scholarly journals OP0281 EXCESS GIANT CELL ARTERITIS CASES ARE ASSOCIATED WITH PEAKS IN COVID-19 PREVALENCE

2021 ◽  
Vol 80 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 170.2-170
Author(s):  
B. Mulhearn ◽  
J. Ellis ◽  
S. Skeoch ◽  
J. Pauling ◽  
S. Tansley

Background:Immediately following the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic, the number of giant cell arteritis (GCA) diagnoses noticeably increased at the Royal National Hospital for Rheumatic Diseases in Bath, UK. Furthermore, there was an increase in the proportion of patients with visual complications [1]. The finding supports the viral hypothesis of GCA aetiopathogenesis as previously described [2]. This not only has ramifications for understanding the underlying disease mechanisms in GCA but also has implications for the provision of local GCA services which may have already be affected by the pandemic.Objectives:The objective of the study was to estimate the incidence of giant cell arteritis during the COVID-19 pandemic years of 2020 – 2021 and compare it to 2019 data. Given that there have now been two distinct peaks of COVID-19 as reflected by hospital admissions of COVID-19-positive patients this has allowed us to investigate if there is a temporal relationship between the prevalence of COVID-19 and the incidence of GCA.Methods:The incidence of GCA was calculated by assessing emailed referrals to the GCA service and the hospital electronic medical records to identity positive cases from 2019 to the current date. Local COVID-19 prevalence was estimated by measuring the number of hospital beds taken up by COVID-19 positive patients, available publicly in a UK Government COVID-19 dataset [3].Results:There were 61 (95% Poisson distribution confidence interval [CI] 47 - 78) probable or definite GCA diagnoses made in 2020 compared to 28 (CI 19 – 40) in 2019 (Figure 1). This is an excess of 33 cases in 2020, or an increase in 118%. Given that 41% of the hospital’s catchment population is over 50, this equates to an annual incidence rate of 13.7 per 100,000 in 2019 and 29.8 per 100,000 in 2020. This compares to a previously estimated regional incidence rate of 21.6 per 100,000 for the South West of the UK [4].Figure 1. Prevalence of hospital COVID-19 and incidence of GCA (2019 – 2021). Graph showing the number of hospital beds occupied by COVID-19-positive patients in 2020 – 2021 (blue circles), number of daily GCA diagnoses in 2020 – 2021 (red circles), and previous GCA diagnoses in 2019 (green circles). The broken lines represent moving averages with a period of 7 days for COVID-19 cases and 28 days for GCA diagnoses.A peak in COVID-19-positive inpatients was seen on 10th April 2020 with a corresponding peak of GCA diagnoses on 29th May 2020, giving a lag period of approximately 6 weeks between these peaks (Figure 1).Conclusion:The incidence of GCA in Bath was significantly increased in 2020 compared to 2019. This may be the result of the widespread infection of the local population with the COVID-19 virus as a precipitating factor. Possible mechanisms include, but are not limited to, endothelial disruption by the virus, immune system priming towards T helper cell type 1 (Th1) cellular immunity and/or activation of the monocyte-macrophage system. More work is currently underway to assess the causal relationship between the two diseases.There was a lag period of 6 weeks between the peak during the first wave of the pandemic and the rise in GCA cases. We shall be closely monitoring the number of referrals that follow the current wave of the pandemic.References:[1]Luther R, Skeoch S, Pauling JD, et al. Increased number of cases of giant cell arteritis and higher rates of ophthalmic involvement during the era of COVID-19. Rheumatol Adv Pract 2020;4:1–4. doi:10.1093/rap/rkaa067[2]Russo MG, Waxman J, Abdoh AA, et al. Correlation between infection and the onset of the giant cell (temporal) arteritis syndrome. Arthritis Rheum 1995;38:374–80. doi:10.1002/art.1780380312[3]England PH. GOV.UK Coronavirus (COVID-19) in the UK. 2021.https://coronavirus.data.gov.uk/details/download (accessed 25 Jan 2021).[4]Smeeth L, Cook C, Hall AJ. Incidence of diagnosed polymyalgia rheumatica and temporal arteritis in the United Kingdom, 1990-2001. Ann Rheum Dis 2006;65:1093–8. doi:10.1136/ard.2005.046912Disclosure of Interests:Ben Mulhearn Speakers bureau: Novartis UK, 2019, Grant/research support from: Chugai, 2019, Jessica Ellis: None declared, Sarah Skeoch: None declared, John Pauling: None declared, Sarah Tansley: None declared

