scholarly journals THU0286 MANAGEMENT OF TAKAYASU ARTERITIS: A SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEW INFORMING THE 2018 UPDATE OF THE EULAR RECOMMENDATIONS FOR THE MANAGEMENT OF LARGE VESSEL VASCULITIS

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ana Filipa Águeda ◽  
Sara Monti ◽  
Raashid Luqmani ◽  
Frank Buttgereit ◽  
Maria C. Cid ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Literature Review ◽  
Systematic Literature Review ◽  
Takayasu Arteritis ◽  
Large Vessel Vasculitis ◽  
Large Vessel ◽  
Eular Recommendations

scholarly journals Imaging in diagnosis, outcome prediction and monitoring of large vessel vasculitis: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis informing the EULAR recommendations

RMD Open ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. e000612 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christina Duftner ◽  
Christian Dejaco ◽  
Alexandre Sepriano ◽  
Louise Falzon ◽  
Wolfgang Andreas Schmidt ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Literature Review ◽  
Systematic Literature Review ◽  
Outcome Prediction ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Large Vessel Vasculitis ◽  
Large Vessel ◽  
Eular Recommendations

scholarly journals AB1009 THE EFFICACY OF TOCILIZUMAB ON THE TREATMENT OF TAKAYASU ARTERITIS IN CHINESE CHILDREN

2020 ◽  
Vol 79 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 1798.2-1798
Author(s):  
C. Wang ◽  
H. Song ◽  
Z. Yu ◽  
M. Quan
Keyword(s):  
Takayasu Arteritis ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Large Vessel Vasculitis ◽  
Chinese Children ◽  
Large Vessel ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Imaging Data ◽  
Eular Recommendations ◽  
Interleukin 6 Receptor ◽  
Sparing Effect

Background:Takayasu arteritis (TA) is the most prevalent large-vessel vasculitis in children. Patients with TA have a high mobidity and mortality.It remains a therapeutic challenge because corticosteroids monotherapy can rarely cure TAK and the relapse rate is high during GC tapering.Objectives:The aim of this study is to investigate the efficacy and safety of tocilizumab (TCZ)in Chinese children with Takayasu arteritis(TAK).Methods:We retrospectively studied 6 TAK children treated with TCZ in our hospital from July 2017 to October 2018. The demographic and clinical data, laboratory examination results and vascular imaging data were collected.Results:Six pediatric patients with critical or refractory TAK treated with TCZ were analyzed, including 3 males and 3 females.The diagnosis age was ranging in age from 2 to 13 years(median age:7 years).Three patients were initially treated with TCZ and Mycophenolate Mofetil(MMF) as the first-line regimen without corticosteroid or with a quite rapid GC taper duration,two of which had lifte-threatening coronary arteries involved and heart failure.The other three paitients were swcithed to TCZ from conventional disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) or other biologics due to being refractory to them and recurrent relapses.Four patients were given TCZ at 4 weeks regular intervals for 10 to 22 months,while two patients withdrew TCZ because of disease deterioration and unbearable abdominal or chest pain after the second dose.After 6 months follow-up,four patients experienced significant clinical and biological improvement with angiographically progression in one patient. A corticosteroid-sparing effect is obvious. Drug-related side effects occur in 1 patients manifesting as a mild elevated liver fuction. Neither neutropenia nor infection was observed.Conclusion:Our study shows a clinical, biological, and radiological response in patients with refractory TAK treated with TCZ.References :[1]Hellmich B, Agueda A, Monti S,et al.2018 Update of the EULAR recommendations for the management of large vessel vasculitis. Ann Rheum Dis 2019;0:1–12. doi:10.1136/annrheumdis-2019-215672.[2]BravoMancheño B, Perin F, Guez Vázquez Del ReyMDMR, García Sánchez A, Alcázar Romero PP. Successful tocilizumab treatment in a child with refractory Takayasu arteritis.Pediatrics 2012;130(6):e1720-724.[3]Goel R, Danda D, Kumar S, Joseph G. Rapid control of disease activity by tocilizumab in 10 «difficult-to-treat» cases of Takayasu arteritis. Int J Rheum Dis 2013;16(6):754–61.[4]Cañas CA, Cañas F, Izquierdo JH, Echeverri A-F, Mejía M, Bonilla-Abadía F, et al. Efficacy and safety of anti-interleukin 6 receptor monoclonal antibody (tocilizumab) in Colombian patients with Takayasu arteritis. J Clin Rheumatol Pract Rep Rheum Musculoskelet Dis 2014;20(3):125–9.[5]Batu ED, Sönmez HE, Hazirolan T, Özaltin F, Bilginer Y, Özen S. Tocilizumab treatment in childhood Takayasu arteritis: case series of four patients and systematic review of the literature. Semin Arthritis Rheum 2017 Feb;46(4):529–35.Disclosure of Interests:None declared

