BASMI) and Bath AS Radiology Index (BASRI) respectively. SF-36 and ASQoL instruments evaluated Qol. Results: Physical health was more affected especially in patients with peripheral arthritis by SF-36 (p=0.008) and ASQoL (p=0.022) scores. Both SF-36 total and ASQoL scores correlated significantly with BASDAI (r = -0.329, p = 0.024 and r = 0.420, p = 0.003), BASFI (r = -0.399, p = 0.005 and r = 0.513, p=0.001) and BASMI (r = -0.382, p = 0.008 and r = 0.482, p= 0.001) respectively. Conclusion: QoL was impaired in AS patients with highest impact on physical health especially in association with peripheral arthritis. SF-36 and ASQol have a comparable achievement in the evaluation of QoL in AS patients and both physical function and spinal mobility were identified as predictors of poor QoL.


Author(s):  
Simone Canovi ◽  
Silvia Vezzani ◽  
Alessandra Polese ◽  
Andrea Frasoldati ◽  
Clara Schiatti ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 74 (6) ◽  
pp. 1218-1224 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sofia Ramiro ◽  
Astrid van Tubergen ◽  
Carmen Stolwijk ◽  
Désirée van der Heijde ◽  
Patrick Royston ◽  
...  

ObjectivesTo establish reference intervals (RIs) for spinal mobility measures as recommended for patients with axial spondyloarthritis, and to determine the effect of age, height and gender on spinal mobility, in normal individuals.MethodsA cross-sectional study (MOBILITY) was conducted among normal individuals aged 20–69 years. Recruitment was stratified by gender, age (10-year categories) and height (10 cm categories). Eleven spinal mobility measures were assessed. Age specific RIs and percentiles were derived for each measure.Results393 volunteers were included. All spinal mobility measures decreased with increasing age. Therefore, age specific RIs were developed. The 95% RIs (2.5th and 97.5th percentiles), as well as the 5th, 10th, 25th, 50th, 75th and 90th percentiles for each spinal mobility measure and different ages are presented. Mobility percentile curves were also plotted for each of the measures. For instance, the 95% RI for lateral spinal flexion was 16.2–28.0 cm for a 25-year-old subject, 13.2–25.0 cm for a 45-year-old subject and 10.1–21.9 cm for a 65-year-old subject. After adjustment for age, there was no need for gender specific RIs, while RIs of some measures are height-adjusted.ConclusionsAge specific RIs and percentiles were derived for each of the spinal mobility measures for normal individuals. These may guide clinicians when assessing the mobility of patients with axial spondyloarthritis. The RIs may serve as cut-off levels for ‘normal’ versus ‘abnormal’, whereas the mobility percentile curves may be used to assess the level of mobility of patients with axial spondyloarthritis.


1995 ◽  
Vol 24 (5) ◽  
pp. 314-315 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. V. Viitanen ◽  
H. Kautiainen ◽  
M. L. Kokko ◽  
S. Ala-peijari

2014 ◽  
Vol 2014 ◽  
pp. 1-9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lin-Fen Hsieh ◽  
Chih-Cheng Chuang ◽  
Ching-Shiang Tseng ◽  
James Cheng-Chung Wei ◽  
Wei-Chun Hsu ◽  
...  

Home exercise is often recommended for management of patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS); however, what kind of home exercise is more beneficial for patients with AS has not been determined yet. We aimed to compare the effectiveness of combined home exercise (COMB) and range-of-motion home exercise (ROM) in patients with AS. Nineteen subjects with AS completed either COMB (n=9) or ROM (n=10) program. The COMB program included range-of-motion, strengthening, and aerobic exercise while the ROM program consisted of daily range-of-motion exercise only. After exercise instruction, subjects in each group performed home exercise for 3 months. Assessment included cardiopulmonary exercise test, pulmonary function test, spinal mobility measurement, chest expansion, Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI), and other functional ability and laboratory tests. After exercise, the COMB group showed significant improvement in peak oxygen uptake (12.3%,P=0.008) and BASFI (P=0.028), and the changed score between pre- and postexercise data was significantly greater in the COMB group regarding peak oxygen uptake and BASFI. Significant improvement in finger-to-floor distance after 3-month exercise was found only in the COMB group (P=0.033). This study demonstrates that a combined home exercise is more effective than range-of-motion home exercise alone in aerobic capacity and functional ability.


1992 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 38-41 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. V. Viitanen ◽  
J. Suni ◽  
H. Kautiainen ◽  
M. Liimatainen ◽  
H. Takala

2015 ◽  
Vol 74 (Suppl 2) ◽  
pp. 1146.2-1146
Author(s):  
I. Sari ◽  
R.D. Inman ◽  
J. Chan ◽  
A. Omar ◽  
R. Ayearst ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document