Antenatal and postnatal mental health: summary of updated NICE guidance

BMJ ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 349 (dec18 5) ◽  
pp. g7394-g7394 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. M. Howard ◽  
O. Megnin-Viggars ◽  
I. Symington ◽  
S. Pilling ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 20 (2) ◽  
pp. 230-235 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chris M. Blanchard ◽  
Isabelle Côté ◽  
David Feeny

Objectives: Summary physical health scores for the Short Form (SF) measures are computing using positive weights for physical items and negative weights for mental health items. Mental health summary scores use positive weights for mental items and negative weights for physical. The RAND Health Status Inventory (HSI) measures do not use negative weights. Do these different approaches to scoring matter? The objective was to compare summary scores using both the SF and RAND-HSI.Methods: SF-36 and the Health Utilities Index Mark 3 (HUI3) were administered to a cohort of patients waiting for elective total hip arthroplasty (THA). SF-12 and HUI3 were administered to a cohort of high-risk primary-care patients. Summary scores were generated and compared. Single-attribute utility scores for emotion in HUI3 were also computed. Canadian and US norms for SF, RAND-HSI, and HUI3 were used to interpret results.Results: For THA patients, mean physical health scores were 28 and 36 for SF and RAND-HSI. Mean mental health scores were 55 and 42. For the primary-care patients, the scores were 34 and 36 for physical and 46 and 40 for mental health.Conclusions: SF and RAND-HSI provided somewhat similar summary scores in the THA study. However, SF and RAND-HSI mental health scores differed in the primary-care patient cohort and results from HUI3 corroborate the mental health deficits identified by the RAND-HSI. It may be wise for investigators to use both SF and RAND-HSI scoring systems.


2015 ◽  
Vol 30 (10) ◽  
pp. 1524-1530 ◽  
Author(s):  
Benjamin D. Schalet ◽  
Nan E. Rothrock ◽  
Ron D. Hays ◽  
Lewis E. Kazis ◽  
Karon F. Cook ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Ashis Banerjee ◽  
Clara Oliver

Psychiatry frequently appears in the Intermediate FRCEM short-answer question (SAQ) paper, reflecting the Royal College of Emergency Medicine (RCEM) curriculum. In-depth knowledge of different mental health problems is not required but this chapter includes the pertinent points to risk assessment and self-harm, as well as the management of a violent patient. In addition, this chapter summarizes the types of mental health disorder and differentiation between functional and organic disorders; for example, the differential diagnosis of an acutely confused adult. NICE guidance on the management of self-harm and suicide risk has recently changed and this chapter reflects recent guidance. This chapter also summarizes the associated complications of psychiatric medications including serotonin syndrome and the potentially fatal neuroleptic malignant syndrome.


2008 ◽  
Vol 81 (4) ◽  
pp. 351-364 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gillian. Leng ◽  
Nick. Baillie ◽  
Thara. Raj
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document