scholarly journals Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor- and chemotherapy-induced large-vessel vasculitis: six patient cases and a systematic literature review

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kirsi Taimen ◽  
Samu Heino ◽  
Ia Kohonen ◽  
Heikki Relas ◽  
Riikka Huovinen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Event ◽  
Literature Review ◽  
Systematic Literature Review ◽  
Case Reports ◽  
Large Vessel Vasculitis ◽  
Large Vessel ◽  
Granulocyte Colony Stimulating Factor ◽  
Colony Stimulating Factor ◽  
Drug Induced ◽  
Stimulating Factor

Abstract Objective Patients receiving chemotherapy are prone to neutropoenic infections, presenting with non-specific symptoms such as a high fever and elevated inflammatory parameters. Large-vessel vasculitis (LVV) may have a similar clinical presentation and should be included in differential diagnostics. A few published case reports and adverse event reports suggest a causal association between LVV and the use of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) and chemotherapy. Our objective was to evaluate the relationship between LVV, G-CSF and chemotherapy. Methods Between 2016 and 2018, we identified six patients in Finland with probable drug-induced LVV associated with G-CSF and chemotherapy. All six patients had breast cancer. A systematic literature review was performed according to PRISMA guidelines using comprehensive search terms for cancer, chemotherapy, G-CSF and LVV. Results The literature search identified 18 similar published case reports, of which most were published after 2014. In all patients combined (n = 24), the time delay from the last drug administration to the LVV symptoms was on average 5 days with G-CSF (range = 1–8 days) and 9 days with chemotherapy (range = 1–21 days). Common symptoms were fever (88%), neck pain (50%) and chest pain (42%). Based on imaging, 17/24 (71%) had vascular inflammation in the thoracic aorta and supra-aortic vessels, but 5/24 (21%) reportedly had inflammation limited to the carotid area. Conclusion This review suggests that LVV may be a possible serious adverse event associated with G-CSF and chemotherapy. Successful management of drug-induced LVV requires early identification, through diagnostic imaging, and discontinuation of the drug.

scholarly journals SAT0052 THERAPEUTIC STRATEGIES IN DIFFICULT-TO-TREAT RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS: PRELIMINARY RESULTS OF A SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEW INFORMING THE 2020 EULAR RECOMMENDATIONS FOR THE MANAGEMENT OF DIFFICULT-TO-TREAT RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS

2020 ◽  
Vol 79 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 957-957
Author(s):  
N. M. T. Roodenrijs ◽  
A. Hamar ◽  
M. Kedves ◽  
G. Nagy ◽  
J. M. Van Laar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rheumatoid Arthritis ◽  
Literature Review ◽  
Systematic Literature Review ◽  
Therapeutic Strategies ◽  
Eular Recommendations ◽  
Management Interventions ◽  
Fatigue Exercise ◽  
Factor Inhibitor ◽  
Management Recommendations ◽  
Sat 1