2018 ◽  
Vol 69 (1) ◽  
pp. 152-154
Author(s):  
Vasilica Cristescu ◽  
Aurelia Romila ◽  
Luana Andreea Macovei

Polymyalgia rheumatica is a disease that occurs mostly in the elderly and is rarely seen in patients less than 50 years of age. Polymyalgia rheumatica is a vasculitis, which manifests itself as an inflammatory disease of the vascular wall that can affect any type of blood vessel, regardless of its size. It has been considered a form of giant cell arteritis, involving primarily large and medium arteries and to a lesser extent the arterioles. Clinical manifestations are caused by the generic pathogenic process and depend on the characteristics of the damaged organ. PMR is a senescence-related immune disorder. It has been defined as a stand-alone condition and a syndrome referred to as rheumatic polyarteritis with manifestations of giant cell arteritis (especially in cases of Horton�s disease and temporal arteritis) which are commonly associated with polymyalgia. The clinical presentation is clearly dominated by the painful girdle syndrome, with a feeling of general discomfort. Polymyalgia and temporal arteritis may coexist or be consecutive to each other in the same patient, as in most of our patients. The present study describes 3 cases of polymyalgia rheumatica, admitted to the Clinic of Rheumatology of Sf. Apostol Andrei Hospital, Galati. The cases were compared with the literature. Two clinical aspects (polymyalgia rheumatica and/or Horton�s disease) and the relationship between them were also considered. Polymyalgia rheumatica is currently thought to have a multifactorial etiology, in which the following factors play a role: genetic factors or hereditary predisposition (some individuals are more prone to this disease), immune factors and viral infections (triggers of the disease). Other risk factors of polymyalgia rheumatica include age over 50 years and the association with giant cell arteritis. The characteristic feature of the disease is girdle pain, with intense stiffness of at least one hour�s duration. Markers of inflammation, erythrocyte sedimentation rate and C-reactive protein are almost always increased at the onset of the disease. Diseases that can mimic the clinical picture of polymyalgia rheumatica are neoplasia, infections, metabolic disorders of the bone and endocrine diseases.


1992 ◽  
Vol 68 (806) ◽  
pp. 985-986 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. L. Rodriguez-Garcia ◽  
C. Montalban ◽  
A. Zapatero ◽  
J. Saban ◽  
L. Capote

Author(s):  
Jan Tore Gran

Polymyalgia rheumatica and temporal arteritis are distinct but overlapping inflammatory conditions of unknown aetiology. They almost exclusively affect people over 50 years of age, women more than men (ratio 2–3:1), and particularly those of Nordic heritage. Temporal arteritis is characterized by granulomatous inflammation that penetrates all layers of the wall of medium and (often) large muscular arteries, in particular the superficial temporal artery. Histological examination of tissues from patients with polymyalgia rheumatica shows nonspecific changes only. The term ‘giant cell arteritis’ is properly used only to describe patients with biopsy-proven arteritis....


Eye ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 23 (7) ◽  
pp. 1608-1609 ◽  
Author(s):  
E Guerin ◽  
P Alexander ◽  
P Lanyon ◽  
K Robinson ◽  
A Foss

2020 ◽  
Vol 59 (11) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hind Al‐Busani ◽  
Takeshi Namiki ◽  
Shown Tokoro ◽  
Tsukasa Ugajin ◽  
Keiko Miura ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document