Background:Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients treated according to European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) recommendations failing ≥2 biological or targeted synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (b/tsDMARDs) with a different mode of action who still have complaints which may be suggestive of active disease may be defined as suffering from ‘difficult-to-treat RA’. Management recommendations for RA focus predominantly on the earlier phases of the disease and specific recommendations for difficult-to-treat RA patients are currently lacking.1Objectives:To systematically summarise evidence in the literature on pharmacological and non-pharmacological therapeutic strategies for difficult-to-treat RA patients, informing the 2020 EULAR recommendations for the management of difficult-to-treat RA.Methods:A systematic literature review (SLR) was performed: PubMed, Embase and Cochrane databases were searched up to December 2019. Relevant papers were selected and appraised.Results:Thirty articles were selected for therapeutic strategies in patients with limited DMARD options due to contraindications, 73 for patients in whom previous b/tsDMARDs were not effective (‘true refractory RA’), and 51 for patients with predominantly non-inflammatory complaints. For patients with limited DMARD options, limited evidence was found on effective DMARD options for patients with concomitant obesity, and on safe DMARD options for patients with concomitant hepatitis B and C. In patients who failed ≥2 bDMARDs, tocilizumab, tofacitinib, baricitinib, upadacitinib and filgotinib were found to be more effective than placebo, but evidence was insufficient to prioritise. In patients who failed ≥1 bDMARD, there was a tendency of non-tumour necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi) bDMARDs to be more effective than TNFi (Figure 1). Generally, b/tsDMARDs become less effective when patients failed more bDMARDs, this tendency was not clear for upadacitinib and filgotinib (Figure 2). In patients with predominantly non-inflammatory complaints (mainly function, pain and fatigue), exercise, education, psychological and self-management interventions were found to be of additional benefit.Conclusion:This SLR underscores the scarcity of evidence on the optimal treatment of difficult-to-treat RA patients. As difficult-to-treat RA is a newly defined disease state, all evidence is to an extent indirect. Several b/tsDMARDs were found to be effective in patients who failed ≥2 bDMARDs and generally effectiveness decreased with a higher number of failed bDMARDs. Additionally, a beneficial effect of non-pharmacological interventions was found on non-inflammatory complaints.References:[1] Smolen JSet al. Ann Rheum Dis2020. Epub ahead of print.Disclosure of Interests:Nadia M. T. Roodenrijs: None declared, Attila Hamar: None declared, Melinda Kedves: None declared, György Nagy: None declared, Jacob M. van Laar Grant/research support from: MSD, Genentech, Consultant of: MSD, Roche, Pfizer, Eli Lilly, BMS, Désirée van der Heijde Consultant of: AbbVie, Amgen, Astellas, AstraZeneca, BMS, Boehringer Ingelheim, Celgene, Cyxone, Daiichi, Eisai, Eli-Lilly, Galapagos, Gilead Sciences, Inc., Glaxo-Smith-Kline, Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Regeneron, Roche, Sanofi, Takeda, UCB Pharma; Director of Imaging Rheumatology BV, Paco Welsing: None declared

EULAR recommendations for the management of large vessel vasculitis

2008 ◽  
Vol 68 (3) ◽  
pp. 318-323 ◽  
Author(s):  
C Mukhtyar ◽  
L Guillevin ◽  
M C Cid ◽  
B Dasgupta ◽  
K de Groot ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Large Vessel Vasculitis ◽  
Large Vessel ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Drug Regulatory Agency ◽  
Modified Delphi ◽  
Eular Recommendations ◽  
European League Against Rheumatism ◽  
The Usa ◽  
Modified Delphi Technique ◽  
Management Recommendations

Objectives:To develop European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) recommendations for the management of large vessel vasculitis.Methods:An expert group (10 rheumatologists, 3 nephrologists, 2 immunolgists, 2 internists representing 8 European countries and the USA, a clinical epidemiologist and a representative from a drug regulatory agency) identified 10 topics for a systematic literature search through a modified Delphi technique. In accordance with standardised EULAR operating procedures, recommendations were derived for the management of large vessel vasculitis. In the absence of evidence, recommendations were formulated on the basis of a consensus opinion.Results:Seven recommendations were made relating to the assessment, investigation and treatment of patients with large vessel vasculitis. The strength of recommendations was restricted by the low level of evidence and EULAR standardised operating procedures.Conclusions:On the basis of evidence and expert consensus, management recommendations for large vessel vasculitis have been formulated and are commended for use in everyday clinical practice.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document